Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
|
|
Sci. Signal., 3 January 2012 LETTERSResponse to Comment on "Load-Induced Modulation of Signal Transduction Networks: Reconciling Ultrasensitivity with Bifunctionality?"Peng Jiang1, Alejandra C. Ventura2, Eduardo D. Sontag3, Sofia D. Merajver4, Alexander J. Ninfa1*, and Domitilla Del Vecchio5*
1 Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109–0606, USA. Abstract: Straube suggests that a model that reflects the bifunctional nature of the cycle enzyme uridylyltransferase/uridylyl-removing enzyme (UTase/UR) should be used, in which the UT and UR activities are distinct and reciprocally regulated activity states of the enzyme, and notes that if such a model is used, the effects of retroactivity at intermediate stimulation will be different. However, such a model does not accurately match the observed enzyme regulatory properties and fails to predict the ultrasensitive response obtained in the experiments. Here, we argue that modeling the UTase/UR enzyme as a bifunctional enzyme with reciprocally regulated activity states misses important aspects of the system. * Corresponding authors. E-mail, aninfa{at}umich.edu (A.J.N.); ddv{at}mit.edu (D.D.V.)
Citation: P. Jiang, A. C. Ventura, E. D. Sontag, S. D. Merajver, A. J. Ninfa, D. Del Vecchio, Response to Comment on "Load-Induced Modulation of Signal Transduction Networks: Reconciling Ultrasensitivity with Bifunctionality?". Sci. Signal. 5, lc2 (2012). The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:In Science Signaling
|
Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882