Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Subscribe

Logo for

Science 309 (5731): 142-145

Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science

Variable Control of Ets-1 DNA Binding by Multiple Phosphates in an Unstructured Region

Miles A. Pufall,1 Gregory M. Lee,2 Mary L. Nelson,1 Hyun-Seo Kang,2 Algirdas Velyvis,3 Lewis E. Kay,3 Lawrence P. McIntosh,2 Barbara J. Graves1*

Abstract: Cell signaling that culminates in posttranslational modifications directs protein activity. Here we report how multiple Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation sites within the transcription activator Ets-1 act additively to produce graded DNA binding affinity. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic analyses show that phosphorylation shifts Ets-1 from a dynamic conformation poised to bind DNA to a well-folded inhibited state. These phosphates lie in an unstructured flexible region that functions as the allosteric effector of autoinhibition. Variable phosphorylation thus serves as a "rheostat" for cell signaling to fine-tune transcription at the level of DNA binding.

1 Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112–5550, USA.
2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Chemistry, and The Michael Smith Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
3 Departments of Medical Genetics, Biochemistry, and Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Barbara.Graves{at}hci.utah.edu

Proteins are activated or repressed by post-translational modifications in response to extracellular cues. Phosphorylation, a typical modification, often accumulates at multiple sites until a threshold level is reached. The outcome is described as a sharp on/off switch of protein activity (1, 2). However, biological processes may need more sensitive regulation. Despite this need, variable regulation of protein activity in response to multiple modifications has not been documented. Here we show how the transcription factor Ets-1 exhibits graded DNA binding activity with different levels of phosphorylation.


 Fig. 1.. Differential phosphorylation of Ets-1 leads to variable DNA binding affinity. (A) NMR-derived structure of the partially active Ets-1 truncation {Delta}N301, showing the ETS domain (red) and inhibitory helices (purple) (8). (B) Crystallographic structure of DNA-bound {Delta}N280, showing inhibitory helix HI-1 unfolded (31). (C) Schematic secondary structure of {Delta}N244 with SRR (yellow) and sites phosphorylated by CaMKII in vitro (labeled P) as determined by mass spectrometry and/or NMR for the wild type and mutants. Boxed phosphoserines are critical for the reinforcement of autoinhibition. Additional phosphates have negligible individual effects and vary with mutation pattern (32). (D) Relative phosphorylation-induced inhibition = KD(phosphorylated mutant)/KD(unmodified mutant) with the standard error of the ratio (n ≥ 4 replicas) (15). Single mutants are colored red and double mutants are colored yellow. The quadruple mutant (gray) (11) provides expected data for the disruption of three critical phosphoacceptor sites (251, 282, and 285). (E) {Delta}{Delta}{Delta}Gobinding = –RTln(relative induced inhibition, {Delta}N244) + RT ln(relative induced inhibition, mutant), where R is the ideal gas constant and T is temperature, is plotted as a function of the number of phosphoacceptor mutations (wild type, exes; single, squares; double, triangles; triple, circle). The linear relationship (correlation coefficient r = 0.96) implicates additivity of mutational effects (33). [View Larger Version of this Image (32K GIF file)]
 
Ets-1 is regulated by an autoinhibitory module composed of four {alpha} helices (HI-1, HI-2, H4, and H5) that flank the DNA-binding ETS domain. In the native protein, these helices pack cooperatively on a surface of the ETS domain that is opposite to the DNA binding interface (Fig. 1A), reducing the affinity of Ets-1 for DNA 10-fold, compared with the affinity of the minimal ETS domain (35). This inhibitory module opposes the structural change that accompanies DNA binding, the most striking feature of which is the unfolding of inhibitory helix HI-1 (Fig. 1B) (3, 68). Recent nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic studies indicate that helix HI-1 is labile, even in the absence of DNA, and could serve as a control point for modulating DNA binding affinity (8). Cooperative DNA binding with runt-related protein 1 (RUNX1) counteracts autoinhibition, activating the binding of native Ets-1 ~10-fold (9), whereas Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation of Ets-1 at multiple sites reinforces autoinhibition by lowering DNA affinity ~50-fold further to an overall inhibition of 500- to 1000-fold (fig. S1, A to D) (10, 11). The modulation of Ets-1 DNA binding is correlated with transcriptional activity in in vivo assays and is responsive to cellular cues (1214). For example, Ca2+ signaling in vivo disrupts Ets-1 DNA binding and reduces the transcription of Ets-1–driven reporters (13). We show that this multiple phosphorylation is not simply an on/off switch, but rather an incremental rheostat-like control for Ets-1 binding activity.

