Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Subscribe

Sci. Signal., 3 June 2008
Vol. 1, Issue 22, p. re4
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.122re4]

REVIEWS

Pharmacological PKA Inhibition: All May Not Be What It Seems

Andrew J. Murray*

School of Medical Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.

Abstract: Signaling through the cyclic adenosine monophosphate–dependent protein kinase [protein kinase A (PKA)] is an important and widely studied area of signal transduction research. This signaling pathway is commonly investigated through the use of the pharmacological PKA inhibitors H89 and KT 5720. Both of these compounds are thought to block PKA actions through competitive inhibition of the adenosine triphosphate site on the PKA catalytic subunit. Recently, a number of studies have identified actions of H89 and KT 5720 that are independent of their effects on PKA. These nonspecific effects are widespread; they include actions on other protein kinases and signaling molecules and also on basic cellular functions, such as transcription. Here, I summarize the nonspecific effects of these two compounds and compare their actions with those of other PKA inhibitors.

Overview of cAMP Signaling Back to Top

The transduction of extracellular signals to intracellular responses is one of the most important and complicated aspects of cellular life. The cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling pathway is involved in numerous processes and is widely regarded as the "classical" second messenger signaling pathway. cAMP is synthesized from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) by adenylyl cyclase and is broken down to 5' AMP by a class of proteins known as phosphodiesterases (PDEs) (1, 2). Various stimuli activate adenylyl cyclase, but the best studied is ligand occupation of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)–coupled receptors (GPCRs) coupled to Gs. Agonist occupation of Gs-coupled receptors catalyzes the exchange of guanosine diphosphate (GDP) to guanosine triphosphate (GTP) on the {alpha} subunit of the G protein, causing a conformational change and dissociation of this complex from the β{gamma} subunits. The {alpha} subunit can then interact with and activate adenylyl cyclases (Fig. 1). Receptors coupled to a different G protein, Gi, cause down-regulation of adenylyl cyclase activity and consequent lowering of cAMP concentrations (Fig. 1).  

Figure 1
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1.

Summary of the cAMP signaling cascade. cAMP is produced from ATP by adenylyl cyclase and is broken down by phosphodiesterases to 5' AMP. Adenylyl cyclase activity can be modulated by agonist binding at GPCRs. cAMP acts directly on three targets: PKA, Epac, and CNGCs. These in turn regulate various cellular processes both directly and through intermediaries. For clarity, a number of pathways mediated by PKA, Epac, and Rap1 have been omitted. These pathways are discussed more fully in (1, 6, 8, 9, 63). AKAP, A-kinase anchoring protein; ATF1, activating transcription factor 1; C, protein kinase A catalytic subunit; cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; CNGC, cyclic nucleotide–gated ion channel; CREB, cAMP response element–binding protein; CREM, cAMP response element modulator; ERK1/2, extracellular signal–related kinase 1/2; JNK, Jun N-terminal kinase; PDE, phosphodiesterases; PKA, protein kinase A; R, protein kinase A regulatory subunit

 

cAMP has three direct intracellular targets: protein kinase A (PKA), the exchange protein activated by cAMP (Epac), and cyclic nucleotide–gated ion channels (CNGCs). CNGCs, nonselective cation channels that open upon cyclic nucleotide binding, are particularly important in the olfactory and visual systems (3). Epac is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small G protein Rap1 and has been implicated in a number of cellular processes such as insulin secretion, neurotransmitter release, and integrin-mediated cell adhesion (46). By far the best-studied aspect of cAMP signaling, though, involves cAMP-mediated activation of PKA.

Protein kinase A

PKA was discovered in the laboratory of Edwin G. Krebs in the 1960s (7). Since then it has been implicated in numerous cellular processes, including modulation of other protein kinases, regulation of intracellular calcium concentration, and regulation of transcription [reviewed in (8)]. Transcriptional responses to increased cAMP occur through activation of the cAMP response element–binding protein (CREB), cAMP response element modulator (CREM), and activating transcription factor 1 (ATF1) (9). Each of these transcription factors contains a kinase-inducible domain containing a conserved site for phosphorylation by PKA.

In its inactive state, PKA exists as a tetramer consisting of two regulatory and two catalytic subunits (Fig. 2). Four molecules of cAMP bind to the regulatory subunits to activate PKA, with two cAMP-binding sites, termed the A and B sites, that are present on each regulatory subunit. cAMP binding promotes a conformational change in PKA that initiates the dissociation of the catalytic subunits, leaving a dimer of the two regulatory subunits with four bound cAMP molecules. The two PKA catalytic monomers bind ATP; they then become catalytically active and can phosphorylate serine and threonine residues on proteins containing the appropriate substrate sequence (1) (Fig. 2). PKA signaling can occur in a very small defined domain because of the anchoring of PKA near its targets by A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs), which tether PKA to particular cellular organelles and to the plasma membrane (10). PKA can also activate phosphodiesterases and promote cAMP breakdown in a negative feedback mechanism (2).  

Figure 2
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2.

Activation of PKA by cAMP. In its inactive state, PKA consists of a tetramer of two regulatory and two catalytic subunits. Each regulatory subunit has two cAMP-binding sites; cAMP binding releases the catalytic subunits, which become bound to ATP and go on to phosphorylate serine and threonine residues that possess the appropriate substrate sequence. The two cAMP-binding sites (A and B) on each regulatory subunit are shown. C, protein kinase A catalytic subunit; R, protein kinase A regulatory subunit.

 

Pharmacological Blockade of PKA Back to Top

The study of PKA function has been dominated by the use of pharmacological inhibitors of PKA. Their ease of use and ability to readily cross cell membranes has meant that two compounds in particular have been widely used to study PKA function: N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinoline sulfonamide (H89) and (9R,10S,12S)-2,3,9,10,11,12-hexahydro-10-hydroxy-9-methyl-1-oxo-9,12-epoxy-1H-diindolo[1,2,3-fg:3',2',1'-kl]pyrrolo[3,4-i][1,6]benzodiazocine-10-carboxylic acid, hexyl ester (KT 5720). Separately or in combination, these two compounds have been used in more than 2000 separate studies.

