Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Subscribe

Sci. STKE, 3 September 2002
Vol. 2002, Issue 148, p. re12
[DOI: 10.1126/stke.2002.148.re12]

REVIEWS

Modeling the Cell's Guidance System

Pablo A. Iglesias1 and Andre Levchenko2*

1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 105 Barton Hall, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
2The Whitaker Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 208C Clark Hall, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Gloss: Chemotaxis, or directed cell motility, is a striking example of a complex and robust behavior exhibited with exquisite precision by single cells. Chemotaxis has long attracted the attention of mathematical and computational biologists. Recent advances in experimental techniques have led to an explosive growth in the accumulated data related to the biochemical nature of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic chemotaxis, which allowed investigators, for the first time, to glimpse the mechanism of the cell's guidance system. Several computational models of eukaryotic gradient sensing, a central part of chemotaxis, have appeared recently that suggest different underlying mechanisms. This review attempts to analyze the merits and deficiencies of each model in the context of the control of eukaryotic chemotactic behavior. The idea of modular organization of different control mechanisms underlying chemotaxis is also proposed.

*Corresponding author. E-mail: alev{at}bme.jhu.edu

Citation: P. A. Iglesias, A. Levchenko, Modeling the Cell's Guidance System. Sci. STKE 2002, re12 (2002).


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Adaptive molecular networks controlling chemotactic migration: dynamic inputs and selection of the network architecture.
H. Chang and A. Levchenko (2013)
Phil Trans R Soc B 368, 20130117
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Chemoattractant Signaling in Dictyostelium: Adaptation and Amplification.
P. A. Iglesias (2012)
Science Signaling 5, pe8
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Diverse Sensitivity Thresholds in Dynamic Signaling Responses by Social Amoebae.
C. J. Wang, A. Bergmann, B. Lin, K. Kim, and A. Levchenko (2012)
Science Signaling 5, ra17
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Coupling Mechanism of a GPCR and a Heterotrimeric G Protein During Chemoattractant Gradient Sensing in Dictyostelium.
X. Xu, T. Meckel, J. A. Brzostowski, J. Yan, M. Meier-Schellersheim, and T. Jin (2010)
Science Signaling 3, ra71
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Local Excitation, Global Inhibition Mechanism for Gradient Sensing: An Interactive Applet.
B. Kutscher, P. Devreotes, and P. A. Iglesias (2004)
Sci. STKE 2004, pl3
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »

To Advertise     Find Products


Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882