Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Dual signaling is differentially activated by different active states of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1
Michihiro Tateyama *,,, and
Yoshihiro Kubo *,,
*Division of Biophysics and Neurobiology, Department of Molecular Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan; Solution Oriented Research for Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan; andCOE Program for Brain Integration and Its Disorders, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan
Edited by Lily Y. Jan, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, and approved November 23, 2005
Received for publication July 13, 2005.
Abstract:
The metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) is crucial forsome forms of synaptic plasticity, by inducing various cellresponses via coupling to various types of G proteins. Uponglutamate binding, an active conformation, closedopen/active,of the extracellular domain is stabilized, which induces dimericrearrangement in the intracellular domains, resulting in theinitiation of downstream signals. We have confirmed that mGluR1functionally interacts with both Gq and Gs pathways; a combinationof fluorescent indicators showed that glutamate increased intracellularCa2+ and cAMP concentration ([Ca2+]i and [cAMP]i). By contrast,Gd3+, a different type of ligand whose recognition site on mGluR1is distinct from the glutamate site, increased only [Ca2+]iand the concentration-activation curve was bell-shaped. FRETanalysis revealed that a low concentration of Gd3+ induced dimericrearrangement of the intracellular domains of mGluR1 as doesglutamate, whereas a high concentration of Gd3+ reversed theFRET efficiency, which was consistent with a bell-shaped relationshipbetween concentration and Gq activation. These results suggestthat Gd3+ induces an active and a sort of "inactivated" conformationin mGluR1. The Gd3+-induced active state is considered to correspondto the closed-closed/active conformation, revealed by previousx-ray crystallographic studies. In conclusion, the glutamate-inducedclosedopen/active state coupled both to Gs and Gq proteinswhereas the Gd3+-induced closed-closed/active conformation statepreferred Gq to Gs, suggesting that mGluR1 serves not only asa simple on/off switch but also as a multiple signaling pathregulator.
Key Words: FRET G protein-coupling receptor
Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
Positive and Negative Allosteric Modulators Promote Biased Signaling at the Calcium-Sensing Receptor.
A. E. Davey, K. Leach, C. Valant, A. D. Conigrave, P. M. Sexton, and A. Christopoulos (2012)
Endocrinology
153, 1232-1241
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
A Novel Biased Allosteric Compound Inhibitor of Parturition Selectively Impedes the Prostaglandin F2{alpha}-mediated Rho/ROCK Signaling Pathway.
E. Goupil, D. Tassy, C. Bourguet, C. Quiniou, V. Wisehart, D. Petrin, C. Le Gouill, D. Devost, H. H. Zingg, M. Bouvier, et al. (2010)
J. Biol. Chem.
285, 25624-25636
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Seven Transmembrane Receptors as Shapeshifting Proteins: The Impact of Allosteric Modulation and Functional Selectivity on New Drug Discovery.
H. Rebholz, A. Nishi, S. Liebscher, A. C. Nairn, M. Flajolet, and P. Greengard (2009)
PNAS
106, 14096-14101
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Structural rearrangements of the motor protein prestin revealed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer.
K. R. Gleitsman, M. Tateyama, and Y. Kubo (2009)
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
297, C290-C298
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Optical measurement of mGluR1 conformational changes reveals fast activation, slow deactivation, and sensitization.
P. Marcaggi, H. Mutoh, D. Dimitrov, M. Beato, and T. Knopfel (2009)
PNAS
106, 11388-11393
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Neuroprotection by Cell Permeable TAT-mGluR1 Peptide in Ischemia: Synergy between Carrier and Cargo Sequences.
Wei Xu, Miou Zhou, and M. Baudry (2008)
Neuroscientist
14, 409-414
|Abstract »|PDF »
Modeling the Binding and Function of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors.
X. Rovira, D. Roche, J. Serra, J. Kniazeff, J.-P. Pin, and J. Giraldo (2008)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
325, 443-456
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after exposure to gadolinium in patients with renal failure.
J. B. Othersen, J. C. Maize Jr., R. F. Woolson, and M. N. Budisavljevic (2007)
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.
22, 3179-3185
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
G protein-independent neuromodulatory action of adenosine on metabotropic glutamate signalling in mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells.
T. Tabata, D. Kawakami, K. Hashimoto, H. Kassai, T. Yoshida, Y. Hashimotodani, B. B. Fredholm, Y. Sekino, A. Aiba, and M. Kano (2007)
J. Physiol.
581, 693-708
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Dynamic Regulation of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator by Competitive Interactions of Molecular Adaptors.
J. H. Lee, W. Richter, W. Namkung, K. H. Kim, E. Kim, M. Conti, and M. G. Lee (2007)
J. Biol. Chem.
282, 10414-10422
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Coupling of Agonist Binding to Effector Domain Activation in Metabotropic Glutamate-like Receptors.
P. Rondard, J. Liu, S. Huang, F. Malhaire, C. Vol, A. Pinault, G. Labesse, and J.-P. Pin (2006)
J. Biol. Chem.
281, 24653-24661
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Receptors as Microprocessors: Pharmacological Nuance on Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors 1{alpha}.