H89 is an isoquinoline derivative that was developed from the nonspecific PKA and protein kinase G (PKG) inhibitor H8 (11); it has been reported to inhibit PKA with an inhibition constant (Ki) of 0.05 µM (12). KT 5720 is one of a family of compounds synthesized from the fungus Nocardiopsis sp.; it is thought to have a Ki of 60 nM for PKA inhibition (13). Both H89 and KT 5720 are thought to act through similar mechanisms (Fig. 3B), namely as competitive antagonists of ATP at its binding site on the PKA catalytic subunit (13, 14). The catalytic subunit must bind ATP before it can phosphorylate appropriate serine or threonine residues on target proteins; therefore, blockade of this site prevents the cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of PKA substrates. Both H89 and KT 5720 are marketed as potent and specific inhibitors of PKA and are widely used as such.  

Figure 3
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3.

Mechanisms of actions of PKA inhibitors. (A) Rp-cAMPS is a competitive antagonist of the cAMP-binding sites on PKA; binding of Rp-cAMPS to PKA prevents the catalytic subunits from being released. PKI peptide, H89, and KT 5720 all act one stage later. After cAMP binding and catalytic subunit release, PKI peptide binds the catalytic subunits and prevents them from phosphorylating targets. (B) H89 and KT 5720 are both competitive antagonists of the ATP sites on the catalytic subunits; without ATP binding, the catalytic subunits are unable to phosphorylate target proteins. C, protein kinase A catalytic subunit; PKI, protein kinase inhibitor peptide; R, protein kinase A regulatory subunit.

 

Competition for ATP binding on protein kinases is a mechanism commonly exploited in developing pharmacological inhibitors. However, this approach presents two distinct and important problems. The IC50 value (the concentration at which a compound inhibits 50% of a given activity) of these compounds varies according to the ATP concentration. Because ATP concentrations vary widely in cells depending on the prevailing physiological conditions, the concentration of inhibitor required for effective protein kinase blockade is not always clear. For example, the IC50 of KT 5720 established at very low ATP concentrations is 56 nM; however, when tested at more physiological ATP concentrations, the IC50 is closer to 3 µM (15). Furthermore, the abundance of ATP and ATP receptors in cells means that PKA inhibitors that interact with ATP-binding sites could be prone to nonspecific actions (16). Indeed, various nonspecific effects of KT 5720 and H89 have been reported.

Non–PKA-Based Actions of KT 5720 Back to Top

KT 5720 actions on other protein kinases

One study of the specificity of a range of protein kinases (15) found that a number of protein kinases were inhibited by KT 5720; some of these were inhibited at substantially lower concentrations than was PKA. For example, KT 5720 inhibited phosphorylase kinase, a molecule activated by calcium that is important in regulation of glycogen homeostasis (17), more potently than it inhibited PKA by a factor of >100 (15). 3-Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase–1 (PDK1), a serine-threonine protein kinase that can activate other kinases, including protein kinase B (PKB), protein kinase C, and serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase (18), was inhibited by KT 5720 with an IC50 of 300 nM, one-tenth the IC50 of KT 5720 for PKA (at identical ATP concentrations). KT 5720 also inhibited MEK [mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase], mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase 1 (MSK1), PKB{alpha}, glycogen synthase kinase 3β, and AMP-activated protein kinase at least as effectively as it inhibited PKA (15). Thus, KT 5720, directly or indirectly, could alter a multitude of signaling pathways and could thereby potentially falsely implicate PKA in a number of cellular processes.

Other studies have also found non–PKA-based effects of KT 5720. A study in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (19) showed that KT 5720 inhibited MAPK with an IC50 of 1.0 µM, whereas it inhibited PKA with an IC50 of 1.4 µM. The effects of MAPK inhibition by KT 5720 were found to alter the cellular cytoskeleton and modify cell shape. PKA signaling has been implicated in cytoskeleton modification, mainly by altering actin and tubulin dynamics (20); this nonspecific effect could thus obscure interactions between PKA and the cytoskeleton. Indeed, the MAPK pathway is involved in many cellular processes that interact with PKA signaling pathways, providing additional opportunities for misinterpretation.

KT 5720 actions on transcription and cellular receptors

One of the major functions of cAMP and PKA is the regulation of transcription through phosphorylation of transcription factors such as CREB (9). One study (21) showed that application of 10 µM KT 5720 completely abolished transcription in CHO cells. Although this finding has been recently contested (22), the possibility remains that this compound could alter gene expression through mechanisms independent of PKA.

The M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor is a GPCR that is expressed widely in the nervous system. Agonist occupation of M1 receptors stimulates phospholipase C activity, releasing calcium from intracellular stores, and can also modulate activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (23). KT 5720 is a potent allosteric modulator of this receptor; at concentrations as low as 10 nM, KT 5720 increases the affinity of acetylcholine for M1 receptors by 40% (24). This suggests that KT 5720 may be inappropriate for studies in the nervous system or in neuronal cells expressing this receptor.

These studies indicate that KT 5720 has numerous actions unrelated to its ability to inhibit PKA. This suggests that other PKA inhibitors should be used in its place. However, the actions of H89 may also not be entirely restricted to PKA.

