Cell Type–Specific Importance of Ras–c-Raf Complex Association Rate Constants for MAPK Signaling

Sci. Signal., 28 July 2009
Vol. 2, Issue 81, p. ra38
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2000397

Cell Type–Specific Importance of Ras–c-Raf Complex Association Rate Constants for MAPK Signaling

  1. Christina Kiel1,* and
  2. Luis Serrano1,2
  1. 1European Molecular Biology Laboratory–Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Systems Biology Unit, University Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
  2. 2Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain.
  1. *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: christina.kiel{at}crg.es

Abstract

We generated 17 c-Raf (RAF proto-oncogene serine-threonine protein kinase) mutants with altered Ras-Raf association and dissociation rates to investigate the role of electrostatically driven Ras-Raf association rates on epidermal growth factor (EGF)–activated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction. Some of these mutants had compensating changes in association and dissociation rates, enabling the effects of changes in association rate to be distinguished from those of changes in affinity. In rabbit kidney (RK13) cells, these mutants affected downstream signaling, with changes in Ras–c-Raf association rates having a greater effect on MAPK signaling than did similar changes in dissociation rates. Mutants with compensating decreases in both association and dissociation rates stimulated less extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)–dependent reporter activity than did wild-type c-Raf, whereas the converse was true for mutants with increased association and dissociation rates. In marked contrast, the mutants had little or no effect on signaling in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. These two cell lines also showed distinct patterns of EGF-dependent ERK phosphorylation and signaling: ERK activation and signaling were transient in HEK293 cells and sustained in RK13 cells, with the difference resulting from the lack of negative feedback from ERK to Sos (Son of Sevenless) in the latter. Computer simulation revealed that, in the presence of negative feedback, changes in the rate of Ras–c-Raf binding have little effect on ERK activation. Thus, EGF-MAPK activation kinetics and feedback regulation is cell type specific and depends on the network topology.

Citation:

C. Kiel and L. Serrano, Cell Type–Specific Importance of Ras–c-Raf Complex Association Rate Constants for MAPK Signaling. Sci. Signal. 2, ra38 (2009).

Structure-energy-based predictions and network modelling of RASopathy and cancer missense mutations
C. Kiel, and L. Serrano
Mol Syst Biol 10, 727-727 (28 May 2014)

Integration of Protein Abundance and Structure Data Reveals Competition in the ErbB Signaling Network
C. Kiel, E. Verschueren, J.-S. Yang, and L. Serrano
Sci Signal 6, ra109-ra109 (17 December 2013)

Understanding cancer mechanisms through network dynamics
T. M. K. Cheng, S. Gulati, R. Agius, and P. A. Bates
Briefings in Functional Genomics 11, 543-560 (1 November 2012)

Kinetics in Signal Transduction Pathways Involving Promiscuous Oligomerizing Receptors Can Be Determined by Receptor Specificity: Apoptosis Induction by TRAIL
E. Szegezdi, A. M. van der Sloot, D. Mahalingam, L. O'Leary, R. H. Cool, I. G. Munoz, G. Montoya, W. J. Quax, S. de Jong, A. Samali et al.
MCP 11, M111.013730-M111.013730 (1 March 2012)

Raf Family Kinases: Old Dogs Have Learned New Tricks
D. Matallanas, M. Birtwistle, D. Romano, A. Zebisch, J. Rauch, A. von Kriegsheim, and W. Kolch
Genes & Cancer 2, 232-260 (1 March 2011)

Multiple Decisive Phosphorylation Sites for the Negative Feedback Regulation of SOS1 via ERK
Y. Kamioka, S. Yasuda, Y. Fujita, K. Aoki, and M. Matsuda
J Biol Chem 285, 33540-33548 (22 October 2010)

Impaired Binding of 14-3-3 to C-RAF in Noonan Syndrome Suggests New Approaches in Diseases with Increased Ras Signaling
M. Molzan, B. Schumacher, C. Ottmann, A. Baljuls, L. Polzien, M. Weyand, P. Thiel, R. Rose, M. Rose, P. Kuhenne et al.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 4698-4711 (1 October 2010)

Building blocks for protein interaction devices
R. Grunberg, T. S. Ferrar, A. M. van der Sloot, M. Constante, and L. Serrano
Nucleic Acids Res 38, 2645-2662 (1 May 2010)

Inferring signaling pathway topologies from multiple perturbation measurements of specific biochemical species.
T.-R. Xu, V. Vyshemirsky, A. Gormand, A. von Kriegsheim, M. Girolami, G. S. Baillie, D. Ketley, A. J. Dunlop, G. Milligan, M. D. Houslay et al.
Sci Signal 3, ra20-ra20 (1 January 2010)

Improved Binding of Raf to Ras{middle dot}GDP Is Correlated with Biological Activity
C. Kiel, D. Filchtinski, M. Spoerner, G. Schreiber, H. R. Kalbitzer, and C. Herrmann
J Biol Chem 284, 31893-31902 (13 November 2009)

Science Signaling Podcast: 28 July 2009
M. B. Yaffe, and A. M. VanHook
Sci Signal 2, pc14-pc14 (28 July 2009)

Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882