Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Subscribe

Logo for

Science 304 (5676): 1497-1500

Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science

EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy

J. Guillermo Paez,1,2* Pasi A. Jänne,1,2* Jeffrey C. Lee,1,3* Sean Tracy,1 Heidi Greulich,1,2 Stacey Gabriel,4 Paula Herman,1 Frederic J. Kaye,5 Neal Lindeman,6 Titus J. Boggon,1,3 Katsuhiko Naoki,1 Hidefumi Sasaki,7 Yoshitaka Fujii,7 Michael J. Eck,1,3 William R. Sellers,1,2,4{dagger} Bruce E. Johnson,1,2{dagger} Matthew Meyerson1,3,4{dagger}

Abstract: Receptor tyrosine kinase genes were sequenced in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and matched normal tissue. Somatic mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene EGFR were found in 15of 58 unselected tumors from Japan and 1 of 61 from the United States. Treatment with the EGFR kinase inhibitor gefitinib (Iressa) causes tumor regression in some patients with NSCLC, more frequently in Japan. EGFR mutations were found in additional lung cancer samples from U.S. patients who responded to gefitinib therapy and in a lung adenocarcinoma cell line that was hypersensitive to growth inhibition by gefitinib, but not in gefitinib-insensitive tumors or cell lines. These results suggest that EGFR mutations may predict sensitivity to gefitinib.

1 Departments of Medical Oncology and Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
2 Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
3 Departments of Pathology and Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
4 The Broad Institute at MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
5 Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA.
6 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA 02115, USA.
7 Department of Surgery 2, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan.

Back to Top

Note added in proof: Similar results are being reported by T. J. Lynch et al. (28).

* These authors contributed equally to this work. Back

{dagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: William_Sellers{at}dfci.harvard.edu; Bruce_Johnson{at}dfci.harvard.edu; Matthew_Meyerson{at}dfci.harvard.edu

Protein kinase activation by somatic mutation or chromosomal alteration is a common mechanism of tumorigenesis (1). Inhibition of activated protein kinases through the use of targeted small molecule drugs or antibody-based strategies has emerged as an effective approach to cancer therapy (24). Recently, systematic analysis of kinase genes has identified mutations of the protein serine-threonine kinase gene BRAF in melanoma and other human cancers (5) and of multiple tyrosine kinase genes and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p110{alpha} catalytic subunit gene PIK3CA in human colorectal carcinoma (6, 7).

Lung carcinoma is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States and worldwide for both men and women (8). Chemotherapy for non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), which accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancer cases, remains marginally effective (9).

Recently, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib (Iressa), was approved in Japan and the United States for the treatment of NSCLC. The original rationale for its use was the observation that EGFR is more abundantly expressed in lung carcinoma tissue than in adjacent normal lung (10). However, EGFR expression as detected by immunohistochemistry is not an effective predictor of response to gefitinib (11).

Clinical trials have revealed significant variability in the response to gefitinib, with higher responses seen in Japanese patients than in a predominantly European-derived population (27.5% versus 10.4%, in a multi-institutional phase II trial) (12). In the United States, partial clinical responses to gefitinib have been observed most frequently in women, in nonsmokers, and in patients with adenocarcinomas (1315).

To determine whether mutation of receptor tyrosine kinases plays a causal role in NSCLC, we searched for somatic genetic alterations in a set of 119 primary NSCLC tumors, consisting of 58 samples from Nagoya City University Hospital in Japan and 61 from the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. The tumors included 70 lung adenocarcinomas and 49 other NSCLC tumors from 74 male and 45 female patients, none of whom had documented treatment with gefitinib.

As an initial screen, we amplified and sequenced the exons encoding the activation loops of 47 of the 58 human receptor tyrosine kinase genes (16) (table S1) from genomic DNA from a subset of 58 NSCLC samples that included 41 lung adenocarcinomas. Three of the tumors, all lung adenocarcinomas, showed heterozygous missense mutations in EGFR not present in the DNA from normal lung tissue from the same patients (table S2; S0361, S0388, S0389). No mutations were detected in amplicons from other receptor tyrosine kinase genes. All three tumors had the same EGFR mutation, predicted to change leucine-858 to arginine (Fig. 1A; CTG-> CGG; L858R).


 Fig. 1.. Sequence alignment of selected regions within the EGFR and B-Raf kinase domains. Depiction of each type of EGFR mutation in human NSCLC. EGFR (gb:X00588) mutations in NSCLC tumors are highlighted in yellow. B-Raf (gb:M95712) mutations in multiple tumor types (5) are highlighted in blue. Asterisks denote residues conserved between EGFR and B-Raf. (A) L858R mutations in activation loop. (B) G719S mutant in P-loop. (C) Deletion mutants in EGFR exon 19. [View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]
 

We next examined exons 2 through 25 of EGFR in the complete collection of 119 NSCLC tumors. Exon sequencing of genomic DNA revealed missense and deletion mutations of EGFR in a total of 16 tumors, all within exons 18 through 21 of the kinase domain. All sequence alterations in this group were heterozygous in the tumor DNA; in each case, paired normal lung tissue from the same patient showed wild-type sequence, confirming that the mutations are somatic in origin. The distribution of nucleotide and protein sequence alterations, and the patient characteristics associated with these abnormalities, are summarized in table S2.