Non–PKA-Based Actions of H89 Back to Top

H89 actions on other protein kinases and calcium

cAMP and PKA stimulate neurite outgrowth in cultured neurons and neuronal cell lines and also promote the regeneration of damaged axons in vivo (25, 26). One of the main mechanisms whereby cAMP-PKA is thought to promote neurite and axon growth is through inhibition of the small GTPase RhoA, which destabilizes the cytoskeleton through activation of Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) (27). H89 inhibited ROCK in two independent studies. H89 blocked ROCK activity completely when used at 10 µM in a kinase assay, a more potent effect than its inhibition of PKA (15). H89 (again at 10 µM) was also found to block ROCK activation in a neuroblastoma-glioma cell line (28). Application of H89 promoted the formation of neurite-like extensions and also prevented process retraction initiated by RhoA activation. Both of these actions were identical to the actions of a specific ROCK inhibitor and were not mimicked by another PKA inhibitor (28). As PKA itself has been shown to inhibit the actions of ROCK (1), these studies indicate a possible situation whereby both PKA and the PKA inhibitor H89 could have identical effects on this molecule, leading to obvious opportunities for misinterpretation of results.

Other important intracellular signaling molecules are also affected by H89. A study on isolated ventricular myocytes showed that H89 reduced Ca2+ uptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum through a direct action on the Ca2+-ATPase (29), perhaps by lowering this transporter’s affinity for calcium (30). Another study showed that 20 µM H89 prevented increases in cytosolic calcium in response to glucose in pancreatic islets and reduced calcium release from intracellular stores in a differentiated β cell line (INS-1), an effect that was not mimicked by other PKA inhibitors and was thought to be independent of PKA inhibition (31). Recently, H89 has been shown to inhibit insulin-like growth factor–I (IGF-I) activation of the MAPK pathway (32). In a study on myelin basic protein expression in oligodendrocytes, 20 µM H89 prevented extracellular signal–regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK 1/2; part of the MAPK pathway) phosphorylation in response to IGF-I, independently of any actions on PKA (32). The numerous functions of calcium and the MAPK pathway in intracellular signaling processes make these observations particularly important.

In kinase assays (15), 10 µM H89 has been shown to inhibit the activity of several protein kinases by 80 to 100%, including MSK1, protein kinase B, serum- and glucocorticoid-induced kinase, AMP-activated kinase, checkpoint kinase, ribosomal protein s6 kinase (S6K1), and MAPK-activated protein kinase 1. Additionally, three kinases (ROCK-II, MSK1, and S6K1) were inhibited far more potently than PKA itself (15). S6K1 is a downstream target of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and has been implicated in processes as diverse as insulin signaling (33), regulation of cell size (34), and oncogenesis (35). Furthermore, S6K1 can interact with both the regulatory and catalytic subunits of PKA (36) and can directly phosphorylate and activate both CREB (37) and CREM (38); that is, just by inhibiting this one other kinase (S6K1), H89 could substantially obscure studies of PKA signaling. Thus, similarly to KT 5720, H89 can potentially affect a wide variety of signaling molecules.

H89 actions on cellular receptors and channels

The β1- and β2-adrenergic receptors (β1AR and β2AR) are seven-transmembrane receptors that are activated by binding of epinephrine or norepinephrine. These receptors are G protein–coupled and can alter adenylyl cyclase activity and thereby modulate cAMP production (39). They have multiple functions in the body, but are particularly important in the heart (40) and brain (41). A study on human airway cells (42) showed that H89 was a potent antagonist of both β1AR and β2AR, binding with Ki values of just 500 nM for β1AR and 240 nM for β2AR. In accordance with these receptors’ role in modulating cAMP production, preapplication of H89 blocked cAMP accumulation induced by isoproterenol (a β-adrenergic agonist) in these cells. H89 could therefore alter cellular responses to adrenergic receptor binding and influence intracellular concentrations of cAMP. This would interfere with signaling through not only the PKA pathway but also other cAMP effectors such as Epac and CNGCs.

H89 alters conductance in a number of different classes of ion channel. In a study in alveolar type II epithelial cells, H89 was found to potentiate sodium transport by activating amiloride-sensitive sodium channels, an effect similar to that seen with the application of cAMP analogs but opposite to that of other PKA inhibitors (43). In experiments examining potassium currents in rat cardiac myocytes, H89 was found to lower potassium currents through voltage-dependent potassium channels, independently of PKA inhibition (44). In a separate study, H89 decreased currents through Kv1.3 K+ channels expressed in CHO cells with an IC50 value of 1.7 µM (45).

The potency of both H89 and KT 5720 in a variety of cellular signaling molecules, processes, and receptors means that their use can no longer be accepted as evidence for PKA’s involvement in cellular functions. There are, however, a number of other methods that can be used to study PKA signaling in intact cells.

Alternative PKA Inhibitors Back to Top

Rp-cAMPS

Rp-adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate (Rp-cAMPS) is the Rp isomer of the cAMP analog Sp-adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate (Sp-cAMPS) and acts as a competitive antagonist of the cyclic nucleotide–binding domains on PKA (46) (Fig. 3A). Several modifications of Rp-cAMPS have been synthesized that are more resistant to hydrolyzation by phosphodiesterases than is cAMP, and they are also membrane-permeable. The mechanisms of action and structure (closely related to cAMP) of the Rp-cAMPS family of compounds suggest that they are unlikely to have substantial effects outside of the cAMP signaling cascade. However, as Rp-cAMPS is a competitive inhibitor of the cAMP-binding site, its effects are diminished when endogenous levels of cAMP are extremely high, and in this situation cAMP may still be able to bind to and activate PKA. Additionally, although often considered selective inhibitors of PKA, these compounds should be used cautiously in studies of PKA function, as a number of other molecules contain cyclic nucleotide–binding sites similar in structure to those found on PKA. For example, whether Rp-cAMPS acts on the cAMP-binding site of Epac is controversial; although it has been shown that Rp-cAMPS has a high affinity for PKA, it is also known to bind to Epac (47, 48). Cyclic nucleotide–gated ion channels contain similar domains, and it is conceivable that Rp-cAMPS could also interfere with their function, although this has not yet been reported.

