Related Content
Search Google Scholar for:
|
Science 291 (5507): 1284-1289
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science
Human DNA Repair Genes
Richard D. Wood,1*
Michael Mitchell,2
John Sgouros,2
Tomas Lindahl1
Cellular DNA is subjected to continual attack, both by reactive
species inside cells and by environmental agents. Toxic and mutagenic
consequences are minimized by distinct pathways of repair, and 130 known human DNA repair genes are described here. Notable features
presently include four enzymes that can remove uracil from DNA, seven
recombination genes related to RAD51, and many recently discovered DNA
polymerases that bypass damage, but only one system to remove the main
DNA lesions induced by ultraviolet light. More human DNA repair genes
will be found by comparison with model organisms and as common folds in
three-dimensional protein structures are determined. Modulation of DNA
repair should lead to clinical applications including improvement of
radiotherapy and treatment with anticancer drugs and an advanced
understanding of the cellular aging process.
1 Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Clare Hall
Laboratories, Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Herts EN6 3LD, UK.
2 Imperial Cancer Research Fund, 44 Lincoln's Inn
Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK.
*
Present address: University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, S867
Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
The human genome, like other
genomes, encodes information to protect its own integrity
(1). DNA repair enzymes continuously monitor chromosomes to
correct damaged nucleotide residues generated by exposure to
carcinogens and cytotoxic compounds. The damage is partly a consequence
of environmental agents such as ultraviolet (UV) light from the sun,
inhaled cigarette smoke, or incompletely defined dietary factors.
However, a large proportion of DNA alterations are caused unavoidably
by endogenous weak mutagens including water, reactive oxygen species,
and metabolites that can act as alkylating agents. Very slow turnover
of DNA consequently occurs even in cells that do not proliferate.
Genome instability caused by the great variety of DNA-damaging agents
would be an overwhelming problem for cells and organisms if it were not
for DNA repair.
On the basis of searches of the current draft of the human genome
sequence (2), we compiled a comprehensive list of DNA repair
genes (Table 1). This inventory
focuses on genes whose products have been functionally linked to the
recognition and repair of damaged DNA as well as those showing strong
sequence homology to repair genes in other organisms. Readers
desiring further information on specific genes should consult the
primary references and links available through the accession
numbers. Recent review articles on the evolutionary relationships of
DNA repair genes (3) and common sequence motifs in DNA
repair genes (4) may also be helpful.
Table 1.
Human DNA repair genes. A version of this table with
active links to Gene Cards (bioinformatics.weizmann.ac.il/cards) and to
the National Center for Biotechnology Information is available
(24) on Science Online. A version with updates is
available at www.cgal.icnet.uk/DNA_Repair_Genes.html. XP, xeroderma
pigmentosum.
|
| Gene name
(synonyms) |
Activity |
Chromosome location |
Accession number |
|
| Base
excision repair (BER) |
|
DNA glycosylases:
major altered base
released |
| UNG |
U |
12q23-q24.1 |
NM_003362 |
| SMUG1 |
U |
12q13.1-q14 |
NM_014311 |
| MBD4 |
U
or T opposite G at CpG sequences |
3q21-q22 |
NM_003925 |
| TDG |
U,
T or ethenoC opposite G |
12q24.1 |
NM_003211 |
| OGG1 |
8-oxoG
opposite C |
3p26.2 |
NM_002542 |
| MYH |
A opposite
8-oxoG |
1p34.3-p32.1 |
NM_012222 |
| NTH1 |
Ring-saturated or
fragmented pyrimidines |
16p13.3-p13.2 |
NM_002528 |
| MPG |
3-meA,
ethenoA,
hypoxanthine |
16p13.3 |
NM_002434 |
|
Other BER
factors |
| APE1 (HAP1, APEX, REF1) |
AP
endonuclease |
14q12 |
NM_001641 |
| APE2 (APEXL2) |
AP
endonuclease |
X |
NM_014481 |
| LIG3 |
Main ligation
function |
17q11.2-q12 |
NM_013975 |
| XRCC1 |
Main ligation
function |
19q13.2 |
NM_006297 |
|
Poly(ADP-ribose)
polymerase (PARP) enzymes |
|
| ADPRT |
Protects strand
interruptions |
1q42 |
NM_001618 |
| ADPRTL2 |
PARP-like
enzyme |
14q11.2-q12 |
NM_005485 |
| ADPRTL3 |
PARP-like
enzyme |
3p21.1-p22.2 |
AF085734 |
| Direct
reversal of damage |
| MGMT |
O6-meG
alkyltransferase |
10q26 |
NM_002412 |
| Mismatch
excision repair (MMR) |
| MSH2 |
Mismatch and loop
recognition |
2p22-p21 |
NM_000251 |
| MSH3 |
Mismatch and loop
recognition |
5q11-q12 |
NM_002439 |
| MSH6 |
Mismatch
recognition |
2p16 |
NM_000179 |
| MSH4 |
MutS homolog specialized
for meiosis |
1p31 |
NM_002440 |
| MSH5 |
MutS homolog specialized
for meiosis |
6p21.3 |
NM_002441 |
| PMS1 |
Mitochondrial MutL
homolog |
2q31.1 |
NM_000534 |
| MLH1 |
MutL
homolog |
3p21.3 |
NM_000249 |
| PMS2 |
MutL
homolog |
7p22 |
NM_000535 |
| MLH3 |
MutL homolog of unknown
function |
14q24.3 |
NM_014381 |
| PMS2L3 |
MutL homolog of unknown
function |
7q11-q22 |
D38437 |
| PMS2L4 |
MutL homolog of unknown
function |
7q11-q22 |
D38438 |
| Nucleotide
excision repair (NER) |
| XPC |
Binds damaged DNA as
complex |
3p25 |
NM_004628 |
| RAD23B (HR23B) |
Binds damaged DNA as
complex |
3p25.1 |
NM_002874 |
| CETN2 |
Binds damaged DNA as
complex |
Xq28 |
NM_004344 |
| RAD23A (HR23A) |
Substitutes for
HR23B |
19p13.2 |
NM_005053 |
| XPA |
Binds damaged DNA in
preincision complex |
9q22.3 |
NM_000380 |
| RPA1 |
Binds DNA in
preincision complex |
17p13.3 |
NM_ 002945 |
| RPA2 |
Binds DNA in
preincision complex |
1p35 |
NM_002946 |
| RPA3 |
Binds DNA in
preincision
complex |
7p22 |
NM_002947 |
| TFIIH |
Catalyzes unwinding
in preincision complex |
| XPB (ERCC3) |
3'
to 5' DNA helicase |
2q21 |
NM_000122 |
| XPD (ERCC2) |
5' to 3' DNA
helicase |
19q13.2-q13.3 |
X52221 |
| GTF2H1 |
Core TFIIH subunit
p62 |
11p15.1-p14 |
NM_005316 |
| GTF2H2 |
Core TFIIH subunit
p44 |
5q12.2-q13.3 |
NM_001515 |
| GTF2H3 |
Core TFIIH subunit
p34 |
12q |
NM_001516 |
| GTF2H4 |
Core TFIIH subunit
p52 |
6p21.3 |
NM_001517 |
| CDK7 |
Kinase subunit of
TFIIH |
2p15-cen |
NM_001799 |
| CCNH |
Kinase subunit of
TFIIH |
5q13.3-q14 |
NM_001239 |
| MNAT1 |
Kinase subunit of
TFIIH |