Substitution mutations G719S and L858R were detected in two and three tumors, respectively. These mutations are located in the GXGXXG motif of the nucleotide triphosphate binding domain or P-loop and adjacent to the highly conserved DFG motif in the activation loop (17), respectively. The mutated residues are nearly invariant in all protein kinases, and the analogous residues (G463 and L596) in the B-Raf protein serine-threonine kinase are somatically mutated in colorectal, ovarian, and lung carcinomas (5, 18) (Fig. 1, A and B).

We also detected multiple deletion mutations clustered in the region spanning codons 746 to 759 within the kinase domain of EGFR. Ten tumors carried one of two overlapping 15-nucleotide deletions eliminating EGFR codons 746 to 750, starting at nucleotide 2235 or 2236 (Del-1) (Fig. 1C and table S2). EGFR DNA from another tumor displayed a heterozygous 24-nucleotide gap leading to the deletion of codons 752 to 759 (Del-2) (Fig. 1C). Representative chromatograms are shown in fig. S1.

The positions of the substitution mutations and the Del-1 deletion in the three-dimensional structure of the active form of the EGFR kinase domain (19) are shown in Fig. 2. Note that the sequence alterations cluster around the active site of the kinase and that the substitution mutations lie in the activation loop and glycine-rich P-loop, structural elements known to be important for autoregulation in many protein kinases (17).


 Fig. 2.. Positions of missense mutations G719S and L858R and the Del-1 deletion in the three-dimensional structure of the EGFR kinase domain. The activation loop is shown in yellow, the P-loop is in blue, and the C-lobe and N-lobe are as indicated. The residues targeted by mutation or deletion are highlighted in red. The Del-1 mutation targets the residues ELREA in codons 746 to 750. [View Larger Version of this Image (51K GIF file)]
 

The EGFR mutations show a striking correlation with patient characteristics. Mutations were more frequent in adenocarcinomas (15/70 or 21%) than in other NSCLCs (1/49 or 2%), more frequent in women (9/45 or 20%) than in men (7/74 or 9%), and more frequent in the patients from Japan (15/58 or 26%, and 14/41 adenocarcinomas or 32%) than in those from the United States (1/61 or 2%, and 1/29 adenocarcinomas or 3%). The highest fraction of EGFR mutations was observed in Japanese women with adenocarcinoma (8/14 or 57%). Notably, the patient characteristics that correlate with the presence of EGFR mutations are those that correlate with clinical response to gefitinib treatment.

To investigate whether EGFR mutations might be a determinant of gefitinib sensitivity, pretreatment NSCLC samples were obtained from 5 patients who responded and 4 patients who progressed during treatment with gefitinib out of more than 125 patients treated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute either on an expanded access program or after regulatory approval of gefitinib (13). Four of the patients had partial radiographic responses (≥50% tumor regression in a computed tomography scan after 2 months of treatment), whereas the fifth patient experienced dramatic symptomatic improvement in less than 2 months. All of the patients were from the United States and were Caucasian.

While sequencing of the kinase domain (exons 18 through 24) revealed no mutations in tumors from the four patients who progressed on gefitinib, all five tumors from gefitinib-responsive patients harbored EGFR kinase domain mutations. The chi-square test revealed the difference in EGFR mutation frequency between gefitinib responders (5/5) and nonresponders (0/4) to be statistically significant with P = 0.0027, whereas the difference between the gefitinib responders and unselected U.S. NSCLC patients (5/5 versus 1/61) was also significant with P < 10–12 (20). The EGFR L858R mutation, previously observed in the unselected tumors, was identified in one gefitinib-sensitive lung adenocarcinoma (Fig. 1A and table S3, IR3T). Three gefitinib-sensitive tumors contained heterozygous in-frame deletions (Fig. 1C and table S3, Del-3 in two cases and Del-4 in one), and one contained a homozygous inframe deletion (Fig. 1C and table S3, Del-5). Each of these deletions was found within codons 746 to 753 of EGFR, where deletions were also found in unselected tumors. Each of these three deletions is also associated with an amino acid substitution (table S3). In all four samples where matched normal tissue was available, these mutations were confirmed as somatic.

To determine whether mutations in EGFR confer gefitinib sensitivity in vitro, the mutation status and response to gefitinib were determined in four lung adenocarcinoma and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma cell lines. The H3255 cell line was originally derived from a malignant pleural effusion from a Caucasian female nonsmoker with lung adenocarcinoma (21). This cell line was 50 times as sensitive to gefitinib as the other lines, with an IC50 of 40 nM for cell survival in a 72-hour assay (Fig. 3A).


 Fig. 3.. A lung adenocarcinoma cell line with EGFR receptor mutation is sensitive to growth and signaling inhibition by gefitinib. (A) Cells were treated with gefitinib at the indicated concentrations, and viable cells were measured after 72 hours of treatment. Percentage of cell growth is shown relative to untreated controls. H3255 cells have the EGFR L858R mutation, whereas the three remaining cell lines have wild-type EGFR (WT). (B) Inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation and of downstream phosphorylation of Akt and Erk1/2. The cell lines were treated with gefitinib for 24 hours. Cell extracts were immunoblotted to detect the indicated protein species. Akt, v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog; Erk, extracellular signal-responsive kinase. [View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]
 

Treatment with 100 nM gefitinib completely inhibited EGFR autophosphorylation in H3255 (Fig. 3B). Such treatment also inhibited the phosphorylation of known down-stream targets of EGFR such as the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and the v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog (AKT kinase) (Fig. 3B), a correlation that has been noted by others (22). In contrast, the other three cell lines showed comparable levels of inhibition of target protein phosphorylation only when gefitinib was present at concentrations roughly 100 times as high (Fig. 3B).

