Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Sci. Signal., 7 December 2010
Vol. 3, Issue 151, p. ec376
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.3151ec376]


Network Analyses DNA Damage Pathways Revealed

Laura M. Zahn

Science, AAAS, Washington, DC 20005, USA

Despite the dynamic nature of cellular responses, the genetic networks that govern these responses have been mapped primarily as static snapshots. Bandyopadhyay et al. (see the Perspective by Friedman and Schuldiner) report a comparison of large genetic interactomes measured among all yeast kinases, phosphatases, and transcription factors, as the cell responded to DNA damage. The interactomes revealed were highly dynamic structures that changed dramatically with changing conditions. These dynamic interactions reveal genetic relationships that can be more effective than classical "static" interactions (for example, synthetic lethals and epistasis maps) in identifying pathways of interest.

S. Bandyopadhyay, M. Mehta, D. Kuo, M.-K. Sung, R. Chuang, E. J. Jaehnig, B. Bodenmiller, K. Licon, W. Copeland, M. Shales, D. Fiedler, J. Dutkowski, A. Guénolé, H. van Attikum, K. M. Shokat, R. D. Kolodner, W.-K. Huh, R. Aebersold, M.-C. Keogh, N. J. Krogan, T. Ideker, Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage. Science 330, 1385–1389 (2010). [Abstract] [Full Text]

N. Friedman, M. Schuldiner, The DNA damage road map. Science 330, 1327–1328 (2010). [Summary] [Full Text]

Citation: L. M. Zahn, DNA Damage Pathways Revealed. Sci. Signal. 3, ec376 (2010).

To Advertise     Find Products

Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882