We used a minimal fragment, {Delta}N244, which displays the DNA binding properties of full-length Ets-1 (fig. S1, A to D) (11, 15). {Delta}N2445P, a form which is homogenously phosphorylated by CaMKII, contains five specific phosphoserines in the serine-rich region (SRR, residues 244 to 300) (Fig. 1C) and appears to undergo the same structural transition upon DNA binding as do unmodified {Delta}N244 (fig. S1E) and other Ets-1 species (3, 7, 11).

In cells, Ets-1 is variably phosphorylated in response to Ca2+ release (10). To gauge the effect of differential phosphorylation on activity, we mimicked in vivo phosphorylation by mutating phosphoacceptor serines to alanines singly and in pairs (Fig. 1C), and we then measured the DNA binding affinity of phosphorylated and unmodified forms. Mutation of three (251, 282, and 285) of the five serines, but not two others (270 and 273), significantly reduced inhibition. Furthermore, mutation of one, two, or all three critical sites (11) yielded a graded reduction in phosphorylation-dependent inhibition (Fig. 1D), with each phosphate contributing additively to the change in the free energy of binding (Fig. 1E). This finding shows that the number and context of sites, and not simply a buildup of charge, affects inhibition. Thus, in contrast to proteins such as Sic1 (2) and NFAT1 (nuclear factor of activated T cells) (1, 16), for which a threshold level of phosphorylation serves as a binary switch, multiple sites within Ets-1 regulate DNA binding in a graded manner across a wide range of affinities, which is consistent with observed variable regulation in vivo (13).

The phosphorylated SRR was found to be predominantly unstructured and highly flexible. Based on main-chain 1H and 13C chemical shifts, NMR spectra revealed no predominant secondary structure within this region (17) (Fig. 2A), and the amide hydrogen exchange (HX) rates were comparable to those of a random coil polypeptide (Fig. 2B). Further, NMR relaxation experiments demonstrated a high degree of backbone conformational mobility on nanosecond to picosecond time scales (Fig. 2C). Thus, the dynamic phosphorylated SRR may impart variable regulation of DNA binding by making transient interactions with the remainder of the protein.


 Fig. 2.. The phosphorylated SRR is predominantly unstructured and flexible. Panels present data for residues 244 to 320 of {Delta}N2445P (15). Circles and P denote the five phosphoserines. Missing data correspond to prolines, or residues with spectral overlap and/or weak signals. (A) In contrast to HI-1, differences between the observed and random coil (13C{alpha}-13Cß) chemical shifts indicated an absence of any detectable secondary structure in the SRR (17). (B) Small protection factors (kpred/kex) demonstrate that backbone SRR amides undergo HX at rates (kex) similar to those predicted for a random coil polypeptide (kpred). Amides within HI-1 do not show measurable HX by the CLEANEX method (kex < 0.5 s–1, protection factors > 80). (C) Small or negative heteronuclear 1H{15N} nuclear Overhauser enhancement values indicate a high degree of flexibility. The horizontal line at 0.4 marks an approximate boundary between flexible (below) and rigid (above) amides on a subnanosecond time scale (34). [View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]
 

Despite this flexibility, the SRR has a profound impact on the structure, stability, and dynamics of the DNA binding domain and on the inhibitory helices. We compared three Ets-1 fragments with increasing levels of inhibition: partially activated {Delta}N301; {Delta}N280, a minimal fragment that recapitulates unmodified autoinhibited Ets-1 binding; and {Delta}N2445P (dissociation constants KD ~10–11, 10–10, and 10–8 M, respectively) (fig. S1, A, B, and D) (6, 8, 18). The comparison of 1H-15N heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) spectra detected significant changes in backbone amide chemical shifts for ~25 residues common to the three species, indicative of structural perturbations (figs. S2 and S3 and table S1). The labile inhibitory helix HI-1 and helices H1 and H3 of the DNA binding domain were most widely affected. The perturbed residues, many of which are nonpolar, form a hydrophobic network connecting the inhibitory elements and the DNA binding interface (Fig. 3A). Mutation of leucine-429 to alanine within this network reduced autoinhibition and impaired phosphorylation reinforcement (fig. S1C) (5, 11), indicating that the integrity of this hydrophobic network is required for regulation.


