Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Subscribe

Sci. STKE, 22 August 2006
Vol. 2006, Issue 349, p. pe32
[DOI: 10.1126/stke.3492006pe32]

A RSK(y) Relationship with Promiscuous PKA

Miles D. Houslay*

Molecular Pharmacology Group, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Wolfson Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK.

Abstract: Where, when, and with "whom" do molecules interact? Such relations in space and time are key concepts that currently engage investigators of cellular signaling processes. The notion of compartmentalized signaling grew out of studies of adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP) signaling processes, and this area continues to generate exciting new paradigms. Distinct clouds of cAMP are formed and shaped within cells by tethered cAMP phosphodiesterases (PDEs). AKAPosomes, formed from distinct subpopulations of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) tethered to anchoring proteins (AKAPs) together with specific substrate molecules, interpret these gradients to generate individualized responses. PKA activity is also regulated by the interaction of other proteins with the regulatory (R) or catalytic (C) subunits of PKA, and a mechanism has been uncovered in which ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK1) interacts with either PKA subunit, depending on whether RSK1 has been phosphorylated and activated by extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK). Thus, inactive RSK1 binds the RI subunit of PKA to sensitize it to activation, whereas activated RSK1 binds the C subunit to desensitize PKA to cAMP activation. Cross-talk between the key cAMP and ERK signaling pathways provides a mechanism that, along with distinct mechanisms of both positive and negative attenuation provided by Raf and PDE4 isoforms, can be tailored on a cell type–specific basis.

*Contact information. Telephone, 44-141-330-4624; fax, 44-141-330-4365; e-mail, M.Houslay{at}bio.gla.ac.uk

Citation: M. D. Houslay, A RSK(y) Relationship with Promiscuous PKA. Sci. STKE 2006, pe32 (2006).

Read the Full Text


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Pharmacological PKA Inhibition: All May Not Be What It Seems.
A. J. Murray (2008)
Science Signaling 1, re4
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Inhibition of Pin1 Reduces Glutamate-induced Perikaryal Accumulation of Phosphorylated Neurofilament-H in Neurons.
S. Kesavapany, V. Patel, Y.-L. Zheng, T. K. Pareek, M. Bjelogrlic, W. Albers, N. Amin, H. Jaffe, J. S. Gutkind, M. J. Strong, et al. (2007)
Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3645-3655
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
cAMP-Specific Phosphodiesterase-4 Enzymes in the Cardiovascular System: A Molecular Toolbox for Generating Compartmentalized cAMP Signaling.
M. D. Houslay, G. S. Baillie, and D. H. Maurice (2007)
Circ. Res. 100, 950-966
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »

To Advertise     Find Products


Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882