Protein kinase inhibitor peptide

Protein kinase inhibitor peptide (PKI) is an endogenous molecule that participates in the regulation of PKA activity. PKI binds to the free catalytic subunit of PKA and prevents phosphorylation of PKA targets, in a manner similar to how the catalytic subunits are "housed" by the regulatory subunits of PKA in the absence of cAMP (Fig. 3B). Three distinct PKI isoforms have been identified ({alpha}, β, and {gamma}), and each is expressed in various tissues and cell types (49). Synthetic forms of PKI have been developed, such as PKI-(6-22)-amide and PKI-(Myr-14-22)-amide, and these have been used to examine the role of PKA in various cell processes (49). As a result of its mechanisms of action, PKI is likely to be a more specific inhibitor of PKA than is either H89 or KT 5720; indeed, endogenous PKI is thought to be completely specific for PKA. However, higher concentrations of the synthetic PKIs affect PKG signaling (50), and so these compounds still need to be used with caution.

Molecular techniques

RNA interference (RNAi) has revolutionized the study of signal transduction molecules and led to the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for its discoverers (51). Briefly, the process involves the production of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), sequences 20 to 25 nucleotides in length that bind to specific mRNA molecules and prevent protein synthesis. This has the effect of "knocking down" levels of particular proteins. Commercially available siRNAs are readily accessible and can be introduced into intact cells through various transfection techniques. Inhibition of PKA activity can be achieved with knockdown of the catalytic subunits of PKA. Three different isoforms of the catalytic subunit have been identified ({alpha}, β, and {gamma}); {alpha} and β are expressed in various cell types, whereas {gamma} is thought to be expressed only in the testis (52). Therefore, for effective inhibition, at least two isoforms ({alpha} and β) of this subunit need to be targeted with siRNA (5355). Furthermore, the recent coupling of RNAi technology with adeno-associated viral vectors allows for the study of PKA signaling in vivo in both a spatially restricted and cell type–restricted manner (56). Although some off-target effects of RNAi have been reported (57), these molecules still represent a far more specific approach than H89 and KT 5720.

Introduction of a nonfunctioning PKA mutant, such as a dominant negative version of PKA, into cells allows researchers to specifically perturb signaling through PKA with a far-decreased likelihood of nonspecific effects. Dominant negative forms of PKA have been used to examine PKA’s role in cell anchorage (58), protein expression in epithelial cells (59), and differentiation of tumor cells (60). PKA signaling can also be perturbed by transfection of cDNA that prevents binding of the regulatory subunits to AKAPs and therefore prevents the localization of PKA to specific cellular organelles. This strategy has been used, for example, in the study of PKA signaling in neuronal receptor expression (61). The major drawback of these strategies is the difficulty of transfecting constructs into cells in vitro or in vivo with high efficiency. This is especially problematic with postmitotic cells such as neurons. However, transfection technology is improving constantly, and a number of different methods now exist, such as viral vectors and numerous commercially available lipofection reagents. The extremely high specificity of these techniques relative to pharmacological agents makes it likely that molecular techniques will continue to set the standard in signal transduction research.

Future Strategies for PKA Inhibition Back to Top

The above outlined studies indicate that neither KT 5720 nor H89 should be used alone to study the function of PKA. As these compounds are so commonly used, it will therefore be necessary to devise strategies that can overcome their shortcomings. One possibility is to use H89 or KT 5720 along with Rp-cAMPS, PKI, or both. If these distinct sets of inhibitors give similar results, the investigator can be more confident of PKA involvement. (Additionally, the use of H89 and KT 5720 could be accompanied by tests of inhibitors of other kinases to assess whether any of the observed effects could have been through inhibition of other signaling molecules.) PKA inhibitors could also be used along with specific activators of PKA. Recently, a number of cAMP analogs that can specifically activate PKA (rather than other cAMP targets) have become available (62). Demonstration that these activators have effects opposite to those of inhibitors such as Rp-cAMPS would enable the experimenter to have more confidence that PKA mediated the functions under investigation. Finally, and perhaps most preferentially, pharmacological inhibitors of PKA could be used in combination with one or more genetic methods for blocking PKA signaling. Mimicking the effect of H89 or KT 5720 with siRNA or dominant negative PKA would provide the most reliable indication of PKA function.

This combinatorial approach to PKA inhibition should provide a new benchmark for analysis of PKA function and hopefully will lead to a more discriminate use of ATP site–directed inhibitors.

Summary Back to Top

The PKA inhibitors H89 and KT 5720 have been widely used in the study of signal transduction and have provided invaluable insights into the function of PKA in various cell types. However, a substantial body of evidence has now accumulated that indicates that both H89 and KT 5720 can have effects independent of PKA inhibition. These actions are extremely varied; some of the most worrisome actions are the substantial effects on the MAPK and calcium signaling pathways, which interact with the PKA pathway and mediate multiple cellular functions. Furthermore, many of these non–PKA-based actions of H89 and KT 5720 occur at concentrations that have been widely used to investigate PKA function. Despite these nonspecific actions, both of these compounds are still widely used; PubMed searches reveal that in the past 2 years alone, they have been used in more than 200 studies. The identification of a distinct target for cAMP (Epac) has complicated the cAMP signaling cascade. Many of the pathways involved in Epac and PKA signaling are related, and some cellular processes that have been previously attributed to PKA may actually involve Epac. Therefore, the use of H89 and KT 5720 could give false indications of PKA function by acting both within and without the cAMP signaling cascade. A number of other methods exist, both pharmacological and molecular, for studying the function of PKA, and many of these are more specific. Furthermore, the molecular bases of some cellular processes attributed to PKA solely through the use of these compounds may have to be reevaluated. Thus, although H89 and KT 5720 have been extremely useful in examining the roles of PKA in cell signaling, it may now be time for them to be superseded by other methods.


