Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Sci. Signal., 30 March 2010
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2000616]

Supplementary Materials for:

New Roles for the LKB1-NUAK Pathway in Controlling Myosin Phosphatase Complexes and Cell Adhesion

Anna Zagórska,* Maria Deak, David G. Campbell, Sourav Banerjee, Mariko Hirano, Shinichi Aizawa, Alan R. Prescott, Dario R. Alessi*

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: azagorska{at} (A.Z.); d.r.alessi{at} (D.R.A.)

This PDF file includes:

  • Materials and Methods
  • Fig. S1. Overexpressed NUAK1 and NUAK2 interact with endogenous MYPT1- PP1β complex.
  • Fig. S2. Identification of a small region in NUAK1 containing the GILK motif that binds to the MYPT1-PP1β complex.
  • Fig. S3. Alignment of GILK motifs in vertebrate orthologues of NUAK1 and NUAK2 and C. elegans UNC-82.
  • Fig. S4. Endogenous AMPKα1 and AMPKα2 do not immunoprecipitate the MYPT1-PP1β complex.
  • Fig. S5. Further characterization of binding of NUAK1 to PP1β.
  • Fig. S6. NUAK1 coimmunoprecipitating with MYPT1 is phosphorylated at its T loop.
  • Fig. S7. Sequence alignment of NUAK1 phosphorylation sites on MYPT1.
  • Fig. S8. Phosphorylation of the MYPT1-PP1β complex by NUAK1.
  • Fig. S9. Effect of the NUAK1 inhibitor BX795 and NUAK1 shRNA on cell detachment.
  • Fig. S10. Effect of different substrata on cell detachment.
  • Fig. S11. Localization of F-actin and MLC2 during detachment of Lkb1+/+ or Lkb1–/– MEFs.
  • Fig. S12. Localization of F-actin and MLC2 during detachment of Nuak1+/+ or Nuak1–/– MEFs.
  • Fig. S13. Localization of F-actin and MLC2 during detachment of HEK293 cells treated with BX795.
  • Fig. S14. Inhibition of LKB1-NUAK1 signaling increases number of focal adhesions, stress fibers, and cell area in MEFs.
  • Fig. S15. Basal MLC2 phosphorylation in LKB1- or NUAK1-deficient cells.
  • Fig. S16. Comparison of the phosphorylation of MYPT1 by ROCK, NUAK1, AMPK, BRSK1, or MARK2.
  • Fig. S17. Analysis of the NUAK2 K503R mutant.
  • Fig. S18. Analysis of the NUAK1 interaction with PP1-targeting subunits.
  • Fig. S19. The effect of the NUAK1 inhibitor BX795 and the ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 on phosphorylation of MYPT1.
  • Fig. S20. Cell dissociation does not affect NUAK1 activity.
  • Table S1. Proteins identified by mass spectrometry in NUAK1 immunoprecipitates.
  • References

[Download PDF]

Technical Details

Format: Adobe Acrobat PDF

Size: 6.0 MB

Citation: A.Zagórska, M. Deak, D. G. Campbell, S. Banerjee, M. Hirano, S. Aizawa, A. R. Prescott, D. R. Alessi, New Roles for the LKB1-NUAK Pathway in Controlling Myosin Phosphatase Complexes and Cell Adhesion. Sci. Signal. 3, ra25 (2010).

© 2010 American Association for the Advancement of Science

To Advertise     Find Products

Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882