Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Sci. Signal., 17 April 2012
Vol. 5, Issue 220, p. re1
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2002961]


Computational Approaches for Analyzing Information Flow in Biological Networks

Boris Kholodenko1, Michael B. Yaffe2, and Walter Kolch1,3*

1 Systems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
2 Departments of Biology and Biological Engineering, David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, 76-353, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
3 Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Gloss: How do cells perceive their environment and produce appropriate responses? The sensing and coordination of proper responses is coordinated by intricate biochemical networks that integrate signals and compute biological responses with high fidelity and reproducibility. Modern "omics" (proteomics, genomics, lipidomics, and metabolomics) techniques have identified many of the components of these networks, but researchers are now faced with the challenge of unraveling how the components are connected and how they compute. To elucidate these network properties, various mathematical and computational modeling techniques are used because their complexity defeats human intuition. The results indicate that signaling networks show a wide diversity of behaviors encoded in their design, but that they are also very flexible, with cells adapting their networks in response to different contexts by changing connectivities. The remaining challenges include integration of data generated with methods for the analysis of different types of networks (gene regulation, protein modification, and metabolic networks), and generation of coherent network interpretations that are widely accessible and can generate new hypotheses that are experimentally testable and that will push the knowledge frontier in biology and biomedicine.

* Corresponding author. E-mail: walter.kolch{at}

Citation: B. Kholodenko, M. B. Yaffe, W. Kolch, Computational Approaches for Analyzing Information Flow in Biological Networks. Sci. Signal. 5, re1 (2012).

Network quantification of EGFR signaling unveils potential for targeted combination therapy.
B. Klinger, A. Sieber, R. Fritsche-Guenther, F. Witzel, L. Berry, D. Schumacher, Y. Yan, P. Durek, M. Merchant, R. Schafer, et al. (2014)
Mol Syst Biol 9, 673
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Computational Modeling of ERBB2-Amplified Breast Cancer Identifies Combined ErbB2/3 Blockade as Superior to the Combination of MEK and AKT Inhibitors.
D. C. Kirouac, J. Y. Du, J. Lahdenranta, R. Overland, D. Yarar, V. Paragas, E. Pace, C. F. McDonagh, U. B. Nielsen, and M. D. Onsum (2013)
Science Signaling 6, ra68
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Automatic Generation of Predictive Dynamic Models Reveals Nuclear Phosphorylation as the Key Msn2 Control Mechanism.
M. Sunnaker, E. Zamora-Sillero, R. Dechant, C. Ludwig, A. G. Busetto, A. Wagner, and J. Stelling (2013)
Science Signaling 6, ra41
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Hypoxia induces a phase transition within a kinase signaling network in cancer cells.
W. Wei, Q. Shi, F. Remacle, L. Qin, D. B. Shackelford, Y. S. Shin, P. S. Mischel, R. D. Levine, and J. R. Heath (2013)
PNAS 110, E1352-E1360
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Modeling Regulatory Networks to Understand Plant Development: Small Is Beautiful.
A. M. Middleton, E. Farcot, M. R. Owen, and T. Vernoux (2012)
PLANT CELL 24, 3876-3891
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »

To Advertise     Find Products

Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882