Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Conserved pathways within bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment
Brian P. Kelley*,
Roded Sharan,
Richard M. Karp,
Taylor Sittler*,
David E. Root*,
Brent R. Stockwell*, and
Trey Ideker*,
*Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142; and International Computer Science Institute, 1947 Center Street, No. 600, Berkeley, CA 94704
Contributed by Richard M. Karp, July 25, 2003
Abstract:
We implement a strategy for aligning two protein–proteininteraction networks that combines interaction topology andprotein sequence similarity to identify conserved interactionpathways and complexes. Using this approach we show that theprotein–protein interaction networks of two distantlyrelated species, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Helicobacter pylori,harbor a large complement of evolutionarily conserved pathways,and that a large number of pathways appears to have duplicatedand specialized within yeast. Analysis of these findings revealsmany well characterized interaction pathways as well as manyunanticipated pathways, the significance of which is reinforcedby their presence in the networks of both species.
To whom correspondence should be sent at the present address:University of California at San Diego, Department of Bioengineering,9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093. E-mail: trey{at}bioeng.ucsd.edu.
Abbreviation: MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase.
The term "pathway" has been used broadly within various molecularbiological contexts to refer to biochemical reaction chains,signal transduction cascades, gene regulatory systems, or othersequences of biomolecular events. Here a pathway refers to asequence of protein–protein interactions forming a connectedpath in the network.
¶ We have also explored methods for identifying conserved subnetworksas opposed to linear paths (see Fig. 7, which is published assupporting information on the PNAS web site); choosing whichapproach is most desirable remains an open problem and dependson issues of computational efficiency and whether protein complexesor sequential pathways such as signal transduction or regulatorycascades are of highest interest.
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
IsoRankN: spectral methods for global alignment of multiple protein networks.
C.-S. Liao, K. Lu, M. Baym, R. Singh, and B. Berger (2009)
Bioinformatics
25, i253-i258
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Novel pathway compendium analysis elucidates mechanism of pro-angiogenic synthetic small molecule.
K. A. Wieghaus, E. P. Gianchandani, M. A. Paige, M. L. Brown, E. A. Botchwey, and J. A. Papin (2008)
Bioinformatics
24, 2384-2390
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Global alignment of multiple protein interaction networks with application to functional orthology detection.
Current progress in network research: toward reference networks for key model organisms.
B. S. Srinivasan, N. H. Shah, J. A. Flannick, E. Abeliuk, A. F. Novak, and S. Batzoglou (2007)
Brief Bioinform
8, 318-332
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Identification of functional modules from conserved ancestral protein protein interactions.
Molecular Interaction Maps of Bioregulatory Networks: A General Rubric for Systems Biology.
K. W. Kohn, M. I. Aladjem, J. N. Weinstein, and Y. Pommier (2006)
Mol. Biol. Cell
17, 1-13
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Syntons, metabolons and interactons: an exact graph-theoretical approach for exploring neighbourhood between genomic and functional data.
F. Boyer, A. Morgat, L. Labarre, J. Pothier, and A. Viari (2005)
Bioinformatics
21, 4209-4215
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Alignment of metabolic pathways.
R. Y. Pinter, O. Rokhlenko, E. Yeger-Lotem, and M. Ziv-Ukelson (2005)
Bioinformatics
21, 3401-3408
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Differential network expression during drug and stress response.
L. Cabusora, E. Sutton, A. Fulmer, and C. V. Forst (2005)
Bioinformatics
21, 2898-2905
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Comprehensive Interaction Map of the Arabidopsis MADS Box Transcription Factors.
S. de Folter, R. G.H. Immink, M. Kieffer, L. Parenicova, S. R. Henz, D. Weigel, M. Busscher, M. Kooiker, L. Colombo, M. M. Kater, et al. (2005)
PLANT CELL
17, 1424-1433
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks.
R. Christmas, I. Avila-Campillo, H. Bolouri, B. Schwikowski, M. Anderson, R. Kelley, N. Landys, C. Workman, T. Ideker, E. Cerami, et al. (2005)
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book
2005, 12-16
|Full Text »|PDF »
Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species.
R. Sharan, S. Suthram, R. M. Kelley, T. Kuhn, S. McCuine, P. Uetz, T. Sittler, R. M. Karp, and T. Ideker (2005)
PNAS
102, 1974-1979
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
PathBLAST: a tool for alignment of protein interaction networks.
B. P. Kelley, B. Yuan, F. Lewitter, R. Sharan, B. R. Stockwell, and T. Ideker (2004)
Nucleic Acids Res.
32, W83-W88
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Comparative Analysis of Protein Domain Organization.