14q23 |
NM_002431 |
| XPG (ERCC5) |
3'
incision |
13q33 |
NM_000123 |
| ERCC1 |
5' incision
subunit |
19q13.2-q13.3 |
NM_001983 |
| XPF (ERCC4) |
5'
incision
subunit |
16p13.3-p13.13 |
NM_005236 |
| LIG1 |
DNA
joining |
19q13.2-q13.3 |
NM_000234 |
| NER-related |
| CSA
(CKN1) |
Cockayne syndrome; needed for transcription-coupled
NER |
5q12-q31 |
NM_000082 |
| CSB (ERCC6) |
Cockayne syndrome;
needed for transcription-coupled NER |
10q11 |
NM_000124 |
| XAB2
(HCNP) |
Cockayne syndrome; needed for transcription-coupled
NER |
19 |
NM_020196 |
| DDB1 |
Complex defective in XP group
E |
11q12-q13 |
NM_001923 |
| DDB2 |
Mutated in XP group
E |
11p12-p11 |
NM_000107 |
| MMS19 |
Transcription and
NER |
10q24.1 |
AW852889 |
| Homologous
recombination |
| RAD51 |
Homologous
pairing |
15q15.1 |
NM_002875 |
| RAD51L1 (RAD51B) |
Rad51
homolog |
14q23-q24 |
U84138 |
| RAD51C |
Rad51
homolog |
17q11-qter |
NM_002876 |
| RAD51L3 (RAD51D) |
Rad51
homolog |
17q11 |
NM_002878 |
| Gene name
(synonyms) |
Activity |
Chromosome location |
Accession number |
|
| DMC1 |
Rad51
homolog, meiosis |
22q13.1 |
NM_007068 |
| XRCC2 |
DNA break and
cross-link repair |
7q36.1 |
NM_005431 |
| XRCC3 |
DNA break and
cross-link repair |
14q32.3 |
NM_005432 |
| RAD52 |
Accessory factor
for recombination |
12p13-p12.2 |
NM_002879 |
| RAD54L |
Accessory
factor for recombination |
1p32 |
NM_003579 |
| RAD54B |
Accessory
factor for
recombination |
8q21.3-q22 |
NM_012415 |
| BRCA1 |
Accessory factor
for transcription and
recombination |
17q21 |
NM_007295 |
| BRCA2 |
Cooperation with RAD51,
essential function |
13q12.3 |
NM_000059 |
| RAD50 |
ATPase in
complex with MRE11A, NBS1 |
5q31 |
NM_005732 |
| MRE11A |
3'
exonuclease |
11q21 |
NM_005590 |
| NBS1 |
Mutated in Nijmegen
breakage
syndrome |
8q21-q24 |
NM_002485 |
| mdit>Nonhomologous
end-joining |
| Ku70 (G22P1) |
DNA end
binding |
22q13.2-q13.31 |
NM_001469 |
| Ku80 (XRCC5) |
DNA end
binding |
2q35 |
M30938 |
| PRKDC |
DNA-dependent protein kinase
catalytic subunit |
8q11 |
NM_006904 |
| LIG4 |
Nonhomologous
end-joining |
13q33-q34 |
NM_002312 |
| XRCC4 |
Nonhomologous
end-joining |
5q13-q14 |
NM_003401 |
| Sanitization
of nucleotide pools |
| MTH1
(NUDT1) |
8-oxoGTPase |
7p22 |
NM_002452 |
| DUT |
dUTPase |
15q15-q21.1 |
NM_001948 |
| DNA
polymerases (catalytic subunits) |
| POLB |
BER in nuclear
DNA |
8p11.2 |
NM_002690 |
| POLG |
BER in mitochondrial
DNA |
15q25 |
NM_002693 |
| POLD1 |
NER and
MMR |
19q13.3 |
NM_002691 |
| POLE1 |
NER and
MMR |
12q24.3 |
NM_006231 |
| PCNA |
Sliding clamp for pol delta and
pol epsilon |
20p12 |
NM_002592 |
| REV3L (POLZ) |
DNA pol zeta
catalytic subunit, essential function |
6q21 |
NM_002912 |
| REV7
(MAD2L2) |
DNA pol zeta subunit |
1p36 |
NM_006341 |
| REV1 |
dCMP
transferase |
2q11.1-q11.2 |
NM_016316 |
| POLH |
XP
variant |
6p12.2-p21.1 |
NM_006502 |
| POLI (RAD30B) |
Lesion
bypass |
18q21.1 |
NM_007195 |
| POLQ |
DNA cross-link
repair |
3q13.31 |
NM_006596 |
| DINB1 (POLK) |
Lesion
bypass |
5q13 |
NM_016218 |
| POLL |
Meiotic
function |
10q23 |
NM_013274 |
| POLM |
Presumed specialized lymphoid
function |
7p13 |
NM_013284 |
| TRF4-1 |
Sister-chromatid
cohesion |
5p15 |
AF089896 |
| TRF4-2 |
Sister-chromatid
cohesion |
16p13.3 |
AF089897 |
| Editing
and processing nucleases |
| FEN1 (DNase IV) |
5'
nuclease |
11q12 |
NM_004111 |
| TREX1 (DNase III) |
3'
exonuclease |
3p21.2-p21.3 |
NM_007248 |
| TREX2 |
3'
exonuclease |
Xq28 |
NM_007205 |
| EX01 (HEX1) |
5'
exonuclease |
1q42-q43 |
NM_003686 |
| SPO11 |
endonuclease |
20q13.2-q13.3 |
NM_012444 |
| Rad6
pathway |
| UBE2A (RAD6A) |
Ubiquitin-conjugating
enzyme |
Xq24-q25 |
NM_003336 |
| UBE2B
(RAD6B) |
Ubiquitin-conjugating
enzyme |
5q23-q31 |
NM_003337 |
| RAD18 |
Assists repair or
replication of damaged DNA |
3p24-p25 |
AB035274 |
| UBE2VE
(MMS2) |
Ubiquitin-conjugating complex |
8p |
AF049140 |
| UBE2N
(UBC13, BTG1) |
Ubiquitin-conjugating
complex |
12 |
NM_003348 |
| Genes
defective in diseases associated with sensitivity to DNA damaging
agents |
| BLM |
Bloom syndrome
helicase |
15q26.1 |
NM_000057 |
| WRN |
Werner syndrome
helicase/3'-exonuclease |
8p12-p11.2 |
NM_000553 |
| RECQL4 |
Rothmund-Thompson
syndrome |
8q24.3 |
NM_004260 |
| ATM |
Ataxia
telangiectasia |
11q22-q23 |
NM_000051 |
| Fanconi
anemia |
| FANCA |
Involved in tolerance or repair of DNA
cross-links |
16q24.3 |
NM_000135 |
| FANCB |
Involved in tolerance
or repair of DNA cross-links |
N/A |
N/A |
| FANCC |
Involved in
tolerance or repair of DNA
cross-links |
9q22.3 |
NM_000136 |
| FANCD |
Involved in tolerance or
repair of DNA cross-links |
3p26-p22 |
N/A |
| FANCE |
Involved in
tolerance or repair of DNA
cross-links |
6p21-p22 |
NM_021922 |
| FANCF |
Involved in tolerance
or repair of DNA cross-links |
11p15 |
AF181994 |
| FANCG
(XRCC9) |
Involved in tolerance or repair of DNA
cross-links |
9p13 |
NM_004629 |
| Other
identified genes with a suspected DNA repair
function |
| SNM1 (PS02) |
DNA cross-link
repair |
10q25 |
D42045 |
| SNM1B |
Related to
SNM1 |
1p13.1-p13.3 |
AL137856 |
| SNM1C |
Related to
SNM1 |
10 |
AA315885 |
| RPA4 |
Similar to
RPA2 |
Xq |
NM_013347 |
| ABH (ALKB) |
Resistance to alkylation
damage |
14q24 |
X91992 |
| PNKP |
Converts some DNA breaks to
ligatable ends |
19q13.3-q13.4 |
NM_007254 |
| Gene name
(synonyms) |
Activity |
Chromosome location |
Accession number |
|
| Other
conserved DNA damage response
genes |
| ATR |
ATM- and PI-3K-like
essential kinase |
3q22-q24 |
NM_001184 |
| RAD1
(S. pombe) homolog |
PCNA-like DNA damage
sensor |
5p13.3-p13.2 |
NM_002853 |
| RAD9 (S. pombe)
homolog |
PCNA-like DNA damage
sensor |
11q13.1-q13.2 |
NM_004584 |
| HUS1 (S. pombe)
homolog |
PCNA-like DNA damage
sensor |
7p13-p12 |
NM_004507 |
| RAD17 (RAD24) |
RFC-like DNA damage
sensor |
5q13 |
NM_002873 |
| TP53BP1 |
BRCT
protein |
15q15-q21 |
NM_005657 |
| CHEK1 |
Effector
kinase |
11q22-q23 |
NM_001274 |
| CHK2 (Rad53) |
Effector
kinase |
22q12.1 |
NM_007194 |
|
The functions required for the three distinct forms of excision repair
are described separately. These are base excision repair (BER),
nucleotide excision repair (NER), and mismatch repair (MMR). Additional
sections discuss direct reversal of DNA damage, recombination and
rejoining pathways for repair of DNA strand breaks, and DNA polymerases
that can bypass DNA damage.
