Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Dong-Gen Luo,1,3,*
Wendy W. S. Yue,1,3,4
Petri Ala-Laurila,5,6
King-Wai Yau1,2,3,*
Abstract:
Vision begins with photoisomerization of visual pigments. Thermal energy can complement photon energy to drive photoisomerization, but it also triggers spontaneous pigment activation as noise that interferes with light detection. For half a century, the mechanism underlying this dark noise has remained controversial. We report here a quantitative relation between a pigments photoactivation energy and its peak-absorption wavelength, max. Using this relation and assuming that pigment activations by light and heat go through the same ground-state isomerization energy barrier, we can predict the relative noise of diverse pigments with multi–vibrational-mode thermal statistics. The agreement between predictions and our measurements strongly suggests that pigment noise arises from canonical isomerization. The predicted high noise for pigments with max in the infrared presumably explains why they apparently do not exist in nature.
1 Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. 3 Center for Sensory Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. 4 Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Biology Graduate Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. 5 Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. 6 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dgluo{at}jhmi.edu (D.-G.L.); kwyau{at}mail.jhmi.edu (K.-W.Y.)
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Signaling
EDITORS' CHOICE
Valda K. Vinson (14 June 2011) Sci. Signal.4 (177), ec167.
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.4177ec167] |Abstract »
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Observations on land-snail shells in near-ultraviolet, visible and near-infrared radiation.
Common mechanisms regulating dark noise and quantum bump amplification in Drosophila photoreceptors.
B. Chu, C.-H. Liu, S. Sengupta, A. Gupta, P. Raghu, and R. C. Hardie (2013)
J Neurophysiol
109, 2044-2055
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
A Photochromic Histidine Kinase Rhodopsin (HKR1) That Is Bimodally Switched by Ultraviolet and Blue Light.
M. Luck, T. Mathes, S. Bruun, R. Fudim, R. Hagedorn, T. M. Tran Nguyen, S. Kateriya, J. T. M. Kennis, P. Hildebrandt, and P. Hegemann (2012)
J. Biol. Chem.
287, 40083-40090
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
The Molecular Mechanism of Thermal Noise in Rod Photoreceptors.
S. Gozem, I. Schapiro, N. Ferre, and M. Olivucci (2012)
Science
337, 1225-1228
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Camouflage and Display for Soft Machines.
S. A. Morin, R. F. Shepherd, S. W. Kwok, A. A. Stokes, A. Nemiroski, and G. M. Whitesides (2012)
Science
337, 828-832
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Spectral tuning by selective chromophore uptake in rods and cones of eight populations of nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius).
P. Saarinen, J. Pahlberg, G. Herczeg, M. Viljanen, M. Karjalainen, T. Shikano, J. Merila, and K. Donner (2012)
J. Exp. Biol.
215, 2760-2773
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Rod and Cone Visual Pigments and Phototransduction through Pharmacological, Genetic, and Physiological Approaches.