Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Sci. Signal., 21 May 2013
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2003350]

Supplementary Materials for:

Cross-Species Protein Interactome Mapping Reveals Species-Specific Wiring of Stress Response Pathways

Jishnu Das, Tommy V. Vo, Xiaomu Wei, Joseph C. Mellor, Virginia Tong, Andrew G. Degatano, Xiujuan Wang, Lihua Wang, Nicolas A. Cordero, Nathan Kruer-Zerhusen, Akihisa Matsuyama, Jeffrey A. Pleiss, Steven M. Lipkin, Minoru Yoshida, Frederick P. Roth, Haiyuan Yu*

*Corresponding author. E-mail: haiyuan.yu{at}cornell.edu

This PDF file includes:

  • Fig. S1. Detection of PRS interactions and RRS pairs by three orthogonal assays.
  • Fig. S2. Confirmation of the reliability of weights of the interactions.
  • Fig. S3. Evolutionary rate of essential and nonessential genes using S. cryophilus or S. octosporus for comparison.
  • Fig. S4. Evolutionary rate of stress response genes and all genes comparing S. cryophilus or S. octosporus to S. pombe.
  • Fig. S5. Measurement of evolutionary divergence of S. pombe from S. cryophilus and S. octosporus.
  • Fig. S6. Conservation as a function of sequence identity of the entire protein or sequence identity of the interacting domains.
  • Fig. S7. Graphical representation of global and local coexpression of genes that express interacting proteins.
  • Fig. S8. Functional analysis of conserved and rewired (by definition) interactions in S. cerevisiae.
  • Fig. S9. Fractions of globally and locally coexpressed pairs for interacting proteins with interactions of different confidence levels.
  • Fig. S10. Fractions of functionally similar pairs for interacting proteins with interactions of different confidence levels.
  • Fig. S11. Interactions in the fission and budding yeast MAPK pathways.
  • Fig. S12. Sensitivity assays for deletion strains of S. pombe KGY553 (ATCC) under various stress conditions (n = 3 experiments).
  • Table S1. Interactome sizes.
  • Table S8. Primers used.
  • Legends for tables S2 to S7

[Download PDF]

Technical Details

Format: Adobe Acrobat PDF

Size: 6.85 MB

Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following:

  • Table S2 (Microsoft Excel format). S. pombe ORFs screened.
  • Table S3 (Microsoft Excel format). StressNet and interaction confidence scores.
  • Table S4 (Microsoft Excel format). Positive reference set.
  • Table S5 (Microsoft Excel format). Random reference set.
  • Table S6 (Microsoft Excel format). StressNet genes and number of interactions.
  • Table S7 (Microsoft Excel format). StressNet—Conservation and rewiring.

[Download Tables S2 to S7]


Citation: J. Das, T. V. Vo, X. Wei, J. C. Mellor, V. Tong, A. G. Degatano, X. Wang, L. Wang, N. A. Cordero, N. Kruer-Zerhusen, A. Matsuyama, J. A. Pleiss, S. M. Lipkin, M. Yoshida, F. P. Roth, H. Yu, Cross-Species Protein Interactome Mapping Reveals Species-Specific Wiring of Stress Response Pathways. Sci. Signal. 6, ra38 (2013).

© 2013 American Association for the Advancement of Science


To Advertise     Find Products


Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882