Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Molecular chaperones function as steroid receptor nuclear mobility factors
Cem Elbi *,
Dawn A. Walker *,
Guillermo Romero,
William P. Sullivan,
David O. Toft,
Gordon L. Hager *, and
Donald B. DeFranco
*Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, Building 41, Room B602, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055; Department of Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261; and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Graduate School, Rochester, MN 55905
Communicated by Jack Gorski, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, January 8, 2004
Received for publication November 20, 2003.
Abstract:
Live cell imaging has revealed the rapid mobility of steroidhormone receptors within nuclei and their dynamic exchange attranscriptionally active target sites. Although a number ofother proteins have been shown to be highly mobile within nuclei,the identity of soluble factors responsible for orchestratingnuclear trafficking remains unknown. We have developed a previouslyundescribed in situ subnuclear trafficking assay that generatestranscriptionally active nuclei, which are depleted of solublefactors required for the nuclear mobility of glucocorticoid(GR) and progesterone receptors (PR). Using this system anda fluorescence recovery after photobleaching technique, we demonstratethat nuclear mobility of GR recovered on incubation with reticulocytelysate was inhibited by geldanamycin, a drug that blocks thechaperone activity of heat-shock protein 90. Direct proof ofmolecular chaperone involvement in steroid receptor subnucleartrafficking was provided by the ATP-dependent recovery of nuclearmobility of GR and PR on incubation with various combinationsof purified chaperone and/or cochaperone proteins. Additionally,for both receptors, the inclusion of hormone during the recoveryperiod leads to a retardation of nuclear mobility. Thus, ourresults provide a description of soluble nuclear mobility factorsand furthermore demonstrate a previously unrecognized role formolecular chaperones in the regulation of steroid receptor functionwithin the nucleus.
Gedunin Inactivates the Co-chaperone p23 Protein Causing Cancer Cell Death by Apoptosis.
C. A. Patwardhan, A. Fauq, L. B. Peterson, C. Miller, B. S. J. Blagg, and A. Chadli (2013)
J. Biol. Chem.
288, 7313-7325
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Role of the HSP90-Associated Cochaperone p23 in Enhancing Activity of the Androgen Receptor and Significance for Prostate Cancer.
V. Reebye, L. Querol Cano, D. N. Lavery, G. N. Brooke, S. M. Powell, D. Chotai, M. M. Walker, H. C. Whitaker, R. Wait, H. C. Hurst, et al. (2012)
Mol. Endocrinol.
26, 1694-1706
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
The Stress of Protein Misfolding: From Single Cells to Multicellular Organisms.
T. Gidalevitz, V. Prahlad, and R. I. Morimoto (2011)
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol
3, a009704
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Avian Reovirus SigmaA Localizes to the Nucleolus and Enters the Nucleus by a Nonclassical Energy- and Carrier-Independent Pathway.
L. Vazquez-Iglesias, I. Lostale-Seijo, J. Martinez-Costas, and J. Benavente (2009)
J. Virol.
83, 10163-10175
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Nuclear matrix binding is critical for progesterone receptor movement into nuclear foci.
J. D. Graham, A. R. Hanson, A. J. Croft, A. H. Fox, and C. L. Clarke (2009)
FASEB J
23, 546-556
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Minireview: The Intersection of Steroid Receptors with Molecular Chaperones: Observations and Questions.
Chromatin Remodeling Complexes Interact Dynamically with a Glucocorticoid Receptor-regulated Promoter.
T. A. Johnson, C. Elbi, B. S. Parekh, G. L. Hager, and S. John (2008)
Mol. Biol. Cell
19, 3308-3322
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Activation of the DNA-dependent Protein Kinase Stimulates Nuclear Export of the Androgen Receptor in Vitro.
L. C. Shank, J. B. Kelley, D. Gioeli, C.-S. Yang, A. Spencer, L. A. Allison, and B. M. Paschal (2008)
J. Biol. Chem.
283, 10568-10580
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Control of Estradiol-Directed Gene Transactivation by an Intracellular Estrogen-Binding Protein and an Estrogen Response Element-Binding Protein.