The sequence analysis of EGFR cDNA in these four cell lines showed the L858R mutations in H3255 (table S3), whereas the other three cell lines did not contain EGFR mutations. We also confirmed the presence of the L858R mutation in the primary tumor from which H3255 was derived (table S3, IRG), although no matched normal tissue was available. The results suggest that L858R mutant EGFR is particularly sensitive to inhibition by gefitinib compared with the wild-type enzyme and that this likely accounts for the extraordinary drug sensitivity of the H3255 cell line.

The identification of EGFR mutations in a subset of human lung carcinomas and the association between EGFR mutation and gefitinib sensitivity extend the emerging paradigm whereby genetic alterations in specific kinases, and not simply kinase expression, render tumors sensitive to selective inhibitors as is the case for imatinib treatment of c-kit mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (23). Thus, although randomized trials of cytotoxic therapy with or without gefitinib revealed no survival benefit for the gefitinib-treated NSCLC patients (24, 25), our current data suggest that gefitinib may be particularly effective for treating lung cancers with somatic EGFR mutations and that prospective clinical trials of EGFR inhibition in patients with EGFR mutations might reveal increased patient survival. Identification of EGFR mutations in other malignancies, perhaps including glioblastomas in which EGFR alterations are already known (26), may identify other patients who could similarly benefit from treatment with EGFR inhibitors.

Important questions remain to be answered, including whether these alterations result in activated and transforming alleles of EGFR, whether receptors harboring such mutations will show differential sensitivity to any of the multiple EGFR small molecule inhibitors, and whether EGFR receptors harboring such mutations are inhibited by antibodies directed against the extracellular domain. Furthermore, it will be of interest to determine whether resistance to EGFR inhibition emerges through secondary mutation as is the case in imatinib-treated chronic myelogenous leukemia (27). These results should stimulate further in vitro studies regarding these questions.

Finally, the striking differences in the frequency of EGFR mutation and response to gefitinib between Japanese and U.S. patients raise general questions regarding variations in the molecular pathogenesis of cancer in different ethnic, cultural, and geographic groups and argue for the benefit of population diversity in cancer clinical trials.


References and Notes Back to Top

  1. 1"> C. L. Sawyers, Genes Dev. 17, 2998 (2003).[Free Full Text]
  2. 2"> G. D. Demetri et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 347, 472 (2002).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  3. B. J. Druker et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 1038 (2001).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  4. 4"> D. J. Slamon et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 783 (2001).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  5. 5"> H. Davies et al., Nature 417, 949 (2002).[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. 6"> A. Bardelli et al., Science 300, 949 (2003).[Free Full Text]
  7. 7"> Y. Samuels et al., Science 304, 554 (2004).[Free Full Text]
  8. 8"> A. Jemal et al., CA Cancer J. Clin. 54, 8 (2004).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. 9"> O. S. Breathnach et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 19, 1734 (2001).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. 10"> V. Rusch et al., Cancer Res. 53, 2379 (1993).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. 11"> R. Bailey et al., Lung Cancer 41 S2, S71 (2003).
  12. 12"> M. Fukuoka et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 21, 2237 (2003).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. 13"> P. A. Janne et al., Lung Cancer 44, 221 (2004).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  14. M. G. Kris et al., JAMA 290, 2149 (2003).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. 15"> V. A. Miller et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 1103 (2004).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. 16"> Materials and methods, additional data tables and figures, and additional references are available as supporting material on Science Online.
  17. 17"> M. Huse, J. Kuriyan, Cell 109, 275 (2002).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  18. 18"> K. Naoki, T. H. Chen, W. G. Richards, D. J. Sugarbaker, M. Meyerson, Cancer Res. 62, 7001 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. 19"> J. Stamos, M. X. Sliwkowski, C. Eigenbrot, J. Biol. Chem. 277, 46265 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. 20"> Note that the frequency of EGFR mutation in the unselected U.S. patients, 1 of 61, appears to be low when compared with the frequency of reported gefitinib response at 10.4%. This difference has a modest statistical significance (P = 0.025 by the chi-square test). Thus, this result could still be due to chance, to a fraction of responders who do not have EGFR mutations, or to failure to detect EGFR mutations experimentally in this tumor collection. If the frequency of EGFR mutation in gefitinib-responsive U.S. patients (5/5) is compared with the expected frequency of gefitinib response (10.4%), the chisquare probability is again less than 10–12.
  21. 21"> T. Fujishita et al., Oncology 64, 399 (2003).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  22. 22"> M. Ono et al., Mol. Cancer Ther. 3, 465 (2004).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. 23"> M. C. Heinrich et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 21, 4342 (2003).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. 24"> G. Giaccone et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 777 (2004).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. 25"> R. S. Herbst et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 785 (2004).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. 26"> H. Yamazaki et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 1816 (1988).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. 27"> M. E. Gorre et al., Science 293, 876 (2001).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. 28"> T. J. Lynch et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 2129 (2004).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  29. We thank D. Altshuler, T. Golub, P. Kantoff, D. Hill, M. Vidal, E. Lander, and D. Livingston for their advice, encouragement, and extraordinary support, and E. Lander and D. Livingston for their thoughtful comments on the manuscript. Supported by the Novartis Research Foundation, the Claudia Adams Barr Fund and the Charles A. Dana Human Cancer Genetics Program of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, the Poduska Family Foundation, the Gerhard Andlinger Fund, the Tisch Family Foundation, the Arthur and Linda Gelb Foundation, the Damon-Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, Joan's Legacy, the American Cancer Society, the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute, the National Cancer Institute Lung Specialized Programs of Research Excellence and K12 programs, and numerous generous donors to the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. M.J.E., W.R.S., and M.M. receive research funding and consulting fees from Novartis, and B.E.J. receives research funding from Eli Lilly. W.R.S. has served on the advisory board of ImClone Systems Inc. M.M. and W.R.S. have received honoraria for speaking at a meeting sponsored by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals. AstraZeneca is the manufacturer of gefitinib.