The BER proteins excise and replace damaged DNA bases, mainly those
arising from endogenous oxidative and hydrolytic decay of DNA
(1). DNA glycosylases initiate this process by releasing the
modified base. This is followed by cleavage of the sugar-phosphate
chain, excision of the abasic residue, and local DNA synthesis and
ligation. Cell nuclei and mitochondria contain several related but
nonidentical DNA glycosylases obtained through alternative splicing of
transcripts. Three different nuclear DNA glycosylases counteract
oxidative damage, and a fourth mainly excises alkylated purines.
Remarkably, four of the eight identified DNA glycosylases can remove
uracil from DNA. Each of them has a specialized function,
however. UNG, which is homologous to the Escherichia
coli Ung enzyme, is associated with DNA replication forks and
corrects uracil misincorporated opposite adenine. SMUG1, which is unique to higher eukaryotes, probably removes the uracil that
arises in DNA by deamination of cytosine. MBD4 excises uracil and
thymine specifically at deaminated CpG and 5-methyl-CpG sequences, and
TDG removes ethenoC, a product of lipid peroxidation, and also slowly
removes uracil and thymine at G·U and G·T base pairs. The existence
of multiple proteins with similar activities is a recurring theme in
human DNA repair (1). Another illustration of this is the
set of at least four adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent DNA
ligases encoded by three genes, with LIG3-XRCC1 providing the main
nick-joining function for BER.
Until recently, only one endonuclease for abasic sites had been
found encoded in the human genome, although there are two each in
E. coli and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
and three genes are predicted in the genome of the plant
Arabidopsis thaliana. A second human gene, APE2,
has recently appeared. Apparently this encodes a minor activity, as
deletion of the major gene APE1 causes early embryonic
lethality in mice. Repair of the DNA replication-blocking lesion
3-methyladenine is another case where the human genome is frugal. In
other organisms, several DNA glycosylases, unrelated at the primary
sequence level, can remove 3-meA. Among them are Tag1 of E. coli, AlkA of E. coli (similar to MAG of S. cerevisiae), and MPG in higher eukaryotes. Only the MPG enzyme has
been characterized so far in the human genome. This is in contrast to
the at least two alkA and six tag1 homologs found
in Arabidopsis (5). However, like the genomes of
other multicellular animals, the current human genome draft contains no
obvious tag1 and alkA homologs (6).
A few unusual enzymes reverse rather than excise DNA damage. The human
MGMT removes methyl groups and other small alkyl groups from the
O6 position of guanine. There are two such proteins (Ada
and Ogt) in E. coli, but no additional homologs have been
detected in the human genome sequence. MGMT resembles the COOH-terminal
half of Ada. The NH2-terminal half of E. coli
Ada can remove a methyl group from a DNA phosphate residue. We
found no homologs of this region of Ada, and it remains unclear whether
such backbone methylations are repaired in human cells.
Many organisms contain photolyases that can monomerize lesions induced
by UV light such as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and (6-4)
photoproducts. The human genome has two CRY genes with
similarity to photolyase sequences. These encode blue light
photoreceptors involved in setting of circadian rhythms but not in
photoreactivation of DNA damage. We have not detected additional
homologs of DNA repair photolyases in the human genome, confirming
previous reports that photolyase activity is present in many
vertebrates including fish, reptiles, and marsupials, but not in
placental mammals.
NER mainly removes bulky adducts caused by environmental
agents. In E. coli, the three polypeptides UvrA, UvrB, and
UvrC can locate a lesion and incise on either side of it to
remove a segment of nucleotides containing the damage. Eukaryotes,
including yeast and human cells, do not have direct UvrABC homologs but
use a more elaborate assembly of gene products to carry out NER
(1). For example, E. coli UvrA can bind to sites
of DNA damage, whereas at least four different human NER factors have
this property (the XPC complex, DDB complex, XPA, and RPA). The
formation of an unwound preincision intermediate in human cells
requires two DNA helicases, XPB and XPD, instead of the single UvrB in
E. coli, and there are dedicated human nucleases (XPG and
ERCC1-XPF) for each of the two incisions, instead of the single UvrC in
bacteria. S. cerevisiae encodes two additional gene
products, Rad7 and Rad16, which are important for NER. No convincing
homologs to these can be identified in the human genome, although Rad16
is a difficult case because it is a member of the amply represented
Swi/Snf family of DNA-stimulated adenosine triphosphatases (ATPases).
Some organisms such as the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces
pombe have a second system for excision of pyrimidine dimers, initiated by a UVDE nuclease. The human genome apparently lacks a
homolog of this nuclease and has no such backup system, consistent with
the fact that cells from NER-defective xeroderma pigmentosum patients
totally lack the ability to remove pyrimidine dimers from DNA.
The transcribed strand of active human genes is repaired faster than
the nontranscribed strand in a transcription-coupled repair process
known to involve the products of CSA, CSB, and XAB2. The mechanism of such transcription-coupled repair is
not known, and future investigation is expected to reveal additional participants.
MMR corrects occasional errors of DNA replication as well as
heterologies formed during recombination. The bacterial mutS and mutL genes encode proteins responsible for identifying
mismatches, and there are numerous homologs of these genes in the human
genome, of greater variety than those found in yeast, Drosophila
melanogaster, or Caenorhabditis elegans. Some of these
proteins are specialized for locating distinct types of mismatches in
DNA, some are specialized for meiotic recombination, and some have
functions yet to be determined. In E. coli, the newly
synthesized DNA strand is identified with the aid of the MutH
endonuclease, which has no human ortholog. Strand discrimination in
human cells may be signaled instead by the orientation of components of
the DNA replication complex such as PCNA or by other factors not yet
identified.
DNA double-strand breaks may be rectified by either homologous or
nonhomologous recombination pathways. Particularly notable in the human
sequence is the presence of at least seven genes encoding proteins
distantly related to the single Rad51 of S. cerevisiae and
the single RecA of E. coli. The latter proteins function in
strand pairing and exchange during recombination. By comparison, four
members of the Rad51 family have been found in the
Drosophila genome (7) and four in
Arabidopsis (5). Homologous recombination in
human cells is likely to involve branch migration enzymes and
resolvases that are functionally analogous to the bacterial RuvABC
system. Recent biochemical experiments have revealed human activities
for such concerted branch migration/resolution reactions, but the
responsible gene products have not yet been identified (8).
The nonhomologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) involves the factors
listed in Table 1, and additional components will most likely be
discovered. For example, the DNA-dependent protein kinase is believed
to phosphorylate key molecules involved in the repair process. These
substrates have yet to be fully defined.
Single-strand interruptions in DNA can be rectified by enzymes from the
BER pathway. Enzymes of the PARP family, as well as XRCC1, temporarily
bind to single-strand interruptions in DNA and may act to recruit
repair proteins. We have not listed the telomere-binding proteins
protecting the ends of chromosomes, but one member of the PARP family,
tankyrase, is present in this complex.