The Ligand Binding Domain Controls Glucocorticoid Receptor Dynamics Independent of Ligand Release.
S. H. Meijsing, C. Elbi, H. F. Luecke, G. L. Hager, and K. R. Yamamoto (2007)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
27, 2442-2451
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Ligand-Specific Dynamics of the Androgen Receptor at Its Response Element in Living Cells.
T. I. Klokk, P. Kurys, C. Elbi, A. K. Nagaich, A. Hendarwanto, T. Slagsvold, C.-Y. Chang, G. L. Hager, and F. Saatcioglu (2007)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
27, 1823-1843
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Modelling the glucocorticoid receptor and producing therapeutic agents with anti-inflammatory effects but reduced side-effects.
Association with Coregulators Is the Major Determinant Governing Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor Mobility in Living Cells.
C. Tudor, J. N. Feige, H. Pingali, V. B. Lohray, W. Wahli, B. Desvergne, Y. Engelborghs, and L. Gelman (2007)
J. Biol. Chem.
282, 4417-4426
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
International Union of Pharmacology. LXV. The Pharmacology and Classification of the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily: Glucocorticoid, Mineralocorticoid, Progesterone, and Androgen Receptors.
N. Z. Lu, S. E. Wardell, K. L. Burnstein, D. Defranco, P. J. Fuller, V. Giguere, R. B. Hochberg, L. McKay, J.-M. Renoir, N. L. Weigel, et al. (2006)
Pharmacol. Rev.
58, 782-797
|Full Text »|PDF »
Abnormal Expression and Distribution of Heat Shock Protein 90: Potential Etiologic Immunoendocrine Mechanism of Glucocorticoid Resistance in Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome.
J. Ouyang, T. Jiang, M. Tan, Y. Cui, and X. Li (2006)
Clin. Vaccine Immunol.
13, 496-500
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
GCUNC-45 Is a Novel Regulator for the Progesterone Receptor/hsp90 Chaperoning Pathway.
A. Chadli, J. D. Graham, M. G. Abel, T. A. Jackson, D. F. Gordon, W. M. Wood, S. J. Felts, K. B. Horwitz, and D. Toft (2006)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
26, 1722-1730
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Nuclear Localization and Dynamic Properties of the Marek's Disease Virus Oncogene Products Meq and Meq/vIL8.
J. M. Anobile, V. Arumugaswami, D. Downs, K. Czymmek, M. Parcells, and C. J. Schmidt (2006)
J. Virol.
80, 1160-1166
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Antiandrogens prevent stable DNA-binding of the androgen receptor.
P. Farla, R. Hersmus, J. Trapman, and A. B. Houtsmuller (2005)
J. Cell Sci.
118, 4187-4198
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Fluorescence Imaging Reveals the Nuclear Behavior of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor/Retinoid X Receptor Heterodimers in the Absence and Presence of Ligand.
J. N. Feige, L. Gelman, C. Tudor, Y. Engelborghs, W. Wahli, and B. Desvergne (2005)
J. Biol. Chem.
280, 17880-17890
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Ligand-Specific Dynamics of the Progesterone Receptor in Living Cells and during Chromatin Remodeling In Vitro.
G. V. Rayasam, C. Elbi, D. A. Walker, R. Wolford, T. M. Fletcher, D. P. Edwards, and G. L. Hager (2005)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
25, 2406-2418
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Evidence for Glucocorticoid Receptor Transport on Microtubules by Dynein.
J. M. Harrell, P. J. M. Murphy, Y. Morishima, H. Chen, J. F. Mansfield, M. D. Galigniana, and W. B. Pratt (2004)
J. Biol. Chem.
279, 54647-54654
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Dynamic Control of Nuclear Receptor Transcription.
A Novel In Situ Assay for the Identification and Characterization of Soluble Nuclear Mobility Factors.
C. Elbi, D. A. Walker, M. Lewis, G. Romero, W. P. Sullivan, D. O. Toft, G. L. Hager, and D. B. DeFranco (2004)
Sci. STKE
2004, pl10
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »