Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Subscribe

Sci. Signal., 8 May 2012
Vol. 5, Issue 223, p. ec128
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2003195]

EDITORS' CHOICE

Migration Three Dimensions, Two Modes of Migration

Ernesto Andrianantoandro

Science Signaling, AAAS, Washington, DC 20005, USA

Cells move in complex three-dimensional (3D) environments in vivo, but most studies focus on migration on uniform 2D surfaces. During 2D migration, the second messenger phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3) and the Rho family guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) Rac1, Cdc42, and RhoA drive formation of lamellipodia at the leading edge of the cell. However, it is unclear how this translates to the more physiologically relevant 3D environment where cells interact with the extracellular matrix (ECM). Petrie et al. explored how intracellular signaling and differing 3D environments supported distinct modes of cell migration. The authors investigated 3D migration of human foreskin fibroblasts in dermal explants and two in vitro models of the ECM: type I collagen and cell-derived matrix (CDM). In explants, cells formed cylindrical structures called lobopodia and, in contrast to events during 2D migration, active Rac1 was not targeted to the leading edge. This represents a mode of migration in between blebbing and lamellipodial motility (see commentary by Sixt). In the soft, nonlinear elastic environment of 3D collagen, cells formed lamellipodia similarly to the way they are formed during 2D migration. But in stiff, linear elastic 3D CDM, cells formed lobopodia. In 3D collagen, as in 2D migration, PIP3 and active Rac1 and Cdc42 were localized to the leading edge of cells, but in 3D CDM their distribution was not polarized. Knockdown or inhibition of RhoA, its effector ROCK, or its downstream target myosin II switched cells from lobopodial to lamellipodial motility in 3D CDM. The results suggest the existence of two different modes of migration that are controlled by external (elastic properties of the ECM) and internal (RhoA, ROCK, and myosin II signaling) contexts.

R. J. Petrie, N. Gavara, R. S. Chadwick, K. M. Yamada, Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 197, 439–455 (2012). [Abstract] [Full Text]

M. Sixt, Cell migration: Fibroblasts find a new way to get ahead. J. Cell Biol. 197, 347–349 (2012). [Abstract] [Full Text]

Citation: E. Andrianantoandro, Three Dimensions, Two Modes of Migration. Sci. Signal. 5, ec128 (2012).



To Advertise     Find Products


Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882