During the past year, the human genome sequence has revealed many
previously unrecognized DNA polymerases (1). There are
currently at least 15 DNA polymerases in humans, exceeding the number
found in any other organism. For repair of nuclear DNA, the main form
of BER uses Pol , whereas Pol or Pol are the main enzymes
employed for NER and MMR. Genetic and biochemical evidence has
implicated many of the newly discovered polymerases in the DNA damage
response, but others may have specialized roles such as sister
chromatid cohesion. Table 1 includes the catalytic
subunits of these DNA polymerases, but not other subunits and
DNA polymerase cofactors.
REV3L, the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase ,
illustrates how DNA sequence homology searches can yield unexpected
results. The DNA polymerase domain at the COOH-terminus of the human
protein resembles S. cerevisiae Rev3, but most of the first
2000 amino acids are not present in the yeast protein. A second human
gene highly homologous to 1200 residues in this region (outside the polymerase domains) is encoded on the X chromosome (accession number
AL139395). It is premature to classify this as a DNA repair gene, but
study of it is expected to shed light on the function of REV3L.
The human genome sequence has already markedly
influenced the field of DNA repair. Many of the genes listed were
discovered as investigators searched the expanding database for
sequence similarity to genes discovered in model organisms. This
approach will no doubt continue, and new human genes will be identified as additional repair functions are identified in other systems. One
source that is likely to be fruitful is the genome of Deinococcus radiodurans (9). This bacterium has an exceptionally high resistance to DNA-damaging agents, especially ionizing radiation, in comparison to other microorganisms. Some of the currently
uncharacterized genes in D. radiodurans are expected to
contribute to DNA repair, and it remains to be seen if there will be
homologs of such functions in the human genome.
The sequence database also makes it increasingly straightforward to use
mass spectrometry fingerprinting to identify new subunits of repair
protein complexes (10). In this sensitive technique,
isolated proteins are digested with an enzyme such as trypsin, and the
exact molecular masses of the resulting fragments are measured.
Comparison of these fragments with a computer-simulated tryptic digest
of each human gene product can unambiguously identify the protein.
In addition, new genes will be found as novel
biochemical assays are developed for various aspects of repair. For
example, human cells can repair cross-links between the two DNA
strands. Interstrand cross-links are generated by natural psoralen
compounds and their chemotherapeutic derivatives, by other drugs used
for cancer treatment such as nitrogen mustards, and to some extent by
ionizing and ultraviolet radiation. Repair of such cross-links involves
the NER genes and the XRCC2 and XRCC3 recombination genes and is
predicted to involve the DNA polymerase POLQ. In addition, the
sensitivity of cells from individuals with Fanconi anemia (FA) points
to a role for the FANC group of genes in cross-link repair. However,
the mechanism of interstrand DNA cross-link repair remains obscure, and
further investigation may implicate even more gene products.
Several other classes of DNA damage exist for which repair has
been relatively unexplored. New genes may be identified, for instance,
involved in the repair of damage caused by lipid peroxidation (1). Other uncharacterized forms of DNA damage caused by
reactive metabolites and catabolites may be found. For example, the
genome is dynamic, and single-stranded regions are temporarily exposed
during DNA replication and gene transcription. Positions that are
normally protected by base-pairing within the double helical structure
are then vulnerable to group-specific reagents, creating new classes of
lesions. Alkylating agents can form the cytotoxic lesions
1-methyladenine and 3-methylcytosine in single-stranded DNA, and new
repair strategies may be needed to remove such lesions.
DNA is assembled into several levels of ordered chromatin structure,
and so DNA metabolic processes need a close connection with proteins
that allow chromatin remodeling or disassembly. Several human chromatin
remodeling complexes are known, for instance, that allow and control
access to DNA during gene transcription (11). The great
majority of enzymological DNA repair studies to date have worked with
naked DNA, but chromatin presents a substantial barrier to recognition
of DNA damage. It is expected that human protein complexes will be
found that are dedicated to DNA repair and recombination, facilitating
access of DNA repair enzymes to the genome.
The three-dimensional structures of DNA repair proteins are being
determined at an ever-increasing pace (12). Structural biologists will soon turn their attention to open reading frames of
unknown function, and new repair genes will become apparent in the
process. As an example, the functionally related SMUG1, TDG, and UNG
enzymes show little or no primary sequence homology yet have common
structural folds and belong to a single protein superfamily
(13). As the structures of new protein folds are documented,
more members of DNA repair enzyme families are likely to be found with
the aid of three-dimensional structure prediction models. In this way,
the new field of structural genomics will help guide functional studies
of presently uncharacterized open reading frames in the human genome.
For an impressive number of genes involved in human DNA repair,
disruptions of the corresponding murine genes have been reported (14), are in progress, or have recently been
constructed. The results are beginning to guide searches for additional
DNA repair enzymes. Knockouts of DNA glycosylases in mice have
unexpectedly mild consequences by comparison with budding yeast and
E. coli models. This implies that more backup systems exist,
probably because endogenous damage presents a more frequent problem for larger genomes.
As the genes from the human genome sequence continue to be
cataloged, studying the activity of the protein products will become increasingly important. More effective methods for rapid expression of
active proteins will be required to test for possible functions. An
alternative approach is to selectively inactivate individual proteins
in vivo. An efficient method for selective proteolytic destruction has
been successful in budding yeast (15) and should be
extendable to mammalian cells. Alternatively, systematic interference
with gene expression with the use of inhibitory RNA molecules, as
employed successfully in C. elegans (16), is proving to be a powerful way to dissect gene functions.
Intense activity is being devoted to understanding how DNA damage
transmits signals to the cell-cycle checkpoint machinery and to the
monitoring systems that control cellular apoptosis. There is recent
progress on this complex extended network, which involves damage
recognition factors, protein kinases, and transcription factors such as
p53 (17). Attempts are already being made to obtain
an integrated picture of DNA repair with regard to signaling
(18). The subject is of great interest as some inherited
human syndromes associated with sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents
result from loss of functions such as ATM, which is involved in damage
sensing.
New clinical applications relating to human DNA repair genes are
certain to emerge. Tumor cells often acquire resistance to therapeutic
drugs or radiation. Genomics approaches such as array technology will
be used to define any DNA repair genes that may be overexpressed in
this context. Furthermore, it will be important to find ways to
specifically inhibit DNA repair in these resistant cells by targeting
the key enzymes. Genetic polymorphisms in relevant repair genes will be
identified and efforts made to correlate them with effects on activity
of the respective proteins, with response to particular therapies and
with clinical outcomes. Although a number of polymorphisms in DNA
repair genes are being reported, there is presently little functional
information on the consequences of the attendant amino acid changes. It
will be important to find out which polymorphisms actually affect
protein function and then concentrate on these in epidemiological and
clinical studies. For example, homozygosity for a particular
polymorphism in the DNA ligase subunit XRCC1 is associated with higher
sister chromatid exchange frequencies in smokers, suggesting an
association of this allele with a higher risk for tobacco- and
age-related DNA damage (19). Larger studies and comparison
with other polymorphisms having known biochemical effects will be
needed to further validate and extend these findings.
Furthermore, with the use of gene and protein array techniques, it
should be possible to compare expression profiles of DNA repair genes
in normal and tumor cells--information that could eventually lead to
individually tailored therapies with chemicals and radiation. For
example, tumors with low levels of NER should be more susceptible to
treatment with cisplatin (20). In experimental systems,
MMR-deficient cells are highly tolerant to alkylating chemotherapeutic
drugs. MMR-defective tumors such as those found in hereditary
nonpolyposis colon cancer may be resistant to treatment with such
agents (21).
Some variation in DNA repair gene expression is epigenetic in origin
and has been found for instance with MGMT and MSH6 (22). The
MGMT gene promoter is often methylated in gliomas, resulting in
suppressed expression that can be associated with an improved response
after tumor treatment with an alkylating agent (23). The
complete human genome sequence now allows the definition of promoter
regions so that the DNA methylation status of relevant CpG islands can
be investigated readily. Finally, DNA repair, especially repair of
oxidative damage, has often been suggested as a relevant factor in
counteracting aging. An examination of polymorphisms and gene
expression levels in human DNA repair genes and a comparison with the
equivalent genes in shorter lived mammalian species should help
determine the importance of DNA repair in normal aging processes.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
-
T. Lindahl and
R. D. Wood,
Science
286,
1897
(1999)
.
-
The data in this paper were based on searches of the Ensembl
sequence data freeze of 17 July 2000 and analysis updates as of 13 December 2000; seewww.ensembl.org. Additional data were from the
Golden Path server at the University of California at Santa Cruz
(http://genome.ucsc.edu/). Expressed sequence tag (EST)
searches used dbEST [
M. S. Boguski,
T. M. Lowe,
C. M. Tolstoshev,
Nature Genet.
4,
332
(1993)
].
-
J. A. Eisen and
P. C. Hanawalt,
Mutat. Res. DNA Repair
435,
171
(1999)
.
-
L. Aravind,
D. R. Walker,
E. V. Koonin,
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
1223
(1999)
.
-
The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, Nature
408, 796 (2000).
-
An exact match to much of E. coli tag1 was found
(AC010537.2), indicating that there is occasional contamination of the
draft sequence that warrants caution.
-
J. J. Sekelsky,
M. H. Brodsky,
K. C. Burtis,
J. Cell Biol.
150,
F31
(2000)
.
-
A. Constantinou,
A. A. Davies,
S. C. West,
Cell
104,
259
(2001)
.
-
O. White et al., Science
286, 1571 (1999).
-
R. E. Banks et al., Lancet
356, 1749 (2000).
-
M. Vignali,
A. H. Hassan,
K. E. Neely,
J. L. Workman,
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1899
(2000)
.
-
J. A. Tainer and
E. C. Friedberg,
Mutat. Res.
460,
139
(2000)
. See also the other reviews on the
structural biology of DNA repair in this August 2000 issue.
-
K. A. Haushalter,
M. W. Todd-Stukenberg,
M. W. Kirschner,
G. L. Verdine,
Curr. Biol.
9,
174
(1999)
; L. Aravind, E. V. Koonin, Genome Biol.
1, research0007.1 (2000) (available at
genomebiology.com/2000/1/4/research/0007).
-
E. C. Friedberg and
L. B. Meira,
Mutat. Res. DNA Repair
459,
243
(2000)
.
-
K. Labib,
J. A. Tercero,
J. F. X. Diffley,
Science
288,
1643
(2000)
.
-
P. Gonczy et al., Nature 408,
331 (2000); A. G. Fraser et al., Nature
408, 325 (2000).
-
B. B. S. Zhou and
S. J. Elledge,
Nature
408,
433
(2000)
.
-
K. W. Kohn,
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
2703
(1999)
.
-
E. J. Duell et al., Carcinogenesis
21, 965 (2000).
-
B. Köberle,
J. R. W. Masters,
J. A. Hartley,
R. D. Wood,
Curr. Biol.
9,
273
(1999)
.
-
N. Claij, H. te Riele, Exp. Cell Res.
246, 1 (1999).
-
A. Bearzatto,
M. Szadkowski,
P. Macpherson,
J. Jiricny,
P. Karran,
Cancer Res.
60,
3262
(2000)
.
-
M. Esteller et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 1350 (2000).
-
Supplemental material is available on Science
Online at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/291/5507/1284/DC1.
27 September 2000; accepted 9 January
2001
10.1126/science.1056154 Include this information when citing this paper.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
- Genetic variants in DNA repair pathway genes and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric adenocarcinoma in a Chinese population.
- W.-Q. Li, N. Hu, P. L. Hyland, Y. Gao, Z.-M. Wang, K. Yu, H. Su, C.-Y. Wang, L.-M. Wang, S. J. Chanock, et al. (2013)
Carcinogenesis
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Gene Expression Profiles in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Chinese Nickel Refinery Workers with High Exposures to Nickel and Control Subjects.
- A. Arita, A. Munoz, Y. Chervona, J. Niu, Q. Qu, N. Zhao, Y. Ruan, K. Kiok, T. Kluz, H. Sun, et al. (2013)
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
22, 261-269
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Copy Number Variations of DNA Repair Genes and the Age-Related Cataract: Jiangsu Eye Study.
- J. Jiang, J. Zhou, Y. Yao, R. Zhu, C. Liang, S. Jiang, M. Yang, Y. Lu, Q. Xing, and H. Guan (2013)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
54, 932-938
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- The Associations between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of DNA Repair Genes, DNA Damage, and Age-Related Cataract: Jiangsu Eye Study.
- S. Su, Y. Yao, R. Zhu, C. Liang, S. Jiang, N. Hu, J. Zhou, M. Yang, Q. Xing, and H. Guan (2013)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
54, 1201-1207
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- The Contribution of XRCC6/Ku70 to Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan.
- C.-M. HSU, M.-D. YANG, W.-S. CHANG, L.-B. JENG, M.-H. LEE, M.-C. LU, S.-C. CHANG, C.-W. TSAI, Y. TSAI, F.-J. TSAI, et al. (2013)
Anticancer Res
33, 529-535
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- The Role of XRCC6 T-991C Functional Polymorphism in Renal Cell Carcinoma.
- W.-S. CHANG, H.-L. KE, C.-W. TSAI, C.-S. LIEN, W.-L. LIAO, H.-H. LIN, M.-H. LEE, H.-C. WU, C.-H. CHANG, C.-C. CHEN, et al. (2012)
Anticancer Res
32, 3855-3860
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Genetic variation in nucleotide excision repair pathway genes, pesticide exposure and prostate cancer risk.
- K. H. Barry, S. Koutros, G. Andreotti, D. P. Sandler, L. A. Burdette, M. Yeager, L. E. Beane Freeman, J. H. Lubin, X. Ma, T. Zheng, et al. (2012)
Carcinogenesis
33, 331-337
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Quantitative comparison between in vivo DNA adduct formation from exposure to selected DNA-reactive carcinogens, natural background levels of DNA adduct formation and tumour incidence in rodent bioassays.
- A. Paini, G. Scholz, M. Marin-Kuan, B. Schilter, J. O'Brien, P. J. van Bladeren, and I. M. C. M. Rietjens (2011)
Mutagenesis
26, 605-618
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase and DNA polymerase {beta} modulate BER inhibitor potentiation of glioma cells to temozolomide.
- J.-b. Tang, D. Svilar, R. N. Trivedi, X.-h. Wang, E. M. Goellner, B. Moore, R. L. Hamilton, L. A. Banze, A. R. Brown, and R. W. Sobol (2011)
Neuro Oncology
13, 471-486
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Ala499Val (C > T) and Lys939Gln (A > C) polymorphisms of the XPC gene: their correlation with the risk of primary gallbladder adenocarcinoma--a case-control study in China.
- X. Jiao, J. Ren, H. Chen, J. Ma, S. Rao, K. Huang, S. Wu, J. Fu, X. Su, C. Luo, et al. (2011)
Carcinogenesis
32, 496-501
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- REPAIRtoire--a database of DNA repair pathways.
- K. Milanowska, J. Krwawicz, G. Papaj, J. Kosinski, K. Poleszak, J. Lesiak, E. Osinska, K. Rother, and J. M. Bujnicki (2011)
Nucleic Acids Res.
39, D788-D792
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Identification of Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase as a Novel DNA Damage Repair Enzyme in Arabidopsis.
- S.-Y. Lee, H. Kim, H.-J. Hwang, Y.-M. Jeong, S. H. Na, J.-C. Woo, and S.-G. Kim (2010)
Plant Physiology
154, 1460-1469
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Gamma-radiation sensitivity and polymorphisms in RAD51L1 modulate glioma risk.