Supporting Online Material

www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1099314/DC1

Materials and Methods

Fig. S1

Tables S1 to S4

References


Received for publication 16 April 2004. Accepted for publication 21 April 2004.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Lessons Learned From Lung Cancer Genomics: The Emerging Concept of Individualized Diagnostics and Treatment.
R. Buettner, J. Wolf, and R. K. Thomas (2013)
J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 1858-1865
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Existing and Emerging Technologies for Tumor Genomic Profiling.
L. E. MacConaill (2013)
J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 1815-1824
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Personalizing Oncology: Perspectives and Prospects.
J. Mendelsohn (2013)
J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 1904-1911
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Acquired Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors Is Associated with a Manifestation of Stem Cell-like Properties in Cancer Cells.
K. Shien, S. Toyooka, H. Yamamoto, J. Soh, M. Jida, K. L. Thu, S. Hashida, Y. Maki, E. Ichihara, H. Asano, et al. (2013)
Cancer Res. 73, 3051-3061
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Impact of EGFR Inhibitor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on Progression-Free and Overall Survival: A Meta-Analysis.
C. K. Lee, C. Brown, R. J. Gralla, V. Hirsh, S. Thongprasert, C.-M. Tsai, E. H. Tan, J. C.-M. Ho, D. T. Chu, A. Zaatar, et al. (2013)
J Natl Cancer Inst 105, 595-605
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
TYK2-STAT1-BCL2 Pathway Dependence in T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
T. Sanda, J. W. Tyner, A. Gutierrez, V. N. Ngo, J. Glover, B. H. Chang, A. Yost, W. Ma, A. G. Fleischman, W. Zhou, et al. (2013)
Cancer Discovery 3, 564-577
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
De-Repression of PDGFR{beta} Transcription Promotes Acquired Resistance to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Glioblastoma Patients.
D. Akhavan, A. L. Pourzia, A. A. Nourian, K. J. Williams, D. Nathanson, I. Babic, G. R. Villa, K. Tanaka, A. Nael, H. Yang, et al. (2013)
Cancer Discovery 3, 534-547
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
High-Throughput Tyrosine Kinase Activity Profiling Identifies FAK as a Candidate Therapeutic Target in Ewing Sarcoma.
B. D. Crompton, A. L. Carlton, A. R. Thorner, A. L. Christie, J. Du, M. L. Calicchio, M. N. Rivera, M. D. Fleming, N. E. Kohl, A. L. Kung, et al. (2013)
Cancer Res. 73, 2873-2883
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
ALK Inhibitor PF02341066 (Crizotinib) Increases Sensitivity to Radiation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Expressing EML4-ALK.
Y. Sun, K. A. Nowak, N. G. Zaorsky, C.-L. Winchester, K. Dalal, N. J. Giacalone, N. Liu, M. Werner-Wasik, M. A. Wasik, A. P. Dicker, et al. (2013)
Mol. Cancer Ther. 12, 696-704
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Afatinib Prolongs Survival Compared with Gefitinib in an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Driven Lung Cancer Model.
T. Ninomiya, N. Takigawa, E. Ichihara, N. Ochi, T. Murakami, Y. Honda, T. Kubo, D. Minami, K. Kudo, M. Tanimoto, et al. (2013)
Mol. Cancer Ther. 12, 589-597
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Characteristics of Lung Cancers Harboring NRAS Mutations.
K. Ohashi, L. V. Sequist, M. E. Arcila, C. M. Lovly, X. Chen, C. M. Rudin, T. Moran, D. R. Camidge, C. L. Vnencak-Jones, L. Berry, et al. (2013)
Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 2584-2591
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
ERBB Family Mutation in Breast and Lung Cancer.
H. Greulich (2013)
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book 2013, 3-8
   Full Text »    PDF »
Gene Mutations in Squamous Cell NSCLC: Insignificance of EGFR, KRAS and PIK3CA Mutations in Prediction of EGFR-TKI Treatment Efficacy.
O. FIALA, M. PESEK, J. FINEK, L. BENESOVA, Z. BORTLICEK, and M. MINARIK (2013)
Anticancer Res 33, 1705-1711
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cancer/testis antigen expression as a predictor for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma.
T. Baba, H. Shiota, K. Kuroda, Y. Shigematsu, Y. Ichiki, H. Uramoto, T. Hanagiri, and F. Tanaka (2013)
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 43, 759-764
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Improvement in the quality of molecular analysis of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer detected by three rounds of external quality assessment.
Z. C. Deans, N. Bilbe, B. O'Sullivan, L. P. Lazarou, D. G. de Castro, S. Parry, A. Dodson, P. Taniere, C. Clark, and R. Butler (2013)
J. Clin. Pathol. 66, 319-325
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cancer Pharmacogenomics: Early Promise, But Concerted Effort Needed.
H. L. McLeod (2013)
Science 339, 1563-1566
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Then and Now.