*Corresponding author. E-mail, a.j.murray{at}abdn.ac.uk Back

References Back to Top

  1. G. Fimia, P. Sassone-Corsi, cAMP signalling. J. Cell Sci. 114, 1971–1972 (2001).[Free Full Text]
  2. R. K. Sunahara, C. W. Dessauer, A. G. Gilman, Complexity and diversity of mammalian adenylyl cyclases. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 36, 461–480 (1996).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  3. K. B. Craven, W. N. Zagotta, CNG and HCN channels: Two peas, one pod. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 68, 375–401 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  4. J. de Rooij, F. J. Zwartkruis, M. H. Verheijen, R. H. Cool, S. M. Nijman, A. Wittinghofer, J. L. Bos, Epac is a Rap1 guanine-nucleotide-exchange factor directly activated by cyclic AMP. Nature 396, 474–477 (1998).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  5. H. Kawasaki, G. M. Springett, N. Mochizuki, S. Toki, M. Nakaya, M. Matsuda, D. E. Housman, A. M. Graybiel, A family of cAMP-binding proteins that directly activate Rap1. Science 282, 2275–2279 (1998).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. J. L. Bos, Epac proteins: Multi-purpose cAMP targets. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 680–686 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  7. D. A. Walsh, J. P. Perkins, E. G. Krebs, An adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate-dependent protein kinase from rabbit skeletal muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 243, 3763–3765 (1968).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. K. Taskén, E. M. Aandahl, Localized effects of cAMP mediated by distinct routes of protein kinase A. Physiol. Rev. 84, 137–167 (2004).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. W. A. Sands, T. M. Palmer, Regulating gene transcription in response to cAMP elevation. Cell. Signal. 20, 460–466 (2008).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  10. D. L. Beene, J. D. Scott, A-kinase anchoring proteins take shape. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 192–198 (2007).[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. H. Hidaka, M. Inagaki, S. Kawamoto, Y. Sasaki, Isoquinolinesulfonamides, novel and potent inhibitors of cyclic nucleotide dependent protein kinase and protein kinase C. Biochemistry 23, 5036–5041 (1984).[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. T. Chijiwa, A. Mishima, M. Hagiwara, M. Sano, K. Hayashi, T. Inoue, K. Naito, T. Toshioka, H. Hidaka, Inhibition of forskolin-induced neurite outgrowth and protein phosphorylation by a newly synthesized selective inhibitor of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase, N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide (H-89), of PC12D pheochromocytoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 5267–5272 (1990).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. H. Kase, K. Iwahashi, S. Nakanishi, Y. Matsuda, K. Yamada, M. Takahashi, C. Murakata, A. Sato, M. Kaneko, K-252 compounds, novel and potent inhibitors of protein kinase C and cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 142, 436–440 (1987).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  14. R. A. Engh, A. Girod, V. Kinzel, R. Huber, D. Bossemeyer, Crystal structures of catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase in complex with isoquinolinesulfonyl protein kinase inhibitors H7, H8, and H89. Structural implications for selectivity. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26157–26164 (1996).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. S. P. Davies, H. Reddy, M. Caivano, P. Cohen, Specificity and mechanism of action of some commonly used protein kinase inhibitors. Biochem. J. 351, 95–105 (2000).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  16. A. Lochner, J. A. Moolman, The many faces of H89: A review. Cardiovasc. Drug Rev. 24, 261–274 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  17. R. J. Brushia, D. A. Walsh, Phosphorylase kinase: The complexity of its regulation is reflected in the complexity of its structure. Front. Biosci. 4, D618–D641 (1999).[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. M. Tessier, J. R. Woodgett, Serum and glucocorticoid-regulated protein kinases: Variations on a theme. J. Cell. Biochem. 98, 1391–1407 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  19. M. K. Olsen, A. A. Reszka, I. Abraham, KT5720 and U-98017 inhibit MAPK and alter the cytoskeleton and cell morphology. J. Cell. Physiol. 176, 525–536 (1998).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  20. A. K. Howe, Regulation of actin-based cell migration by cAMP/PKA. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1692, 159–174 (2004).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  21. S. M. Keezer, D. M. Gilbert, Sensitivity of the origin decision point to specific inhibitors of cellular signaling and metabolism. Exp. Cell Res. 273, 54–64 (2002).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  22. D. S. Dimitrova, Nuclear transcription is essential for specification of mammalian replication origins. Genes Cells 11, 829–844 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  23. W. Tsai, A. D. Morielli, E. G. Peralta, The m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor transactivates the EGF receptor to modulate ion channel activity. EMBO J. 16, 4597–4605 (1997).[Abstract]
  24. S. Lazareno, A. Popham, N. J. Birdsall, Allosteric interactions of staurosporine and other indolocarbazoles with N-[methyl-(3)H]scopolamine and acetylcholine at muscarinic receptor subtypes: Identification of a second allosteric site. Mol. Pharmacol. 58, 194–207 (2000).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. R. E. Rydel, L. A. Greene, cAMP analogs promote survival and neurite outgrowth in cultures of rat sympathetic and sensory neurons independently of nerve growth factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 1257–1261 (1988).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. J. Qiu, D. Cai, H. Dai, M. McAtee, P. N. Hoffman, B. S. Bregman, M. T. Filbin, Spinal axon regeneration induced by elevation of cyclic AMP. Neuron 34, 895–903 (2002).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  27. A. Sandvig, M. Berry, L. B. Barrett, A. Butt, A. Logan, Myelin-, reactive glia-, and scar-derived CNS axon growth inhibitors: Expression, receptor signaling, and correlation with axon regeneration. Glia 46, 225–251 (2004).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  28. J. Leemhuis, S. Boutillier, G. Schmidt, D. K. Meyer, The protein kinase A inhibitor H89 acts on cell morphology by inhibiting Rho kinase. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 300, 1000–1007 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. M. Hussain, G. A. Drago, M. Bhogal, J. Colyer, C. H. Orchard, Effects of the protein kinase A inhibitor H-89 on Ca2+ regulation in isolated ferret ventricular myocytes. Pflugers Arch. 437, 529–537 (1999).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  30. P. Lahouratate, J. Guibert, J. C. Camelin, I. Bertrand, Specific inhibition of cardiac and skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ pumps by H-89. Biochem. Pharmacol. 54, 991–998 (1997).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  31. H. P. Bode, B. Moormann, R. Dabew, B. Goke, Glucagon-like peptide 1 elevates cytosolic calcium in pancreatic β-cells independently of protein kinase A. Endocrinology 140, 3919–3927 (1999).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  32. N. Palacios, F. Sanchez-Franco, M. Fernandez, I. Sanchez, G. Villuendas, L. Cacicedo, Opposite effects of two PKA inhibitors on cAMP inhibition of IGF-I-induced oligodendrocyte development: A problem of unspecificity? Brain Res. 1178, 1–11 (2007).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  33. S. H. Um, D. D’Alessio, G. Thomas, Nutrient overload, insulin resistance, and ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1, S6K1. Cell Metab. 