Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Subscribe

Logo for

PNAS 107 (52): 22617-22622

Copyright © 2010 by the National Academy of Sciences.

IL-4/STAT6 immune axis regulates peripheral nutrient metabolism and insulin sensitivity

Roberto R. Ricardo-Gonzaleza,b,1, Alex Red Eaglea,c,1, Justin I. Odegaarda,b, Hani Jouihana, Christine R. Morela, Jose E. Herediaa, Lata Mukundana, Davina Wud, Richard M. Locksleyd, and Ajay Chawlaa,b,e,2

aDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, bGraduate Program in Immunology, and cDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; and dThe Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Medicine and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and eCardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158


Figure 01
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1.. IL-4 and STAT6 regulate liver nutrient metabolism. (A) IL-4 enhances phosphorylation of STAT6 in the liver, but not skeletal muscle or WAT. NS, nonspecific. (B) STAT6 is expressed in primary hepatocytes and becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to IL-4. (C and D) IL-4 regulates macronutrient metabolism in isolated primary hepatocytes. Changes in rates of fatty acid (C) and glucose oxidation (D) in hepatocytes treated with IL-4 (10 ng/mL). (E and F) STAT6 regulates fuel oxidation in primary hepatocytes. Rates of fatty acid (E) and glucose oxidation (F) in wild-type and STAT6-null hepatocytes. (G and H) Induction of PPAR{alpha} and its transcriptional program in livers of STAT6–/– mice. (G) Immunoblotting for PPAR{alpha} and STAT6 in wild-type and STAT6-null livers. β-actin is used as a loading control. (H) Quantitative RT-PCR analyses for PPAR{alpha} and its target genes, acyl-CoA thioesterase 1 (Acot1), fatty-acid binding protein 1 (Fabp1), and fibroblast growth factor 21 (Fgf21), in livers of wild-type and STAT6–/– mice. All results are displayed as means ± SEM n > 3. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

 

Figure 02
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2.. IL-4 and STAT6 inhibit PPAR{alpha} transcriptional activity. (A) Suppression of PPAR{alpha} transcriptional activity by STAT6 and IL-4. CV-1 cells were transfected with reporter plasmid (PPRE3-tk-Luc, 100 ng) and expression plasmids for PPAR{alpha} (25 ng) and STAT6 (varying amounts). (B) Coimmunoprecipitation of STAT6 and PPAR{alpha}. Liver lysates from treated animals were immunoprecipitated with anti-PPAR{alpha} antibody and immunoblotted for STAT6. (C) ChIP analysis of PPAR{alpha} target genes. Chromatin fragments were precipitated from hepatocytes treated with vehicle or Wy14643 (Wy) in the presence or absence of IL-4. Regions flanking the PPAR{alpha} binding sites on Cyp4a10 and Acot1 promoters were amplified by qPCR and data were normalized to IgG control. (D and E) Activation of STAT6 by IL-4 represses PPAR{alpha} transcriptional activity. Quantitative RT-PCR analyses of PPAR{alpha} target genes in primary hepatocytes. Error bars are displayed as mean ± SEM (n = 3–4 for each mouse group). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

 

Figure 03
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3.. Resistance to dietary obesity and increased energy expenditure in STAT6-null mice. (A) Wild-type and STAT6–/– mice were placed on a HFD at 8 wk of age, and weight gain was monitored for 16 wk (n = 5 per genotype). (B) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to determine body composition (n = 5 per genotype). (C) Indirect calorimetry was used to determine VO2 consumption in wild-type and STAT6–/– mice. (D) Immunoblotting for PPAR{alpha} and STAT6 proteins in livers of wild-type and STAT6-null mice after 16 wk of HFD. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR analyses of total liver RNA from wild-type and STAT6–/– mice. Note induction of signature genes for β- and {omega}-oxidation in livers of STAT6–/– mice. (F) Serum Fgf21 levels were quantified by ELISA. (G and H) Quantitative RT-PCR analyses for adipose tissue and pancreatic lipases in WAT and liver of wild-type and STAT6–/– mice. Patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 2 (Pnpla2) and hormone sensitive lipase (Lipe) are expressed in WAT (G), whereas carboxyl ester lipase (Cel) and pancreatic colipase (Clps) are induced in liver (H). (I and J) Induction of uncoupled respiration in STAT6–/– WAT. Quantitative RT-PCR analyses for expression of Ucp1 (I) and Pgc1b (J) mRNAs in epididymal WAT of WT and STAT6–/– mice (n = 5 per genotype). Data presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

 

Figure 04
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4.. Insulin action is decreased in STAT6-null mice. (A and B) Impaired glucose homeostasis in STAT6-null mice fed a HFD. Wild-type (dashed line) and STAT6-null (solid line) mice (8–10 wk old) were fed HFD for 8 to 10 wk (n = 5 per genotype). Increased glucose intolerance (A) and insulin resistance (B), as assessed by intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (2 g/kg) and insulin-tolerance test (0.75 U/kg). (C) Serum insulin levels were quantified by ELISA. (D) Decreased insulin signaling in STAT6–/– mice, as assessed by quantification of phospho-AKT. (E) Increased hepatic triglycerides in STAT6–/– mice (n = 5). (F) Induction of lipogenic gene expression in livers of STAT6–/– mice. All transcripts were measured by qRT-PCR (n = 5). Data presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

 

Figure 05
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5.. IL-4 and Th2 polarization improve glucose homeostasis in mice maintained on a HFD. (A and B) IL-4 treatment protects from diet-induced obesity. Total weight gain (A) and DEXA assessment of adiposity (B). Eight-week-old C57BL/6J mice (n = 6–8 per group) were placed on a HFD for 8 wk, and concurrently treated with saline (dashed line) or IL-4 (solid line). (C and D) Indirect calorimetry measurement of VO2 consumption (C) and locomotor activity (D) (n = 6 per treatment group). (E) Quantification of inflammatory genes in WAT of saline- or IL-4–treated mice by qRT-PCR (n = 6–8 per group). (F–H) IL-4 treatment improves glucose homeostasis. Glucose tolerance (F), insulin tolerance (G), and insulin signaling (H) was assessed in saline and IL-4–treated C57BL/6J mice (n = 6–8 per treatment group). (I) IL-4 treatment suppresses expression of PPAR{alpha} and its target genes in liver. (J and K) OVA-induced Th2 polarization improves glucose tolerance (J) and insulin sensitivity (K) in D011.10 mice. Eight- to 10-wk-old D011.10 mice maintained on HFD were treated with saline (dashed line) or OVA with aluminum hydroxide (solid line) for 8 wk (n = 5 per group). (L) Model of IL-4/STAT6 functions in immunity, nutrient metabolism and longevity. Data presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

 


To Advertise     Find Products


Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882