- Y. Liu, S. Shete, L.-E. Wang, R. El-Zein, C. J. Etzel, F.-W. Liang, G. Armstrong, S. Tsavachidis, M. R. Gilbert, K. D. Aldape, et al. (2010)
Carcinogenesis
31, 1762-1769
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Polymorphisms of the DNA Repair Genes XPD and XRCC1 and the Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
- E. Gorgun, M. Guven, M. Unal, B. Batar, G. S. Guven, M. Yenerel, S. Tatlipinar, M. Seven, and A. Yuksel (2010)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
51, 4732-4737
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Structure determination of DNA methylation lesions N1-meA and N3-meC in duplex DNA using a cross-linked protein-DNA system.
- L. Lu, C. Yi, X. Jian, G. Zheng, and C. He (2010)
Nucleic Acids Res.
38, 4415-4425
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- DNA Replication Factor C1 Mediates Genomic Stability and Transcriptional Gene Silencing in Arabidopsis.
- Q. Liu, J. Wang, D. Miki, R. Xia, W. Yu, J. He, Z. Zheng, J.-K. Zhu, and Z. Gong (2010)
PLANT CELL
22, 2336-2352
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- DDB2 Complex-Mediated Ubiquitylation around DNA Damage Is Oppositely Regulated by XPC and Ku and Contributes to the Recruitment of XPA.
- A. Takedachi, M. Saijo, and K. Tanaka (2010)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
30, 2708-2723
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Genetic polymorphisms of XRCC1, HOGG1 and MGMT and micronucleus occurrence in Chinese vinyl chloride-exposed workers.
- Q. Wang, F. Ji, Y. Sun, Y.-L. Qiu, W. Wang, F. Wu, W.-b. Miao, Y. Li, P. W. Brandt-Rauf, and Z.-l. Xia (2010)
Carcinogenesis
31, 1068-1073
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Oocyte Numbers in the Mouse Increase after Treatment with 5-Aminoisoquinolinone: A Potent Inhibitor of Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation.
- H. Qian, J. Xu, M. D. Lalioti, K. Gulle, and D. Sakkas (2010)
Biol Reprod
82, 1000-1007
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Possible Associations of APE1 Polymorphism with Susceptibility and HOGG1 Polymorphism with Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.
- E. CANBAY, B. AGACHAN, M. GULLUOGLU, T. ISBIR, E. BALIK, S. YAMANER, T. BULUT, C. CACINA, I. Y. ERALTAN, A. YILMAZ, et al. (2010)
Anticancer Res
30, 1359-1364
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- The DNA repair gene APE1 T1349G polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 27 case-control studies.
- D. Gu, M. Wang, M. Wang, Z. Zhang, and J. Chen (2009)
Mutagenesis
24, 507-512
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- DNA repair gene polymorphisms and risk of cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- S. Mocellin, D. Verdi, and D. Nitti (2009)
Carcinogenesis
30, 1735-1743
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Sequence Variant Discovery in DNA Repair Genes from Radiosensitive and Radiotolerant Prostate Brachytherapy Patients.
- T. J. Pugh, M. Keyes, L. Barclay, A. Delaney, M. Krzywinski, D. Thomas, K. Novik, C. Yang, A. Agranovich, M. McKenzie, et al. (2009)
Clin. Cancer Res.
15, 5008-5016
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease (APE1) Gene Polymorphisms and Lung Cancer Risk in Relation To Tobacco Smoking.
- B. AGACHAN, O. KUCUKHUSEYIN, P. AKSOY, A. TURNA, I. YAYLIM, U. GORMUS, A. ERGEN, U. ZEYBEK, B. DALAN, and T. ISBIR (2009)
Anticancer Res
29, 2417-2420
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Associations between Polymorphisms in DNA Repair Genes and Glioblastoma.
- R. McKean-Cowdin, J. Barnholtz-Sloan, P. D. Inskip, A. M. Ruder, M. Butler, P. Rajaraman, P. Razavi, J. Patoka, J. K. Wiencke, M. L. Bondy, et al. (2009)
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
18, 1118-1126
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Sensitivity to NNKOAc is associated with renal cancer risk.
- J. Clague, L. Shao, J. Lin, S. Chang, Y. Zhu, W. Wang, C. G. Wood, and X. Wu (2009)
Carcinogenesis
30, 706-710
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Bladder Cancer and Polymorphisms of DNA Repair Genes (XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD, XPG, APE1, hOGG1).
- K. F. NARTER, A. ERGEN, B. AGACHAN, U. GORMUS, O. TIMIRCI, and T. ISBIR (2009)
Anticancer Res
29, 1389-1393
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Common Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Genes and Breast Cancer Risk.
- K. A. Pooley, C. Baynes, K. E. Driver, J. Tyrer, E. M. Azzato, P. D.P. Pharoah, D. F. Easton, B. A.J. Ponder, and A. M. Dunning (2008)
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
17, 3482-3489
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Association between Polymorphisms in DNA Base Excision Repair Genes XRCC1, APE1, and ADPRT and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma.
- F.-Y. Chiang, C.-W. Wu, P.-J. Hsiao, W.-R. Kuo, K.-W. Lee, J.-C. Lin, Y.-C. Liao, and S.-H. H. Juo (2008)
Clin. Cancer Res.
14, 5919-5924
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Variants of DNA Repair Genes and the Risk of Biliary Tract Cancers and Stones: A Population-Based Study in China.
- M. Zhang, W.-Y. Huang, G. Andreotti, Y.-T. Gao, A. Rashid, J. Chen, L. C. Sakoda, M.-C. Shen, B.-S. Wang, S. Chanock, et al. (2008)
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
17, 2123-2127
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Human Methyl Purine DNA Glycosylase and DNA Polymerase {beta} Expression Collectively Predict Sensitivity to Temozolomide.
- R. N. Trivedi, X.-h. Wang, E. Jelezcova, E. M. Goellner, J.-b. Tang, and R. W. Sobol (2008)
Mol. Pharmacol.
74, 505-516
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Comprehensive association testing of common genetic variation in DNA repair pathway genes in relationship with breast cancer risk in multiple populations.
- C. A. Haiman, C. Hsu, P. I.W. de Bakker, M. Frasco, X. Sheng, D. Van Den Berg, J. T. Casagrande, L. N. Kolonel, L. Le Marchand, S. E. Hankinson, et al. (2008)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
17, 825-834
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- DNA Repair Gene hOGG1 Codon 326 and XRCC1 Codon 399 Polymorphisms and Bladder Cancer Risk in a Japanese Population.
- K. Arizono, Y. Osada, and Y. Kuroda (2008)
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.
38, 186-191
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Isolation of XAB2 Complex Involved in Pre-mRNA Splicing, Transcription, and Transcription-coupled Repair.
- I. Kuraoka, S. Ito, T. Wada, M. Hayashida, L. Lee, M. Saijo, Y. Nakatsu, M. Matsumoto, T. Matsunaga, H. Handa, et al. (2008)
J. Biol. Chem.
283, 940-950
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Do heat stress and deficits in DNA repair pathways have a negative impact on male fertility?.
- C. Paul, D. W. Melton, and P. T.K. Saunders (2008)
Mol. Hum. Reprod.
14, 1-8
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Selected base excision repair gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to biliary tract cancer and biliary stones: a population-based case-control study in China.
- W.-Y. Huang, Y.-T. Gao, A. Rashid, L. C. Sakoda, J. Deng, M.-C. Shen, B.-S. Wang, T.-Q. Han, B.-H. Zhang, B. E. Chen, et al. (2008)
Carcinogenesis
29, 100-105
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Prognostic Significance of p53 and X-ray Repair Cross-complementing Group 1 Polymorphisms on Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Post Radical Prostatectomy.
- S.-P. Huang, C.-Y. Huang, J.-S. Wang, C.-C. Liu, Y.-S. Pu, H.-J. Yu, C.-C. Yu, T. T. Wu, C.-H. Huang, W.-J. Wu, et al. (2007)
Clin. Cancer Res.
13, 6632-6638
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- High-order interactions among genetic polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair pathway genes and smoking in modulating bladder cancer risk.