J. H. Schiller, D. R. Gandara, G. D. Goss, and E. E. Vokes (2013)
J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 981-983
   Full Text »    PDF »
KRAS Mutation: Should We Test for It, and Does It Matter?.
P. J. Roberts and T. E. Stinchcombe (2013)
J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 1112-1121
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Treating Patients With EGFR-Sensitizing Mutations: First Line or Second Line--Is There a Difference?.
T. Mok, J.-J. Yang, and K.-C. Lam (2013)
J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 1081-1088
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Resistant Disease.
K. Ohashi, Y. E. Maruvka, F. Michor, and W. Pao (2013)
J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 1070-1080
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in Lung Adenocarcinomas: Relationship with CT Characteristics and Histologic Subtypes.
H.-J. Lee, Y. T. Kim, C. H. Kang, B. Zhao, Y. Tan, L. H. Schwartz, T. Persigehl, Y. K. Jeon, and D. H. Chung (2013)
Radiology
   Abstract »    Full Text »
EGFR polymorphisms, hormone replacement therapy and lung adenocarcinoma risk: analysis from a genome-wide association study in never-smoking women.
K.-Y. Chen, C.-F. Hsiao, G.-C. Chang, Y.-H. Tsai, W.-C. Su, Y.-M. Chen, M.-S. Huang, C. A. Hsiung, C.-J. Chen, P.-C. Yang, et al. (2013)
Carcinogenesis 34, 612-619
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 Gene Amplification Is Associated With Poor Survival and Cigarette Smoking Dosage in Patients With Resected Squamous Cell Lung Cancer.
H. R. Kim, D. J. Kim, D. R. Kang, J. G. Lee, S. M. Lim, C. Y. Lee, S. Y. Rha, M. K. Bae, Y. J. Lee, S. H. Kim, et al. (2013)
J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 731-737
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Caspase-Independent Cell Death Is Involved in the Negative Effect of EGF Receptor Inhibitors on Cisplatin in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells.
H. Yamaguchi, J. L. Hsu, C.-T. Chen, Y.-N. Wang, M.-C. Hsu, S.-S. Chang, Y. Du, H.-W. Ko, R. Herbst, and M.-C. Hung (2013)
Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 845-854
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Lactate Dehydrogenase B Is Required for the Growth of KRAS-Dependent Lung Adenocarcinomas.
M. L. McCleland, A. S. Adler, L. Deming, E. Cosino, L. Lee, E. M. Blackwood, M. Solon, J. Tao, L. Li, D. Shames, et al. (2013)
Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 773-784
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Frequent EGFR mutations in nonsmall cell lung cancer presenting with miliary intrapulmonary carcinomatosis.
S.-G. Wu, F.-C. Hu, Y.-L. Chang, Y.-C. Lee, C.-J. Yu, Y.-C. Chang, J.-Y. Wu, J.-Y. Shih, and P.-C. Yang (2013)
Eur. Respir. J. 41, 417-424
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Noncovalent Wild-type-Sparing Inhibitors of EGFR T790M.
H.-J. Lee, G. Schaefer, T. P. Heffron, L. Shao, X. Ye, S. Sideris, S. Malek, E. Chan, M. Merchant, H. La, et al. (2013)
Cancer Discovery 3, 168-181
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Activating HER2 Mutations in HER2 Gene Amplification Negative Breast Cancer.
R. Bose, S. M. Kavuri, A. C. Searleman, W. Shen, D. Shen, D. C. Koboldt, J. Monsey, N. Goel, A. B. Aronson, S. Li, et al. (2013)
Cancer Discovery 3, 224-237
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
EGFR mutation testing in lung cancer: a review of available methods and their use for analysis of tumour tissue and cytology samples.
G. Ellison, G. Zhu, A. Moulis, S. Dearden, G. Speake, and R. McCormack (2013)
J. Clin. Pathol. 66, 79-89
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Synergistic Effect of Olaparib with Combination of Cisplatin on PTEN-Deficient Lung Cancer Cells.
D. Minami, N. Takigawa, H. Takeda, M. Takata, N. Ochi, E. Ichihara, A. Hisamoto, K. Hotta, M. Tanimoto, and K. Kiura (2013)
Mol. Cancer Res. 11, 140-148
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinomas: Prevalence, Molecular Heterogeneity, and Clinicopathologic Characteristics.
M. E. Arcila, K. Nafa, J. E. Chaft, N. Rekhtman, C. Lau, B. A. Reva, M. F. Zakowski, M. G. Kris, and M. Ladanyi (2013)
Mol. Cancer Ther. 12, 220-229
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Clinically relevant cancer biomarkers and pharmacogenetic assays.
J. N. Patel, K. Mandock, and H. L. McLeod (2013)
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Resistance to Irreversible EGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors through a Multistep Mechanism Involving the IGF1R Pathway.
A. B. Cortot, C. E. Repellin, T. Shimamura, M. Capelletti, K. Zejnullahu, D. Ercan, J. G. Christensen, K.-K. Wong, N. S. Gray, and P. A. Janne (2013)
Cancer Res. 73, 834-843
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
c-Src Activation Mediates Erlotinib Resistance in Head and Neck Cancer by Stimulating c-Met.
L. P. Stabile, G. He, V. W. Y. Lui, S. M. Thomas, C. Henry, C. T. Gubish, S. Joyce, K. M. Quesnelle, J. M. Siegfried, and J. R. Grandis (2013)
Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 380-392