3, 393–402 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  34. I. Ruvinsky, O. Meyuhas, Ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation: From protein synthesis to cell size. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 342–348 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Y. Mamane, E. Petroulakis, O. LeBacquer, N. Sonenberg, mTOR, translation initiation and cancer. Oncogene 25, 6416–6422 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  36. M. D. Houslay, A RSK(y) relationship with promiscuous PKA. Sci. STKE 2006, pe32 (2006).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. S. W. Kim, J. S. Hong, S. H. Ryu, W. C. Chung, J. H. Yoon, J. S. Koo, Regulation of mucin gene expression by CREB via a nonclassical retinoic acid signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 6933–6947 (2007).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. R. P. de Groot, L. M. Ballou, P. Sassone-Corsi, Positive regulation of the nuclear activator CREM by the mitogen-induced p70 S6 kinase. Immunobiology 193, 155–160 (1995). [Web of Science][Medline]
  39. R.-P. Xiao, β-adrenergic signaling in the heart: Dual coupling of the β2-adrenergic receptor to Gs and Gi proteins. Sci. STKE 2001, re15 (2001).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. J. J. Saucerman, A. D. McCulloch, Cardiac β-adrenergic signaling: From subcellular microdomains to heart failure. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1080, 348–361 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  41. J. L. McGaugh, Make mild moments memorable: Add a little arousal. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 345–347 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  42. R. B. Penn, J. L. Parent, A. N. Pronin, R. A. Paneettieri, Jr., J. L. Benovic, Pharmacological inhibition of protein kinases in intact cells: Antagonism of β adrenergic receptor ligand binding by H-89 reveals limitations of usefulness. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 288, 428–437 (1999).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. N. Niisato, Y. Ito, Y. Marunaka, Effects of PKA inhibitors, H-compounds, on epithelial Na+ channels via PKA-independent mechanisms. Life Sci. 65, PL109–PL114 (1999).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  44. C. Pearman, W. Kent, N. Bracken, M. Hussain, H-89 inhibits transient outward and inward rectifier potassium currents in isolated rat ventricular myocytes. Br. J. Pharmacol. 148, 1091–1098 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  45. J. Choi, B. H. Choi, S. J. Hahn, S. H. Yoon, D. S. Min, Y. Jo, M. Kim, Inhibition of Kv1.3 channels by H-89 (N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide) independent of protein kinase A. Biochem. Pharmacol. 61, 1029–1032 (2001).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  46. R. J. de Wit, D. Hekstra, B. Jastorff, W. J. Stec, J. Baraniak, R. Van Driel, P. J. Van Haastert, Inhibitory action of certain cyclophosphate derivatives of cAMP on cAMP-dependent protein kinases. Eur. J. Biochem. 142, 255–260 (1984). [Web of Science][Medline]
  47. H. Rehmann, F. Schwede, S. O. Doskeland, A. Wittinghofer, J. L. Bos, Ligand-mediated activation of the cAMP-responsive guanine nucleotide exchange factor Epac. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 38548–38556 (2003).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. A. E. Christensen, F. Selheim, J. de Rooij, S. Dremier, F. Schwede, K. K. Dao, A. Martinez, C. Maenhaut, J. L. Bos, H. G. Genieser, S. O. Doskeland, cAMP analog mapping of Epac1 and cAMP kinase. Discriminating analogs demonstrate that Epac and cAMP kinase act synergistically to promote PC-12 cell neurite extension. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 35394–35402 (2003).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. G. D. Dalton, W. L. Dewey, Protein kinase inhibitor peptide (PKI): A family of endogenous neuropeptides that modulate neuronal cAMP-dependent protein kinase function. Neuropeptides 40, 23–34 (2006).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  50. D. B. Glass, M. J. Feller, L. R. Levin, D. R. Walsh, Structural basis for the low affinities of yeast cAMP-dependent and mammalian cGMP-dependent protein kinases for protein kinase inhibitor peptides. Biochemistry 31, 1728–1734 (1992).[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. A. Fire, S. Xu, M. K. Montgomery, S. A. Kostas, S. E. Driver, C. C. Mello, Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806–811 (1998).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  52. B. S. Skålhegg, K. Tasken, Specificity in the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. Differential expression, regulation and subcellular localisation of subunits of PKA. Front. Biosci. 5, d678–d693 (2000).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  53. N. Dumaz, R. Marais, Protein kinase A blocks Raf-1 activity by stimulating 14-3-3 binding and blocking Raf-1 interaction with Ras. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 29819–29823 (2003).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. J. A. Rudolph, J. Pratt, R. Mourya, K. A. Steinbrecher, M. B. Cohen, Novel mechanism of cyclic AMP mediated extracellular signal regulated kinase activation in an intestinal cell line. Cell. Signal. 19, 1221–1228 (2007).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  55. T. K. Monaghan, C. J. MacKenzie, R. Plevin, E. M. Lutz, PACAP-38 induces neuronal differentiation of human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells via cAMP-mediated activation of ERK and p38 MAP kinases. J. Neurochem. 104, 74–88 (2008). [Web of Science][Medline]
  56. J. D. Hommel, R. M. Sears, D. Georgescu, D. L. Simmons, R. J. DiLeone, Local gene knockdown in the brain using viral mediated RNA-interference. Nat. Med. 9, 1539–1544 (2003).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  57. A. L. Jackson, P. S. Linsley, Noise amidst the silence: Off-target effects of siRNAs? Trends Genet. 20, 521–524 (2004).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  58. A. K. Howe, R. L. Juliano, Regulation of anchorage dependent signal transduction by protein kinase A and p21-activated kinase. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 593–600 (2000).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  59. K. Hayashida, D. R. Johnston, O. Goldberger, P. W. Park, Syndecan-1 expression in epithelial cells is induced by transforming growth factor β through a PKA-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 24365–24374 (2006).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. M. E. Cox, P. D. Deeble, E. A. Bissonette, S. J. Parsons, Activated 3',5'-cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase is sufficient to induce neuroendocrine-like differentiation of the LNCaP prostate tumor cell line. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 13812–13818 (2000).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. E. M. Snyder, M. Colledge, R. A. Crozier, W. S. Chen, J. D. Scott, M. F. Bear, Role for A kinase-anchoring proteins (AKAPS) in glutamate receptor trafficking and long term synaptic depression. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 16962–16968 (2005).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. H. Poppe, S. D. Rybalkin, H. Rehmann, T. R. Hinds, X. B. Tang, A. E. Christensen, F. Schwede, H. G. Genieser, J. L. Bos, S. O. Doskeland, J. A. Beavo, E. Butt, Cyclic nucleotide analogs as probes of signaling pathways. Nat. Methods 5, 277–278 (2008).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]
  63. J. L. Bos, J. de Rooij, K. A. Reedquist, Rap1 signaling: Adhering to new models. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 369–377 (2001).[CrossRef] [Web of Science][Medline]