- M. Chen, A. M. Kamat, M. Huang, H.B. Grossman, C. P. Dinney, S. P. Lerner, X. Wu, and J. Gu (2007)
Carcinogenesis
28, 2160-2165
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- DNA repair capacity of zebrafish.
- R. Sussman (2007)
PNAS
104, 13379-13383
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- APEX/Ref-1 (apurinic/apyrimidic endonuclease DNA-repair gene) expression in human and ascidian (Ciona intestinalis) gametes and embryos.
- S. El-Mouatassim, S. Bilotto, G. L. Russo, E. Tosti, and Y. Menezo (2007)
Mol. Hum. Reprod.
13, 549-556
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Amino acid substitution polymorphisms of the DNA repair gene MGMT and the susceptibility to cervical carcinoma.
- J. Huang, F. Ye, H. Chen, W. Lu, and X. Xie (2007)
Carcinogenesis
28, 1314-1322
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Structural Characterization of Human 8-Oxoguanine DNA Glycosylase Variants Bearing Active Site Mutations.
- C. T. Radom, A. Banerjee, and G. L. Verdine (2007)
J. Biol. Chem.
282, 9182-9194
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Genotypes, haplotypes and diplotypes of XPC and risk of bladder cancer.
- Y. Zhu, M. Lai, H. Yang, J. Lin, M. Huang, H.B. Grossman, C. P. Dinney, and X. Wu (2007)
Carcinogenesis
28, 698-703
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Association of Dnmt3a and thymine DNA glycosylase links DNA methylation with base-excision repair.
- Y.-Q. Li, P.-Z. Zhou, X.-D. Zheng, C. P. Walsh, and G.-L. Xu (2007)
Nucleic Acids Res.
35, 390-400
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Increased apoptosis, p53 up-regulation, and cerebellar neuronal degeneration in repair-deficient Cockayne syndrome mice.
- R. R. Laposa, E. J. Huang, and J. E. Cleaver (2007)
PNAS
104, 1389-1394
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- High-Order Interactions among Genetic Variants in DNA Base Excision Repair Pathway Genes and Smoking in Bladder Cancer Susceptibility.
- M. Huang, C. P. Dinney, X. Lin, J. Lin, H. B. Grossman, and X. Wu (2007)
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
16, 84-91
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Reduced Repair of the Oxidative 8-Oxoguanine DNA Damage and Risk of Head and Neck Cancer.
- T. Paz-Elizur, R. Ben-Yosef, D. Elinger, A. Vexler, M. Krupsky, A. Berrebi, A. Shani, E. Schechtman, L. Freedman, and Z. Livneh (2006)
Cancer Res.
66, 11683-11689
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Polymorphisms in the DNA Repair Genes XPC, XPD, and XPG and Risk of Cutaneous Melanoma: a Case-Control Analysis.
- C. Li, Z. Hu, Z. Liu, L.-E Wang, S. S. Strom, J. E. Gershenwald, J. E. Lee, M. I. Ross, P. F. Mansfield, J. N. Cormier, et al. (2006)
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
15, 2526-2532
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Genes Involved in DNA Repair and Nitrosamine Metabolism and Those Located on Chromosome 14q32 Are Dysregulated in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma..
- L. E. Dodd, S. Sengupta, I-H. Chen, J. A. den Boon, Y.-J. Cheng, W. Westra, M. A. Newton, B. F. Mittl, L. McShane, C.-J. Chen, et al. (2006)
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
15, 2216-2225
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- XRCC1 Arg399Gln Genetic Polymorphism in a Turkish Population.
- N. A. Kocabas and B. Karahalil (2006)
International Journal of Toxicology
25, 419-422
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Genetic variants of the ADPRT, XRCC1 and APE1 genes and risk of cutaneous melanoma.
- C. Li, Z. Liu, L.-E Wang, S. S. Strom, J. E. Lee, J. E. Gershenwald, M. I. Ross, P. F. Mansfield, J. N. Cormier, V. G. Prieto, et al. (2006)
Carcinogenesis
27, 1894-1901
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Base excision repair fidelity in normal and cancer cells.
- K. K.L. Chan, Q.-M. Zhang, and G. L. Dianov (2006)
Mutagenesis
21, 173-178
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Association of DNA Repair and Steroid Metabolism Gene Polymorphisms with Clinical Late Toxicity in Patients Treated with Conformal Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.
- S. Damaraju, D. Murray, J. Dufour, D. Carandang, S. Myrehaug, G. Fallone, C. Field, R. Greiner, J. Hanson, C. E. Cass, et al. (2006)
Clin. Cancer Res.
12, 2545-2554
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Frequent genomic alterations in epithelium measured by microsatellite instability following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in humans.
- P. Faber, P. Fisch, M. Waterhouse, A. Schmitt-Graff, H. Bertz, J. Finke, and A. Spyridonidis (2006)
Blood
107, 3389-3396
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Polymorphisms in the hMSH2 Gene and the Risk of Primary Lung Cancer..
- C. Y. Jung, J. E. Choi, J. M. Park, M. H. Chae, H.-G. Kang, K. M. Kim, S. J. Lee, W. K. Lee, S. Kam, S. I. Cha, et al. (2006)
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
15, 762-768
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Phosphorylation of Nucleotide Excision Repair Factor Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A by Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated and Rad3-Related-Dependent Checkpoint Pathway Promotes Cell Survival in Response to UV Irradiation..
- X. Wu, S. M. Shell, Z. Yang, and Y. Zou (2006)
Cancer Res.
66, 2997-3005
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and risk of non-small cell lung cancer.
- S. Zienolddiny, D. Campa, H. Lind, D. Ryberg, V. Skaug, L. Stangeland, D. H. Phillips, F. Canzian, and A. Haugen (2006)
Carcinogenesis
27, 560-567
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- The DDB1-CUL4ADDB2 ubiquitin ligase is deficient in xeroderma pigmentosum group E and targets histone H2A at UV-damaged DNA sites.
- M. G. Kapetanaki, J. Guerrero-Santoro, D. C. Bisi, C. L. Hsieh, V. Rapic-Otrin, and A. S. Levine (2006)
PNAS
103, 2588-2593
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Genetic polymorphisms in base-excision repair pathway genes and risk of breast cancer..
- Y. Zhang, P. A. Newcomb, K. M. Egan, L. Titus-Ernstoff, S. Chanock, R. Welch, L. A. Brinton, J. Lissowska, A. Bardin-Mikolajczak, B. Peplonska, et al. (2006)
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
15, 353-358
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Down-regulation of DNA mismatch repair proteins in human and murine tumor spheroids: implications for multicellular resistance to alkylating agents.
- G. Francia, S. K. Green, G. Bocci, S. Man, U. Emmenegger, J. M.L. Ebos, A. Weinerman, Y. Shaked, and R. S. Kerbel (2005)
Mol. Cancer Ther.
4, 1484-1494
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes in the molecular pathogenesis of esophageal (Barrett) adenocarcinoma.
- A. G. Casson, Z. Zheng, S. C. Evans, P. J. Veugelers, G. A. Porter, and D. L. Guernsey (2005)
Carcinogenesis
26, 1536-1541
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- The Role of Base Excision Repair in the Sensitivity and Resistance to Temozolomide-Mediated Cell Death.
- R. N. Trivedi, K. H. Almeida, J. L. Fornsaglio, S. Schamus, and R. W. Sobol (2005)
Cancer Res.
65, 6394-6400
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Genetic Variants of DNA Repair Genes and Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.
- J. D. Ritchey, W.-Y. Huang, A. P. Chokkalingam, Y.-T. Gao, J. Deng, P. Levine, F. Z. Stanczyk, and A. W. Hsing (2005)
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
14, 1703-1709
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Oxidative Damage and Defective DNA Repair is Linked to Apoptosis of Migrating Neurons and Progenitors During Cerebral Cortex Development in Ku70-Deficient Mice.
- R. Narasimhaiah, A. Tuchman, S. L. Lin, and J. R. Naegele (2005)
Cereb Cortex
15, 696-707
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Developmental Regulation and In Vitro Culture Effects on Expression of DNA Repair and Cell Cycle Checkpoint Control Genes in Rhesus Monkey Oocytes and Embryos.