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Updated overall survival results from a randomized phase III trial comparing gefitinib with carboplatin-paclitaxel for chemo-naive non-small cell lung cancer with sensitive EGFR gene mutations (NEJ002).
A. Inoue, K. Kobayashi, M. Maemondo, S. Sugawara, S. Oizumi, H. Isobe, A. Gemma, M. Harada, H. Yoshizawa, I. Kinoshita, et al. (2013)
Ann. Onc. 24, 54-59
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
CellLineNavigator: a workbench for cancer cell line analysis.
M. Krupp, T. Itzel, T. Maass, A. Hildebrandt, P. R. Galle, and A. Teufel (2013)
Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D942-D948
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Kinase Pathway Dependence in Primary Human Leukemias Determined by Rapid Inhibitor Screening.
J. W. Tyner, W. F. Yang, A. Bankhead III, G. Fan, L. B. Fletcher, J. Bryant, J. M. Glover, B. H. Chang, S. E. Spurgeon, W. H. Fleming, et al. (2013)
Cancer Res. 73, 285-296
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
An Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Gene Signature Predicts Resistance to EGFR and PI3K Inhibitors and Identifies Axl as a Therapeutic Target for Overcoming EGFR Inhibitor Resistance.
L. A. Byers, L. Diao, J. Wang, P. Saintigny, L. Girard, M. Peyton, L. Shen, Y. Fan, U. Giri, P. K. Tumula, et al. (2013)
Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 279-290
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
RET Fusions Define a Unique Molecular and Clinicopathologic Subtype of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
R. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Pan, Y. Li, T. Ye, C. Li, X. Luo, L. Wang, H. Li, Y. Zhang, et al. (2012)
J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 4352-4359
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Using MicroRNAs to Inform Clinical Decision Making in Lung Cancer: Ready for Prime Time?.
A. Spira and S. P. Nana-Sinkam (2012)
186, 1077-1079
   Full Text »    PDF »
Gefitinib and Gemcitabine Coordinately Inhibited the Proliferation of Cholangiocarcinoma Cells.
Y. NAKAJIMA, H. TAKAGI, S. KAKIZAKI, N. HORIGUCHI, K. SATO, N. SUNAGA, and M. MORI (2012)
Anticancer Res 32, 5251-5262
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Repeat Biopsy for Mutational Analysis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Resistant to Previous Chemotherapy: Adequacy and Complications.
H. J. Yoon, H. Y. Lee, K. S. Lee, Y.-L. Choi, M.-J. Ahn, K. Park, J. S. Ahn, J.-M. Sun, J. Kim, T. S. Kim, et al. (2012)
Radiology 265, 939-948
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Molecular Epidemiology of EGFR and KRAS Mutations in 3,026 Lung Adenocarcinomas: Higher Susceptibility of Women to Smoking-Related KRAS-Mutant Cancers.
S. Dogan, R. Shen, D. C. Ang, M. L. Johnson, S. P. D'Angelo, P. K. Paik, E. B. Brzostowski, G. J. Riely, M. G. Kris, M. F. Zakowski, et al. (2012)
Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 6169-6177
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Impact of the Integrin Signaling Adaptor Protein NEDD9 on Prognosis and Metastatic Behavior of Human Lung Cancer.
S. Kondo, S. Iwata, T. Yamada, Y. Inoue, H. Ichihara, Y. Kichikawa, T. Katayose, A. Souta-Kuribara, H. Yamazaki, O. Hosono, et al. (2012)
Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 6326-6338
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cancer Genes in Lung Cancer: Racial Disparities: Are There Any?.
A. El-Telbany and P. C. Ma (2012)
Genes & Cancer
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Fluorescent signatures for variable DNA sequences.
J. E. Rice, A. H. Reis Jr, L. M. Rice, R. K. Carver-Brown, and L. J. Wangh (2012)
Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e164
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Utility of Hypertension as a Surrogate Marker for Efficacy of Antiangiogenic Therapy in NSCLC.
T. EVANS (2012)
Anticancer Res 32, 4629-4638
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Translating genomic information into clinical medicine: Lung cancer as a paradigm.
M. A. Levy, C. M. Lovly, and W. Pao (2012)
Genome Res. 22, 2101-2108
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Predictors of Survival in Never-Smokers with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Large-Scale, Two-Phase Genetic Study.
X. Pu, Y. Ye, M. R. Spitz, L. Wang, J. Gu, S. M. Lippman, M. A. T. Hildebrandt, W. K. Hong, J. D. Minna, J. A. Roth, et al. (2012)
Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 5983-5991
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Mechanism of Drug Efficacy Within the EGF Receptor Revealed by Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulation.
S. Wan, D. W. Wright, and P. V. Coveney (2012)
Mol. Cancer Ther. 11, 2394-2400
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Crizotinib for the Treatment of ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Success Story to Usher in the Second Decade of Molecular Targeted Therapy in Oncology.
S.-H. I. Ou, C. H. Bartlett, M. Mino-Kenudson, J. Cui, and A. J. Iafrate (2012)