Citation: A. J. Murray, Pharmacological PKA Inhibition: All May Not Be What It Seems. Sci. Signal. 1, re4 (2008).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Cholera toxin enhances Na+ absorption across MCF10A human mammary epithelia.
Q. Wang and B. D. Schultz (2014)
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 306, C471-C484
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Exchange protein activated by cAMP (Epac) induces vascular relaxation by activating Ca2+-sensitive K+ channels in rat mesenteric artery.
O. L. Roberts, T. Kamishima, R. Barrett-Jolley, J. M. Quayle, and C. Dart (2013)
J. Physiol. 591, 5107-5123
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Small-Molecule Screening Identifies Modulators of Aquaporin-2 Trafficking.
J. Bogum, D. Faust, K. Zuhlke, J. Eichhorst, M. C. Moutty, J. Furkert, A. Eldahshan, M. Neuenschwander, J. P. von Kries, B. Wiesner, et al. (2013)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 24, 744-758
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
RAB13 regulates Sertoli cell permeability barrier dynamics through protein kinase A.
W. Su and X. Liu (2013)
J. Mol. Endocrinol. 50, 305-318
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cardiomyocyte Life-Death Decisions in Response to Chronic {beta}-Adrenergic Signaling.
R. S. Whelan, K. Konstantinidis, R.-P. Xiao, and R. N. Kitsis (2013)
Circ. Res. 112, 408-410
   Full Text »    PDF »
Isoform-specific antagonists of exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP.
T. Tsalkova, F. C. Mei, S. Li, O. G. Chepurny, C. A. Leech, T. Liu, G. G. Holz, V. L. Woods Jr., and X. Cheng (2012)
PNAS 109, 18613-18618
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Protein kinase A modulates the activity of a major human isoform of ABCG1.
I. C. Gelissen, L. J. Sharpe, C. Sandoval, G. Rao, M. Kockx, L. Kritharides, W. Jessup, and A. J. Brown (2012)
J. Lipid Res. 53, 2133-2140
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Adaptive Regulation Maintains Posttetanic Potentiation at Cerebellar Granule Cell Synapses in the Absence of Calcium-Dependent PKC.
D. Fioravante, M. H. Myoga, M. Leitges, and W. G. Regehr (2012)
J. Neurosci. 32, 13004-13009
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Acidosis Promotes Bcl-2 Family-mediated Evasion of Apoptosis: INVOLVEMENT OF ACID-SENSING G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR GPR65 SIGNALING TO MEK/ERK.
C. Ryder, K. McColl, F. Zhong, and C. W. Distelhorst (2012)
J. Biol. Chem. 287, 27863-27875
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exotoxin Y Is a Promiscuous Cyclase That Increases Endothelial Tau Phosphorylation and Permeability.
C. D. Ochoa, M. Alexeyev, V. Pastukh, R. Balczon, and T. Stevens (2012)
J. Biol. Chem. 287, 25407-25418
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Role of Deleted in Breast Cancer 1 (DBC1) Protein in SIRT1 Deacetylase Activation Induced by Protein Kinase A and AMP-activated Protein Kinase.
V. Nin, C. Escande, C. C. Chini, S. Giri, J. Camacho-Pereira, J. Matalonga, Z. Lou, and E. N. Chini (2012)
J. Biol. Chem. 287, 23489-23501
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Functional coupling of the metabotropic glutamate receptor, InsP3 receptor and L-type Ca2+ channel in mouse CA1 pyramidal cells.
H. K. Kato, H. Kassai, A. M. Watabe, A. Aiba, and T. Manabe (2012)
J. Physiol. 590, 3019-3034
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cell Contact-dependent Functional Selectivity of {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Ligands in Stimulating cAMP Accumulation and Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase Phosphorylation.
A. I. Kaya, H. O. Onaran, G. Ozcan, C. Ambrosio, T. Costa, S. Balli, and O. Ugur (2012)
J. Biol. Chem. 287, 6362-6374
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Therapeutic Implications for Striatal-Enriched Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase (STEP) in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.
S. M. Goebel-Goody, M. Baum, C. D. Paspalas, S. M. Fernandez, N. C. Carty, P. Kurup, and P. J. Lombroso (2012)
Pharmacol. Rev. 64, 65-87
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Type I Keratin 17 Protein Is Phosphorylated on Serine 44 by p90 Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinase 1 (RSK1) in a Growth- and Stress-dependent Fashion.
X. Pan, L. A. Kane, J. E. Van Eyk, and P. A. Coulombe (2011)
J. Biol. Chem. 286, 42403-42413
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Enhances GABA Transport by Modulating the Trafficking of GABA Transporter-1 (GAT-1) from the Plasma Membrane of Rat Cortical Astrocytes.
S. H. Vaz, T. N. Jorgensen, S. Cristovao-Ferreira, S. Duflot, J. A. Ribeiro, U. Gether, and A. M. Sebastiao (2011)
