Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Sci. Signal., 21 June 2011
Vol. 4, Issue 178, p. rs4
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2001484]
RESEARCH RESOURCES
Editor's Summary
SUMO and the Proteasome
Members of the family of ubiquitin-like posttranslational protein modifiers, such as small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMOs), share structural similarity with ubiquitin and form conjugates with target proteins to regulate many eukaryotic cellular functions. Noting that inhibition of the proteasome results in the accumulation of SUMO-conjugated proteins, Tatham et al. used mass spectrometric analysis of purified proteins to perform a system-wide analysis of protein SUMOylation in HeLa cells exposed to the proteasomal inhibitor MG132. Changes in SUMOylation were similar to those known to be triggered by heat stress and seemed to be secondary to the accumulation of misfolded proteins. In addition, SUMO-2 and ubiquitin were exchanged among substrates during proteasome inhibition. Together, these findings suggest SUMO proteins are involved in the response to the accumulation of misfolded proteins in cells.
Citation: M. H. Tatham, I. Matic, M. Mann, R. T. Hay, Comparative Proteomic Analysis Identifies a Role for SUMO in Protein Quality Control. Sci. Signal.4, rs4 (2011).
The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Signaling
RESEARCH ARTICLES
Filip Golebiowski, Ivan Matic, Michael H. Tatham, Christian Cole, Yili Yin, Akihiro Nakamura, Jürgen Cox, Geoffrey J. Barton, Matthias Mann, and Ronald T. Hay (26 May 2009) Sci. Signal.2 (72), ra24.
[DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2000282] |Editor's Summary »|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »|Supplementary Materials »
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
RSUME Enhances Glucocorticoid Receptor SUMOylation and Transcriptional Activity.
J. Druker, A. C. Liberman, M. Antunica-Noguerol, J. Gerez, M. Paez-Pereda, T. Rein, J. A. Iniguez-Lluhi, F. Holsboer, and E. Arzt (2013)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
33, 2116-2127
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Global Subcellular Characterization of Protein Degradation Using Quantitative Proteomics.
M. Larance, Y. Ahmad, K. J. Kirkwood, T. Ly, and A. I. Lamond (2013)
Mol. Cell. Proteomics
12, 638-650
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Factors Regulating RNA Biology as Dynamic Targets of Stress-induced SUMOylation in Arabidopsis.
M. J. Miller, M. Scalf, T. C. Rytz, S. L. Hubler, L. M. Smith, and R. D. Vierstra (2013)
Mol. Cell. Proteomics
12, 449-463
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
A Novel SUMO1-specific Interacting Motif in Dipeptidyl Peptidase 9 (DPP9) That Is Important for Enzymatic Regulation.
E. Pilla, U. Moller, G. Sauer, F. Mattiroli, F. Melchior, and R. Geiss-Friedlander (2012)
J. Biol. Chem.
287, 44320-44329
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
In vivo localization and identification of SUMOylated proteins in the brain of His6-HA-SUMO1 knock-in mice.
M. Tirard, H.-H. Hsiao, M. Nikolov, H. Urlaub, F. Melchior, and N. Brose (2012)
PNAS
109, 21122-21127
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
RNF4-Dependent Hybrid SUMO-Ubiquitin Chains Are Signals for RAP80 and Thereby Mediate the Recruitment of BRCA1 to Sites of DNA Damage.
C. M. Guzzo, C. E. Berndsen, J. Zhu, V. Gupta, A. Datta, R. A. Greenberg, C. Wolberger, and M. J. Matunis (2012)
Science Signaling
5, ra88
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
Dynamic SUMOylation Is Linked to the Activity Cycles of Androgen Receptor in the Cell Nucleus.
M. Rytinki, S. Kaikkonen, P. Sutinen, V. Paakinaho, V. Rahkama, and J. J. Palvimo (2012)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
32, 4195-4205
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »
The Expanding Universe of Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-Like Modifiers.
R. D. Vierstra (2012)
Plant Physiology
160, 2-14
|Full Text »|PDF »
Post-translational modification of cardiac proteasomes: functional delineation enabled by proteomics.
S. B. Scruggs, N. C. Zong, D. Wang, E. Stefani, and P. Ping (2012)
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
303, H9-H18
|Abstract »|Full Text »|PDF »