Oncologist 17, 1351-1375
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
A framework for identification of actionable cancer genome dependencies in small cell lung cancer.
M. L. Sos, F. Dietlein, M. Peifer, J. Schottle, H. Balke-Want, C. Muller, M. Koker, A. Richters, S. Heynck, F. Malchers, et al. (2012)
PNAS 109, 17034-17039
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
D. S. Ettinger, W. Akerley, H. Borghaei, A. C. Chang, R. T. Cheney, L. R. Chirieac, T. A. D'Amico, T. L. Demmy, A. K. P. Ganti, R. Govindan, et al. (2012)
J Natl Compr Canc Netw 10, 1236-1271
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Reactivation of ERK Signaling Causes Resistance to EGFR Kinase Inhibitors.
D. Ercan, C. Xu, M. Yanagita, C. S. Monast, C. A. Pratilas, J. Montero, M. Butaney, T. Shimamura, L. Sholl, E. V. Ivanova, et al. (2012)
Cancer Discovery 2, 934-947
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
HER2 Amplification: A Potential Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to EGFR Inhibition in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers That Lack the Second-Site EGFRT790M Mutation.
K. Takezawa, V. Pirazzoli, M. E. Arcila, C. A. Nebhan, X. Song, E. de Stanchina, K. Ohashi, Y. Y. Janjigian, P. J. Spitzler, M. A. Melnick, et al. (2012)
Cancer Discovery 2, 922-933
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Rescue Screens with Secreted Proteins Reveal Compensatory Potential of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Driving Cancer Growth.
F. Harbinski, V. J. Craig, S. Sanghavi, D. Jeffery, L. Liu, K. A. Sheppard, S. Wagner, C. Stamm, A. Buness, C. Chatenay-Rivauday, et al. (2012)
Cancer Discovery 2, 948-959
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Clinical Outcomes of Thoracic Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced NSCLC with EGFR Mutations or EML4-ALK Rearrangement.
H. HAYASHI, I. OKAMOTO, H. KIMURA, K. SAKAI, Y. NISHIMURA, K. NISHIO, and K. NAKAGAWA (2012)
Anticancer Res 32, 4533-4537
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Lesions in patients with multifocal adenocarcinoma are more frequently in the right upper lobes.
H. Kaneda, Y. Uemura, T. Nakano, Y. Taniguchi, T. Saito, T. Konobu, and Y. Saito (2012)
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 15, 627-632
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Threonine 2609 Phosphorylation of the DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Is a Critical Prerequisite for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mediated Radiation Resistance.
P. Javvadi, H. Makino, A. K. Das, Y.-F. Lin, D. J. Chen, B. P. Chen, and C. S. Nirodi (2012)
Mol. Cancer Res. 10, 1359-1368
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Timing of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutations.
T. Moran and L. V. Sequist (2012)
J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 3330-3336
   Full Text »    PDF »
Functional analysis of receptor tyrosine kinase mutations in lung cancer identifies oncogenic extracellular domain mutations of ERBB2.
H. Greulich, B. Kaplan, P. Mertins, T.-H. Chen, K. E. Tanaka, C.-H. Yun, X. Zhang, S.-H. Lee, J. Cho, L. Ambrogio, et al. (2012)
PNAS 109, 14476-14481
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Molecular Pathology of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Practical Guide.
D. L. Aisner and C. B. Marshall (2012)
Am J Clin Pathol 138, 332-346
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Analysis With a Highly Sensitive Molecular Assay in Routine Cytologic Specimens of Lung Adenocarcinoma.
S. Allegrini, J. Antona, R. Mezzapelle, U. Miglio, A. Paganotti, C. Veggiani, M. Frattini, G. Monga, P. Balbo, and R. Boldorini (2012)
Am J Clin Pathol 138, 377-381
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Influence of Chemotherapy on EGFR Mutation Status Among Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
H. Bai, Z. Wang, K. Chen, J. Zhao, J. J. Lee, S. Wang, Q. Zhou, M. Zhuo, L. Mao, T. An, et al. (2012)
J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 3077-3083
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Proteomic Profiling Identifies Dysregulated Pathways in Small Cell Lung Cancer and Novel Therapeutic Targets Including PARP1.
L. A. Byers, J. Wang, M. B. Nilsson, J. Fujimoto, P. Saintigny, J. Yordy, U. Giri, M. Peyton, Y. H. Fan, L. Diao, et al. (2012)
Cancer Discovery 2, 798-811
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Induction chemotherapy followed by gefitinib and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung: a multicenter feasibility study (JCOG 0402).
S. Niho, Y. Ohe, S. Ishikura, S. Atagi, A. Yokoyama, Y. Ichinose, H. Okamoto, K. Takeda, T. Shibata, T. Tamura, et al. (2012)
Ann. Onc. 23, 2253-2258
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
KRASG12D- and BRAFV600E-Induced Transformation of Murine Pancreatic Epithelial Cells Requires MEK/ERK-Stimulated IGF1R Signaling.
V. A. Appleman, L. G. Ahronian, J. Cai, D. S. Klimstra, and B. C. Lewis (2012)
Mol. Cancer Res. 10, 1228-1239
