Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Sci. STKE, 18 September 2007
Vol. 2007, Issue 404, p. pe51
[DOI: 10.1126/stke.4042007pe51]
PERSPECTIVES
Dialogue Between LKB1 and AMPK: A Hot Topic at the Cellular Pole
Christelle Forcet and
Marc Billaud*
CNRS Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 5201, Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, Signalisation et Cancer, F-69008 Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, F-69003 Lyon, France; université Lyon 1, Domaine Rockefeller, F-69003 Lyon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon Cedex 08, Lyon, France.
Abstract:
Disruption of cell architecture and change of energy metabolism are two traits of malignant cells. Yet, there was scant evidence that these two cancer hallmarks involved perturbations of a common signaling pathway. Enter LKB1, a kinase that is a tumor suppressor and that is an upstream activator of the adenosine monophosphate (AMP)–activated protein kinase (AMPK), a key sensor of cellular energy status. Four studies now reveal that LKB1 signals through AMPK to facilitate the formation of tight junctions and to maintain epithelial polarity. Thus, LKB1 appears to be a novel class of tumor suppressor that acts as an energy-sensing and polarity checkpoint.
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Signaling
EDITORS' CHOICE
Stella M. Hurtley (12 April 2011) Sci. Signal.4 (168), ec105.
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.4168ec105] |Abstract »
RESEARCH ARTICLES
Leni S. Jacob, Xiaofeng Wu, Michael E. Dodge, Chih-Wei Fan, Ozlem Kulak, Baozhi Chen, Wei Tang, Baolin Wang, James F. Amatruda, and Lawrence Lum (25 January 2011) Sci. Signal.4 (157), ra4.
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2001225] |Editor's Summary »|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »|Supplementary Materials »
PODCASTS
Dario R. Alessi and Annalisa M. VanHook (30 March 2010) Sci. Signal.3 (115), pc7.
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.3115pc7] |Abstract »|Full Text »|Podcast »
EDITORS' CHOICE
Nancy R. Gough (16 June 2009) Sci. Signal.2 (75), ec199.
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.275ec199] |Abstract »
EDITORS' CHOICE
Nancy R. Gough (18 September 2007) Sci. STKE2007 (404), tw339.
[DOI: 10.1126/stke.4042007tw339] |Abstract »
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Regulation of bile canalicular network formation and maintenance by AMP-activated protein kinase and LKB1.
D. Fu, Y. Wakabayashi, Y. Ido, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, and I. M. Arias (2010)
J. Cell Sci.
123, 3294-3302
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
The apical (hPepT1) and basolateral peptide transport systems of Caco-2 cells are regulated by AMP-activated protein kinase.
M. Pieri, H. C. Christian, R. J. Wilkins, C. A. R. Boyd, and D. Meredith (2010)
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
299, G136-G143
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
ATM signals to TSC2 in the cytoplasm to regulate mTORC1 in response to ROS.
A. Alexander, S.-L. Cai, J. Kim, A. Nanez, M. Sahin, K. H. MacLean, K. Inoki, K.-L. Guan, J. Shen, M. D. Person, et al. (2010)
PNAS
107, 4153-4158
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Expression and activity of the 5'-adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase pathway in selected tissues during chicken embryonic development.