 Fig. 3.. Autoinhibition and phosphorylation regulate binding by shifting the conformational equilibrium of a hydrophobic network. Comparison of 1H to 15N HSQC spectra of {Delta}N301 (green), {Delta}N280 (black), and {Delta}N2445P (red) revealed colinear chemical shift perturbations among ~25 common residues in the three species (table S1 and fig. S3) (15). (A) Shifted residues depicted on the NMR-derived structure of {Delta}N301 by van der Waals surfaces (8). (B) Spectral overlays highlight the progressive shift changes (black exes and dashed lines) for G302, L341, and Y395 (20). (C) Peaks from six phosphorylated phosphoacceptor mutants follow the same colinear chemical shift pattern (between {Delta}N280 and {Delta}N2445P peaks on dashed lines). (D) Color key and consensus relative peak positions. [View Larger Version of this Image (49K GIF file)]
 

A striking linear pattern of change was observed from {Delta}N301 to {Delta}N280 to {Delta}N2445P in the amide 1H and 15N chemical shifts of almost all of the affected residues (Fig. 3B and table S1). This progressive colinear pattern is a signature of an allosterically regulated molecule that is in conformational equilibrium between at least two states, with the intermediate chemical shifts representing a population-weighted average of these states (19). Based on the correlation between the linear pattern of amide chemical shifts with DNA binding affinity (20), we propose that free Ets-1 exists in equilibrium between an active state (represented most closely by {Delta}N301), which is poised to bind DNA, and an inactive state (represented by {Delta}N2445P). According to this allosteric model, Ets-1 DNA binding affinity reflects the balance of these two states.

A comparison of the backbone amide chemical shifts of phosphorylated {Delta}N244 with single or double serine-to-alanine mutations also revealed a colinear shifting pattern between {Delta}N280 and {Delta}N2445P in at least 16 of the 25 residues within the aforementioned hydrophobic network. The position of the chemical shifts for each species, phosphorylated at the remaining CaMKII sites, roughly correlated with affinity. This finding emphasizes the context dependence of each phosphate and suggests that each has a distinct role in modulating the conformational equilibrium (Fig. 3, C and D, and table S1). These NMR studies show that differential phosphorylation regulates DNA binding by fine-tuning the balance between the active and inactive states of Ets-1.

Amide HX experiments helped characterize the dynamics of the active and inactive states (Fig. 4, A to C, and fig. S4). Consistent with previous studies (8), backbone amides within the inhibitory helices HI-1 and HI-2, as well as the DNA binding helix H3 of the active {Delta}N301, exhibited limited protection from exchange, indicating that these helices sample locally unfolded conformations even in the absence of DNA. In contrast, the same amides exhibited elevated HX protection within {Delta}N280, and further in {Delta}N2445P, suggestive of a progressively less dynamic and more stably folded species. The dynamic active state and more stable inactive state are consistent with previous studies, showing that affinity for DNA decreases as the propensity of helix HI-1 to unfold decreases (3, 7, 11).


 Fig. 4.. Concerted motion of the hydrophobic network is dampened by autoinhibition and phosphorylation. {Delta}N301 (A and D), {Delta}N280 (B and E), and {Delta}N2445P (C and F) were analyzed by amide HX and backbone and side-chain relaxation dispersion (15). Relative values (figs. S4 to S6) are highlighted on the NMR-derived structure of {Delta}N301 (8). [(A), (B), and (C)] For backbone HX, amides exhibiting measurable exchange (kex > 0.5 s–1) are depicted by green balls with diameters scaled according to increasing kex. [(D), (E), and (F)] For relaxation dispersion, backbone and Trp side-chain nitrogens (red balls) and 13CmethylsofIle{delta}1, Val, and Leu (blueballs) with Rex ≥ 2 s–1 are shown, where the diameter of the balls increases in proportion to Rex at 800 MHz (the largest balls correspond to Rex ≥ 15 s–1). Pink balls represent atoms whose NMR signals are broadened beyond detection. Ile, Leu, and Val side chains are shown as green sticks. [View Larger Version of this Image (49K GIF file)]
 