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and derived treatments.
R. Dziadziuszko and J. Jassem (2012)
Ann. Onc. 23, x193-x196
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
First-Line Erlotinib Followed by Second-Line Cisplatin-Gemcitabine Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The TORCH Randomized Trial.
C. Gridelli, F. Ciardiello, C. Gallo, R. Feld, C. Butts, V. Gebbia, P. Maione, F. Morgillo, G. Genestreti, A. Favaretto, et al. (2012)
J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 3002-3011
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Analysis of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase ROS1-Positive Tumors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Identification of a FIG-ROS1 Fusion.
V. M. Rimkunas, K. E. Crosby, D. Li, Y. Hu, M. E. Kelly, T.-L. Gu, J. S. Mack, M. R. Silver, X. Zhou, and H. Haack (2012)
Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 4449-4457
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The Impact of Initial Gefitinib or Erlotinib versus Chemotherapy on Central Nervous System Progression in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutations.
S. Heon, B. Y. Yeap, N. I. Lindeman, V. A. Joshi, M. Butaney, G. J. Britt, D. B. Costa, M. S. Rabin, D. M. Jackman, and B. E. Johnson (2012)
Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 4406-4414
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Network-based drug discovery by integrating systems biology and computational technologies.
E. L. Leung, Z.-W. Cao, Z.-H. Jiang, H. Zhou, and L. Liu (2012)
Brief Bioinform
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Research Resource: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Nuclear Receptor Expression in Lung Cancer.
Y. Jeong, Y. Xie, W. Lee, A. L. Bookout, L. Girard, G. Raso, C. Behrens, I. I. Wistuba, A. F. Gadzar, J. D. Minna, et al. (2012)
Mol. Endocrinol. 26, 1443-1454
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Lung cancers with acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors occasionally harbor BRAF gene mutations but lack mutations in KRAS, NRAS, or MEK1.
K. Ohashi, L. V. Sequist, M. E. Arcila, T. Moran, J. Chmielecki, Y.-L. Lin, Y. Pan, L. Wang, E. de Stanchina, K. Shien, et al. (2012)
PNAS 109, E2127-E2133
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Oncogenic cooperation between SOCS family proteins and EGFR identified using a Drosophila epithelial transformation model.
H. Herranz, X. Hong, N. T. Hung, P. M. Voorhoeve, and S. M. Cohen (2012)
Genes & Dev. 26, 1602-1611
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Ultrasensitive Measurement of Hotspot Mutations in Tumor DNA in Blood Using Error-Suppressed Multiplexed Deep Sequencing.
A. Narayan, N. J. Carriero, S. N. Gettinger, J. Kluytenaar, K. R. Kozak, T. I. Yock, N. E. Muscato, P. Ugarelli, R. H. Decker, and A. A. Patel (2012)
Cancer Res. 72, 3492-3498
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
EGFR and K-ras mutations in cytologic samples from fine-needle aspirates in NSCLC patients.
P. Ulivi, W. Zoli, E. Chiadini, L. Capelli, P. Candoli, D. Calistri, R. Silvestrini, and M. Puccetti (2012)
Eur. Respir. J. 40, 267-269
   Full Text »    PDF »
Combining chemotherapy with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
L. Leung, T. S. K. Mok, and H. Loong (2012)
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology 4, 173-181
   Abstract »    PDF »
Combined EGFR/MET or EGFR/HSP90 Inhibition Is Effective in the Treatment of Lung Cancers Codriven by Mutant EGFR Containing T790M and MET.
L. Xu, E. Kikuchi, C. Xu, H. Ebi, D. Ercan, K. A. Cheng, R. Padera, J. A. Engelman, P. A. Janne, G. I. Shapiro, et al. (2012)
Cancer Res. 72, 3302-3311
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Authors' response: 'Focusing on HER2 as a potential therapeutic target in primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas'.
B. Yan and G. S. D. Lim (2012)
J. Clin. Pathol. 65, 671-672
   Full Text »    PDF »
Complex Role of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
J. W. Neal and L. V. Sequist (2012)
J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 2280-2282
   Full Text »    PDF »
Clinical Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Harboring Different Exon 19 Deletions in EGFR.
K.-P. Chung, S.-G. Wu, J.-Y. Wu, J. C.-H. Yang, C.-J. Yu, P.-F. Wei, J.-Y. Shih, and P.-C. Yang (2012)
Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 3470-3477
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib Alone or With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients Who Were Never or Light Former Smokers With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: CALGB 30406 Trial.
P. A. Janne, X. Wang, M. A. Socinski, J. Crawford, T. E. Stinchcombe, L. Gu, M. Capelletti, M. J. Edelman, M. A. Villalona-Calero, R. Kratzke, et al. (2012)
J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 2063-2069
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »

To Advertise     Find Products


Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882