Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Sci. Signal., 17 April 2012
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2002657]

Supplementary Materials for:

Quantifying Crosstalk Among Interferon-γ, Interleukin-12, and Tumor Necrosis Factor Signaling Pathways Within a TH1 Cell Model

David J. Klinke II,* Ning Cheng, Emily Chambers

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: david.klinke{at}mail.wvu.edu

This PDF file includes:

  • Section 1. Models and modeling.
  • Section 2. Model parameters.
  • Fig. S1. Convergence of AMCMC results for the cell fate model.
  • Fig. S2. AMCMC summary plots for each of the cell fate model parameters.
  • Fig. S3. Pairwise comparison of posterior distribution in cell fate rate parameters.
  • Fig. S4. Calibration of the cell fate model.
  • Fig. S5. The balance between proliferative and apoptotic cell fates depends on time and culture conditions.
  • Fig. S6. IL-12 phosphorylates STAT4 in a graded dose-dependent manner in 2D6 cells.
  • Fig. S7. Copy number estimation for IL-12Rβ1, IL-12Rβ2, STAT1, and STAT4 in 2D6 cells.
  • Fig. S8. Calibration of the cue-signal-response model.
  • Fig. S9. IL-12Rβ1 and IL-12Rβ2 exhibited similar dynamics, whereas MCP-1 and IL-6 were unchanged across experimental conditions.
  • Fig. S10. 2D6 cells have IFN-γ and TNF-α receptors.
  • Fig. S11. Convergence of AMCMC results for the cue-signal-response model.
  • Fig. S12. AMCMC summary plots for each of the cue-signal-response model parameters.
  • Fig. S13. Pairwise comparison of posterior distribution in rate parameters associated with the cue-signal-response model.
  • Fig. S14. Posterior distributions in the rate constants associated with the decline in the amount of pSTAT4.
  • Fig. S15. STAT4 and STAT1 are phosphorylated in response to IL-12.
  • Fig. S16. IL-12 and IFN-γ phosphorylate STAT1 in primary cells.
  • Fig. S17. IL-12 binding enhanced a reduction in the amount of IL-12R.
  • Table S1. Values for the cell fate model parameters and initial conditions.
  • Table S2. List of cue-signal-response model variables and initial conditions.
  • Table S3. Reaction rate laws for the cue-signal-response model.
  • Table S4. Differential equations that define the cue-signal-response model.
  • Table S5. List of cue-signal-response model parameters and corresponding values.
  • References

[Download PDF]

Technical Details

Format: Adobe Acrobat PDF

Size: 5.78 MB


Citation: D. J. Klinke II, N. Cheng, E. Chambers, Quantifying Crosstalk Among Interferon-γ, Interleukin-12, and Tumor Necrosis Factor Signaling Pathways Within a TH1 Cell Model. Sci. Signal. 5, ra32 (2012).

© 2012 American Association for the Advancement of Science


To Advertise     Find Products


Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882