A dynamic connection between the autoinhibitory module and the DNA binding interface was demonstrated by NMR backbone amide and side-chain methyl relaxation dispersion measurements (Fig. 4, D to F, and figs. S5 and S6) (21). The contribution of millisecond to microsecond time scale motions to linewidth broadening, denoted Rex, is indicative of conformational switching. Consistent with previous studies (8), the backbone amides of {Delta}N301 exhibited mobility on this time scale (exchange lifetimes {tau}ex ~0.3 ms) for residues that shift colinearly between {Delta}N301, {Delta}N280, and {Delta}N2445P. These motions were dampened in {Delta}N280, and further in {Delta}N2445P (Fig. 4, red balls). 13C methyl relaxation dispersion of Leu, Ile, and Val side chains within the hydrophobic network of {Delta}N301 showed motions on the same time scale ({tau}ex ~0.3 ms) that again were progressively reduced in {Delta}N280 and {Delta}N2445P (Fig. 4, blue balls). These data indicate that the core hydrophobic packing of Ets-1 is dynamic in the active state and that increasing inhibition attenuates these motions. Localized collective motions on a similar time scale within both the backbone and side chains support our proposal that the inhibitory module, DNA binding interface, and hydrophobic core form a concerted unit that is linked as a dynamic hydrophobic network. Furthermore, the HX and Rex data are consistent with a conformational equilibrium within this concerted unit between at least two states: one stable and inactive, another more dynamic and active.

The dynamic character of Ets-1 is likely essential for sequence-specific DNA binding but also provides an opportunity for regulation (22, 23). NMR studies of the Escherichia coli lactose repressor protein suggest that fluctuations on a millisecond to microsecond time scale are necessary for facilitated diffusion on nonspecific DNA, as well as facile adoption of a specifically bound conformation (24). The active state of Ets-1 is similarly poised to adopt a high-affinity interaction with DNA. In this case, signal-dependent phosphorylation employs these motions to vary activity in a graded manner.

The surprising use of a highly flexible segment in the graded regulation of Ets-1 DNA binding adds to the growing recognition of the role of unstructured protein regions in biology (25). These flexible elements often display posttranslational modifications [for example, MAPK Ets-1 phosphorylation (26), histone tails (27), and SH2 domain targets (28)], tether independent domains [for example, protein kinase A (PKA) (29)], or require folding for activity [for example, the cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate response element binding protein (CREB) and the CREB binding protein (30)]. The highly mobile SRR demonstrates a role for unstructured protein segments in integrating signals that direct the variable regulation of protein activity.


