Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Subscribe

Sci. Signal., 25 August 2009
Vol. 2, Issue 85, p. eg11
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.285eg11]

EDITORIAL GUIDES

Re-reviewing Peer Review

Michael B. Yaffe1,2*

1 Chief Scientific Editor of Science Signaling, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20005, USA.
2 David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Departments of Biology and Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

Abstract: The peer-review process can be improved by having reviewers focus on improving the work rather than simply noting its flaws.

* Corresponding author. E-mail: myaffe{at}aaas.org

Citation: M. B. Yaffe, Re-reviewing Peer Review. Sci. Signal. 2, eg11 (2009).

Read the Full Text



To Advertise     Find Products


Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882