J. Biol. Chem. 286, 40464-40476
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Protein kinase A acts at the basal body of the primary cilium to prevent Gli2 activation and ventralization of the mouse neural tube.
M. Tuson, M. He, and K. V. Anderson (2011)
Development 138, 4921-4930
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Testosterone suppresses phospholipase D, causing sex differences in leukotriene biosynthesis in human monocytes.
C. Pergola, A. Rogge, G. Dodt, H. Northoff, C. Weinigel, D. Barz, O. Radmark, L. Sautebin, and O. Werz (2011)
FASEB J 25, 3377-3387
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
PKA phosphorylation couples hepatic inositol-requiring enzyme 1{alpha} to glucagon signaling in glucose metabolism.
T. Mao, M. Shao, Y. Qiu, J. Huang, Y. Zhang, B. Song, Q. Wang, L. Jiang, Y. Liu, J.-D. J. Han, et al. (2011)
PNAS 108, 15852-15857
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The Prostaglandin E2 Receptor, EP2, Stimulates Keratinocyte Proliferation in Mouse Skin by G Protein-dependent and {beta}-Arrestin1-dependent Signaling Pathways.
K.-S. Chun, H.-C. Lao, and R. Langenbach (2010)
J. Biol. Chem. 285, 39672-39681
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
14-3-3 Proteins Regulate Protein Kinase A Activity to Modulate Growth Cone Turning Responses.
C. B. Kent, T. Shimada, G. B. Ferraro, B. Ritter, P. T. Yam, P. S. McPherson, F. Charron, T. E. Kennedy, and A. E. Fournier (2010)
J. Neurosci. 30, 14059-14067
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Activation of Adenosine A2A Receptors Induces TrkB Translocation and Increases BDNF-Mediated Phospho-TrkB Localization in Lipid Rafts: Implications for Neuromodulation.
N. Assaife-Lopes, V. C. Sousa, D. B. Pereira, J. A. Ribeiro, M. V. Chao, and A. M. Sebastiao (2010)
J. Neurosci. 30, 8468-8480
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Rap1 Promotes Multiple Pancreatic Islet Cell Functions and Signals through Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 to Enhance Proliferation.
P. Kelly, C. L. Bailey, P. T. Fueger, C. B. Newgard, P. J. Casey, and M. E. Kimple (2010)
J. Biol. Chem. 285, 15777-15785
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Prostaglandin I2-IP Signaling Promotes Th1 Differentiation in a Mouse Model of Contact Hypersensitivity.
S. Nakajima, T. Honda, D. Sakata, G. Egawa, H. Tanizaki, A. Otsuka, C. S. Moniaga, T. Watanabe, Y. Miyachi, S. Narumiya, et al. (2010)
J. Immunol. 184, 5595-5603
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Bovine herpesvirus-1 US3 protein kinase: critical residues and involvement in the phosphorylation of VP22.
S. L. Labiuk, V. Lobanov, Z. Lawman, M. Snider, L. A. Babiuk, and S. van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk (2010)
J. Gen. Virol. 91, 1117-1126
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
PDE4 inhibition drives resolution of neutrophilic inflammation by inducing apoptosis in a PKA-PI3K/Akt-dependent and NF-{kappa}B-independent manner.
L. P. Sousa, F. Lopes, D. M. Silva, L. P. Tavares, A. T. Vieira, B. M. Rezende, A. F. Carmo, R. C. Russo, C. C. Garcia, C. A. Bonjardim, et al. (2010)
J. Leukoc. Biol. 87, 895-904
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Phosphorylation Regulates Removal of Synaptic N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors after Withdrawal from Chronic Ethanol Exposure.
P. Clapp, E. S. Gibson, M. L. Dell'Acqua, and P. L. Hoffman (2010)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 332, 720-729
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell calcification by extracellular pyrophosphate homeostasis: synergistic modulation by cyclic AMP and hyperphosphatemia.
D. A. Prosdocimo, S. C. Wyler, A. M. Romani, W. C. O'Neill, and G. R. Dubyak (2010)
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 298, C702-C713
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
cAMP-Dependent Axon Guidance Is Distinctly Regulated by Epac and Protein Kinase A.
A. J. Murray, S. J. Tucker, and D. A. Shewan (2009)
J. Neurosci. 29, 15434-15444
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
IFN{gamma} regulates retinal pigment epithelial fluid transport.
R. Li, A. Maminishkis, T. Banzon, Q. Wan, S. Jalickee, S. Chen, and S. S. Miller (2009)
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 297, C1452-C1465
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Protein Kinase A Activity Controls the Regulation of T-type CaV3.2 Channels by G{beta}{gamma} Dimers.
C. Hu, S. D. DePuy, J. Yao, W. E. McIntire, and P. Q. Barrett (2009)
J. Biol. Chem. 284, 7465-7473
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »

To Advertise     Find Products


Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882