References and Notes Back to Top

  1. 1"> C. Salazar, T. Höfer, J. Mol. Biol. 327, 31 (2003).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  2. 2"> S. Orlicky, X. Tang, A. Willems, M. Tyers, F. Sicheri, Cell 112, 243 (2003).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  3. 3"> J. M. Petersen et al., Science 269, 1866 (1995).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. M. D. Jonsen, J. M. Petersen, Q. Xu, B. J. Graves, Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2065 (1996).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. 5"> H. Wang, L. P. McIntosh, B. J. Graves, J. Biol. Chem. 277, 2225 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. 6"> J. J. Skalicky, L. W. Donaldson, J. M. Petersen, B. J. Graves, L. P. McIntosh, Prot. Science 5, 296 (1996). [Web of Science][Medline]
  7. 7"> C. W. Garvie, M. A. Pufall, B. J. Graves, C. Wolberger, J. Biol. Chem. 277, 45529 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. 8"> G. M. Lee et al., J. Biol. Chem. 280, 7088 (2005).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. 9"> T. L. Goetz, T. L. Gu, N. A. Speck, B. J. Graves, Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 81 (2000).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. 10"> B. Rabault, J. Ghysdael, J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28143 (1994).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. 11"> D. O. Cowley, B. J. Graves, Genes Dev. 14, 366 (2000).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. 12"> D. Baillat, A. Bègue, D. Stéhelin, M. Aumercier, J. Biol. Chem. 277, 29386 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. 13"> H. Liu, T. Grundström, Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 4497 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. 14"> W. Sun, B. J. Graves, N. A. Speck, J. Virol. 69, 4941 (1995).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. 15"> Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
  16. 16"> H. Okamura et al., Mol. Cell 6, 539 (2000).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  17. 17"> D. S. Wishart, B. D. Sykes, J. Biomol. NMR 4, 171 (1994). [Web of Science][Medline]
  18. 18"> Limited solubility of {Delta}N244 prevented assignment of resonances within the molecule. However, the HSQC spectra of {Delta}N244 and {Delta}N280 were essentially superimposable.
  19. 19"> B. F. Volkman, D. Lipson, D. E. Wemmer, D. Kern, Science 291, 2429 (2001).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. 20"> The series does not adhere strictly to a two-state model because the position of {Delta}N280 does not scale consistently with activity at every residue. Nevertheless, the mean relative change in chemical shift [|{delta}({Delta}N301 – {Delta}N280)|]/[|{delta}({Delta}N301 – {Delta}N2445P|)] is 67 ± 16% for 25 residues, consistent with 80% estimated from affinity (15).
  21. 21"> F. A. Mulder, A. Mittermaier, B. Hon, F. W. Dahlquist, L. E. Kay, Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 932 (2001).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  22. 22"> V. A. Feher, J. Cavanagh, Nature 400, 289 (1999).[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. 23"> D. Kern, E. R. Zuiderweg, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13, 748 (2003).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  24. 24"> C. G. Kalodimos et al., Science 305, 386 (2004).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. 25"> P. E. Wright, H. J. Dyson, J. Mol. Biol. 293, 321 (1999).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  26. 26"> C. M. Slupsky et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 12129 (1998).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. 27"> B. P. Hudson, M. A. Martinez-Yamout, H. J. Dyson, P. E. Wright, J. Mol. Biol. 304, 355 (2000).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  28. 28"> P. J. Finerty Jr., A. K. Mittermaier, R. Muhandiram, L. E. Kay, J. D. Forman-Kay, Biochemistry 44, 694 (2005).[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. 29"> C. Kim, N. H. Xuong, S. S. Taylor, Science 307, 690 (2005).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. 30"> I. Radhakrishnan et al., Cell 91, 741 (1997).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  31. 31"> C. W. Garvie, J. Hagman, C. Wolberger, Mol. Cell 8, 1267 (2001).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  32. 32"> Single-letter abbreviations for the amino acid residues are as follows: A, Ala; C, Cys; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe; G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile; K, Lys; L, Leu; M, Met; N, Asn; P, Pro; Q, Gln; R, Arg; S, Ser; T, Thr; V, Val; W, Trp; and Y, Tyr.
  33. 33"> J. A. Wells, Biochemistry 29, 8509 (1990).[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. 34"> L. E. Kay, D. A. Torchia, A. Bax, Biochemistry 28, 8972 (1989).[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. We acknowledge support from NIH grant R01 GM38663 (B.J.G.); NIH grants T32-CA93247 and -GM08537 (M.A.P.); P01-CA24014 (Huntsman Cancer Institute) and the U.S. Department of Energy and the Huntsman Cancer Foundation (B.J.G.); the National Cancer Institute of Canada with funds from the Canadian Cancer Society (L.P.M.); the Government of Canada's Network of Centres of Excellence Program supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council through the Protein Engineering Network of Centres of Excellence (L.P.M. and L.E.K.); and the CIHR for a Scientist Award (L.P.M.) and funding (L.E.K.). L.E.K. holds a Canada Research Chair in Biochemistry.