- P. Zheng, R. D. Schramm, and K. E. Latham (2005)
Biol Reprod
72, 1359-1369
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Mismatch Repair System and Aging: Microsatellite Instability in Peripheral Blood Cells From Differently Aged Participants.
- S. Neri, A. Gardini, A. Facchini, F. Olivieri, C. Franceschi, G. Ravaglia, and E. Mariani (2005)
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
60, 285-292
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Tumor Suppressor APC Blocks DNA Polymerase {beta}-dependent Strand Displacement Synthesis during Long Patch but Not Short Patch Base Excision Repair and Increases Sensitivity to Methylmethane Sulfonate.
- S. Narayan, A. S. Jaiswal, and R. Balusu (2005)
J. Biol. Chem.
280, 6942-6949
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in colorectal cancer: preclinical data and therapeutic perspectives.
- J. P. Spano, R. Fagard, J.-C. Soria, O. Rixe, D. Khayat, and G. Milano (2005)
Ann. Onc.
16, 189-194
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Polymorphisms in DNA Base Excision Repair Genes ADPRT and XRCC1 and Risk of Lung Cancer.
- X. Zhang, X. Miao, G. Liang, B. Hao, Y. Wang, W. Tan, Y. Li, Y. Guo, F. He, Q. Wei, et al. (2005)
Cancer Res.
65, 722-726
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Specific combinations of DNA repair gene variants and increased risk for non-small cell lung cancer.
- O. Popanda, T. Schattenberg, C. T. Phong, D. Butkiewicz, A. Risch, L. Edler, K. Kayser, H. Dienemann, V. Schulz, P. Drings, et al. (2004)
Carcinogenesis
25, 2433-2441
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- UV Light-induced DNA Damage and Tolerance for the Survival of Nucleotide Excision Repair-deficient Human Cells.
- S. Nakajima, L. Lan, S.-i. Kanno, M. Takao, K. Yamamoto, A. P. M. Eker, and A. Yasui (2004)
J. Biol. Chem.
279, 46674-46677
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Irofulven Cytotoxicity Depends on Transcription-Coupled Nucleotide Excision Repair and Is Correlated with XPG Expression in Solid Tumor Cells.
- F. Koeppel, V. Poindessous, V. Lazar, E. Raymond, A. Sarasin, and A. K. Larsen (2004)
Clin. Cancer Res.
10, 5604-5613
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Gene Expression Analysis of Tumor Spheroids Reveals a Role for Suppressed DNA Mismatch Repair in Multicellular Resistance to Alkylating Agents.
- G. Francia, S. Man, B. Teicher, L. Grasso, and R. S. Kerbel (2004)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
24, 6837-6849
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Human Nucleotide Excision Repair Efficiently Removes Chromium-DNA Phosphate Adducts and Protects Cells against Chromate Toxicity.
- M. Reynolds, E. Peterson, G. Quievryn, and A. Zhitkovich (2004)
J. Biol. Chem.
279, 30419-30424
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Identification of Genetic Variants in Base Excision Repair Pathway and Their Associations with Risk of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
- B. Hao, H. Wang, K. Zhou, Y. Li, X. Chen, G. Zhou, Y. Zhu, X. Miao, W. Tan, Q. Wei, et al. (2004)
Cancer Res.
64, 4378-4384
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Involvement of base excision repair in response to therapy targeted at thymidylate synthase.
- L. Li, S. H. Berger, and M. D. Wyatt (2004)
Mol. Cancer Ther.
3, 747-753
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- High Specificity of Quantitative Excision Repair Cross-Complementing 1 Messenger RNA Expression for Prediction of Minor Histopathological Response to Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer.
- U. Warnecke-Eberz, R. Metzger, F. Miyazono, S. E. Baldus, S. Neiss, J. Brabender, H. Schaefer, W. Doerfler, E. Bollschweiler, H. P. Dienes, et al. (2004)
Clin. Cancer Res.
10, 3794-3799
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- DNA repair in higher plants; photoreactivation is the major DNA repair pathway in non-proliferating cells while excision repair (nucleotide excision repair and base excision repair) is active in proliferating cells.
- S. Kimura, Y. Tahira, T. Ishibashi, Y. Mori, T. Mori, J. Hashimoto, and K. Sakaguchi (2004)
Nucleic Acids Res.
32, 2760-2767
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- A Large-Scale Screen for Mutagen-Sensitive Loci in Drosophila.
- A. Laurencon, C. M. Orme, H. K. Peters, C. L. Boulton, E. K. Vladar, S. A. Langley, E. P. Bakis, D. T. Harris, N. J. Harris, S. M. Wayson, et al. (2004)
Genetics
167, 217-231
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Polymorphisms in DNA repair and metabolic genes in bladder cancer.
- S. Sanyal, F. Festa, S. Sakano, Z. Zhang, G. Steineck, U. Norming, H. Wijkstrom, P. Larsson, R. Kumar, and K. Hemminki (2004)
Carcinogenesis
25, 729-734
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Interaction of human and bacterial AlkB proteins with DNA as probed through chemical cross-linking studies.
- Y. Mishina, C.-H. J. Lee, and C. He (2004)
Nucleic Acids Res.
32, 1548-1554
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Expression of Base Excision DNA Repair Genes Is a Sensitive Biomarker for in Vivo Detection of Chemical-induced Chronic Oxidative Stress: Identification of the Molecular Source of Radicals Responsible for DNA Damage by Peroxisome Proliferators.
- I. Rusyn, S. Asakura, B. Pachkowski, B. U. Bradford, M. F. Denissenko, J. M. Peters, S. M. Holland, J. K. Reddy, M. L. Cunningham, and J. A. Swenberg (2004)
Cancer Res.
64, 1050-1057
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Deficient Nucleotide Excision Repair Capacity Enhances Human Prostate Cancer Risk.
- J. J. Hu, M. C. Hall, L. Grossman, M. Hedayati, D. L. McCullough, K. Lohman, and L. D. Case (2004)
Cancer Res.
64, 1197-1201
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- DNA Repair Gene XRCC1 and XPD Polymorphisms and Risk of Prostate Cancer.
- B. A. Rybicki, D. V. Conti, A. Moreira, M. Cicek, G. Casey, and J. S. Witte (2004)
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
13, 23-29
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Genetic Variation and Exposure Related Risk Estimation: Will Toxicology Enter a New Era? DNA Repair and Cancer as a Paradigm.
- H. W. Mohrenweiser (2004)
Toxicol Pathol
32, 136-145
| Abstract »
| PDF »
- MSH2 and ATR form a signaling module and regulate two branches of the damage response to DNA methylation.
- Y. Wang and J. Qin (2003)
PNAS
100, 15387-15392
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- p53 Mutations in Bladder Cancer: Evidence for Exogenous versus Endogenous Risk Factors.
- J. C. Schroeder, K. Conway, Y. Li, K. Mistry, D. A. Bell, and J. A. Taylor (2003)
Cancer Res.
63, 7530-7538
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Exposing the MYtH about base excision repair and human inherited disease.
- J. P. Cheadle and J. R. Sampson (2003)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
12, R159-R165
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Base Excision Repair Intermediates Induce p53-independent Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Responses.
- R. W. Sobol, M. Kartalou, K. H. Almeida, D. F. Joyce, B. P. Engelward, J. K. Horton, R. Prasad, L. D. Samson, and S. H. Wilson (2003)
J. Biol. Chem.
278, 39951-39959
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
- Relationship between XPG codon 1104 polymorphism and risk of primary lung cancer.
- H.-S. Jeon, K. M. Kim, S. H. Park, S. Y. Lee, J. E. Choi, G. Y. Lee, S. Kam, R. W. Park, I.-S. Kim, C. H. Kim, et al. (2003)
Carcinogenesis
24, 1677-1681
| Abstract »
| Full Text »
| PDF »
|
|