Supporting Online Material

www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/309/5731/142/DC1

Materials and Methods

Figs. S1 to S6

Table S1

References


Received for publication 7 March 2005. Accepted for publication 11 May 2005.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Tyrosyl phosphorylation toggles a Runx1 switch.
B. G. Neel and N. A. Speck (2012)
Genes & Dev. 26, 1520-1526
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Confirming the Functional Importance of a Protein-DNA Interaction.
M. F. Carey, C. L. Peterson, and S. T. Smale (2012)
Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2012, pdb.top070060
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Structural activation of the transcriptional repressor EthR from Mycobacterium tuberculosis by single amino acid change mimicking natural and synthetic ligands.
X. Carette, N. Blondiaux, E. Willery, S. Hoos, N. Lecat-Guillet, Z. Lens, A. Wohlkonig, R. Wintjens, S. H. Soror, F. Frenois, et al. (2012)
Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 3018-3030
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
ETS1 transcriptional activity is increased in advanced prostate cancer and promotes the castrate-resistant phenotype.
A. M. Smith, V. J. Findlay, S. G. Bandurraga, E. Kistner-Griffin, L. S. Spruill, A. Liu, A. R. Golshayan, and D. P. Turner (2012)
Carcinogenesis 33, 572-580
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Identification of cis elements necessary for glucocorticoid induction of growth hormone gene expression in chicken embryonic pituitary cells.
K. Heuck-Knubel, M. Proszkowiec-Weglarz, J. Narayana, L. E. Ellestad, N. Prakobsaeng, and T. E. Porter (2012)
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 302, R606-R619
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Interaction of Ets-1 with HDAC1 Represses IL-10 Expression in Th1 Cells.
C.-G. Lee, H.-K. Kwon, A. Sahoo, W. Hwang, J.-S. So, J.-S. Hwang, C.-S. Chae, G.-C. Kim, J.-E. Kim, H.-S. So, et al. (2012)
J. Immunol. 188, 2244-2253
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Phosphorylation of a PDZ Domain Extension Modulates Binding Affinity and Interdomain Interactions in Postsynaptic Density-95 (PSD-95) Protein, a Membrane-associated Guanylate Kinase (MAGUK).
J. Zhang, C. M. Petit, D. S. King, and A. L. Lee (2011)
J. Biol. Chem. 286, 41776-41785
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cell cycle-regulated multi-site phosphorylation of Neurogenin 2 coordinates cell cycling with differentiation during neurogenesis.
F. Ali, C. Hindley, G. McDowell, R. Deibler, A. Jones, M. Kirschner, F. Guillemot, and A. Philpott (2011)
Development 138, 4267-4277
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
c-Abl-Mediated Tyrosine Phosphorylation of the T-bet DNA-Binding Domain Regulates CD4+ T-Cell Differentiation and Allergic Lung Inflammation.
A. Chen, S.-M. Lee, B. Gao, S. Shannon, Z. Zhu, and D. Fang (2011)
Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 3445-3456
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Tunable Membrane Binding of the Intrinsically Disordered Dehydrin Lti30, a Cold-Induced Plant Stress Protein.
S. K. Eriksson, M. Kutzer, J. Procek, G. Grobner, and P. Harryson (2011)
PLANT CELL 23, 2391-2404
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Dynamically committed, uncommitted, and quenched states encoded in protein kinase A revealed by NMR spectroscopy.
L. R. Masterson, L. Shi, E. Metcalfe, J. Gao, S. S. Taylor, and G. Veglia (2011)
PNAS 108, 6969-6974
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Graded enhancement of p53 binding to CREB-binding protein (CBP) by multisite phosphorylation.
C. W. Lee, J. C. Ferreon, A. C. M. Ferreon, M. Arai, and P. E. Wright (2010)
PNAS 107, 19290-19295
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Control of Activating Transcription Factor 4 (ATF4) Persistence by Multisite Phosphorylation Impacts Cell Cycle Progression and Neurogenesis.
C. L. Frank, X. Ge, Z. Xie, Y. Zhou, and L.-H. Tsai (2010)
J. Biol. Chem. 285, 33324-33337
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Local control of a disorder-order transition in 4E-BP1 underpins regulation of translation via eIF4E.
S. Tait, K. Dutta, D. Cowburn, J. Warwicker, A. J. Doig, and J. E. G. McCarthy (2010)
PNAS 107, 17627-17632
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Transcriptional silencing of the ETS1 oncogene contributes to human granulocytic differentiation.
V. Lulli, P. Romania, R. Riccioni, A. Boe, F. Lo-Coco, U. Testa, and G. Marziali (2010)
Haematologica 95, 1633-1641
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
DNA Binding by the ETS Protein TEL (ETV6) Is Regulated by Autoinhibition and Self-association.
S. M. Green, H. J. Coyne III, L. P. McIntosh, and B. J. Graves (2010)
J. Biol. Chem. 285, 18496-18504
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Emergent Properties of EWS/FLI Regulation via GGAA Microsatellites in Ewing's Sarcoma.
K. Gangwal, D. Close, C. A. Enriquez, C. P. Hill, and S. L. Lessnick (2010)
Genes & Cancer 1, 177-187
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Regulating transcription regulators via allostery and flexibility.
D. Beckett (2009)
PNAS 106, 22035-22036
   Full Text »    PDF »
The transcription factor Ets1 is important for CD4 repression and Runx3 up-regulation during CD8 T cell differentiation in the thymus.
M. Zamisch, L. Tian, R. Grenningloh, Y. Xiong, K. F. Wildt, M. Ehlers, I-C. Ho, and R. Bosselut (2009)
J. Exp. Med. 206, 2685-2699
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
An age-related homeostasis mechanism is essential for spontaneous amelioration of hemophilia B Leyden.
S. Kurachi, J. S. Huo, A. Ameri, K. Zhang, A. C. Yoshizawa, and K. Kurachi (2009)
PNAS 106, 7921-7926
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Regulation of C-type Lectin Antimicrobial Activity by a Flexible N-terminal Prosegment.
S. Mukherjee, C. L. Partch, R. E. Lehotzky, C. V. Whitham, H. Chu, C. L. Bevins, K. H. Gardner, and L. V. Hooper (2009)
J. Biol. Chem. 284, 4881-4888
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Dynamic equilibrium engagement of a polyvalent ligand with a single-site receptor.
T. Mittag, S. Orlicky, W.-Y. Choy, X. Tang, H. Lin, F. Sicheri, L. E. Kay, M. Tyers, and J. D. Forman-Kay (2008)
PNAS 105, 17772-17777
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The RCI server: rapid and accurate calculation of protein flexibility using chemical shifts.
M. V. Berjanskii and D. S. Wishart (2007)
Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W531-W537
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Polyelectrostatic interactions of disordered ligands suggest a physical basis for ultrasensitivity.
M. Borg, T. Mittag, T. Pawson, M. Tyers, J. D. Forman-Kay, and H. S. Chan (2007)
PNAS 104, 9650-9655
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Bidirectional Activity-Dependent Regulation of Neuronal Ion Channel Phosphorylation.
H. Misonou, M. Menegola, D. P. Mohapatra, L. K. Guy, K.-S. Park, and J. S. Trimmer (2006)
J. Neurosci. 26, 13505-13514
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Fli1 and Ets1 Have Distinct Roles in Connective Tissue Growth Factor/CCN2 Gene Regulation and Induction of the Profibrotic Gene Program.
S. S. Nakerakanti, B. Kapanadze, M. Yamasaki, M. Markiewicz, and M. Trojanowska (2006)
J. Biol. Chem. 281, 25259-25269
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Graded regulation of the Kv2.1 potassium channel by variable phosphorylation..
K.-S. Park, D. P. Mohapatra, H. Misonou, and J. S. Trimmer (2006)
Science 313, 976-979
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The Stimulus-induced Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Munc18c Facilitates Vesicle Exocytosis.
E. Oh and D. C. Thurmond (2006)
J. Biol. Chem. 281, 17624-17634
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Phosphorylation by PKA potentiates retinoic acid receptor {alpha} activity by means of increasing interaction with and phosphorylation by cyclin H/cdk7.
E. Gaillard, N. Bruck, Y. Brelivet, G. Bour, S. Lalevee, A. Bauer, O. Poch, D. Moras, and C. Rochette-Egly (2006)
PNAS 103, 9548-9553
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cooperative DNA Binding with AP-1 Proteins Is Required for Transformation by EWS-Ets Fusion Proteins.
S. Kim, C. T. Denny, and R. Wisdom (2006)
Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 2467-2478
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Transcription factor ETS1 is critical for human uterine decidualization.
C. A. Kessler, J. K. Schroeder, A. K. Brar, and S. Handwerger (2006)
Mol. Hum. Reprod. 12, 71-76
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Can You Hear Me Now? Regulating Transcriptional Activators by Phosphorylation.
K. H. Gardner and M. Montminy (2005)
Sci. STKE 2005, pe44
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »

To Advertise     Find Products


Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882