Crossing Smads

Sci. STKE, 14 March 2000
Vol. 2000, Issue 23, p. re1
DOI: 10.1126/stke.2000.23.re1

Crossing Smads

  1. Jeffrey L. Wrana
  1. Program in Molecular Biology and Cancer, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Department of Medical Genetics and Microbiology, University of Toronto, Canada. E-mail: wrana{at}mshri.on.ca

Abstract

The transforming growth factor–β (TGF-β) superfamily of secreted polypeptide growth factors exerts extensive control over all aspects of development and homeostasis, and components of this pathway are often mutated in cancers and in several hereditary disorders. Apart from TGF-β, the superfamily also includes the activins and the bone morphogenetic proteins. These factors signal through heteromeric complexes of type II and type I serine-threonine kinase receptors, which activate the downstream Smad signal transduction pathway. Three classes of Smads have been defined: the receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads), the common-mediator Smads (co-Smads), and the antagonistic or inhibitory Smads (I-Smads). Receptor complexes activate the Smad pathway by interacting and phosphorylating specific R-Smads. Phosphorylation of the R-Smads causes dissociation from the receptor and induces assembly into complexes with Smad4, a co-Smad. This heteromeric complex then translocates into the nucleus, where the Smads function as transcriptional comodulators by recruiting coactivators or corepressors to Smad DNA binding partners. Thus, Smads transmit signals directly from the receptor kinase into the nucleus. Crosstalk between Smads and other signaling pathways occurs both in the cytosol and in the nucleus. In the cytosol, Smad translocation might be inhibited by mitogen-activated protein kinase–dependent phosphorylation, whereas in the nucleus Smads interact with a number of transcription factors that themselves are primary targets of other signaling pathways. Furthermore, Smad-dependent regulation of these targets often requires input from the primary signaling pathway. In these examples, Smad signaling may represent a secondary signal that modifies the output of the primary pathway. Consequently, the transcriptional response to TGF-β family ligands may be dependent on what other signals are being received by the cell. Crosstalk may thus provide one explanation for the long-standing observation that the biological response to TGF-β is often dependent on the extracellular environment of the cell.

Citation:

J. L. Wrana, Crossing Smads. Sci. STKE 2000, re1 (2000).

Arrestins function in cAR1 GPCR-mediated signaling and cAR1 internalization in the development of Dictyostelium discoideum
X. Cao, J. Yan, S. Shu, J. A. Brzostowski, and T. Jin
Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 3210-3221 (15 October 2014)

ERK5 Activation in Macrophages Promotes Efferocytosis and Inhibits Atherosclerosis
K.-S. Heo, H. J. Cushman, M. Akaike, C.-H. Woo, X. Wang, X. Qiu, K. Fujiwara, and J.-i. Abe
Circulation 130, 180-191 (8 July 2014)

20-HETE induces remodeling of renal resistance arteries independent of blood pressure elevation in hypertension
Y. Ding, C.-C. Wu, V. Garcia, I. Dimitrova, A. Weidenhammer, G. Joseph, F. Zhang, V. L. Manthati, J. R. Falck, J. H. Capdevila et al.
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 305, F753-F763 (1 September 2013)

Involvement of p300/CBP and epigenetic histone acetylation in TGF-{beta}1-mediated gene transcription in mesangial cells
H. Yuan, M. A. Reddy, G. Sun, L. Lanting, M. Wang, M. Kato, and R. Natarajan
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 304, F601-F613 (1 March 2013)

Autophagy Regulates IL-23 Secretion and Innate T Cell Responses through Effects on IL-1 Secretion
C. Peral de Castro, S. A. Jones, C. Ni Cheallaigh, C. A. Hearnden, L. Williams, J. Winter, E. C. Lavelle, K. H. G. Mills, and J. Harris
J. Immunol. 189, 4144-4153 (15 October 2012)

Lipid Signaling in T-Cell Development and Function
Y. H. Huang, and K. Sauer
Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a002428-a002428 (1 November 2010)

Extracellular Heat Shock Protein 60, Cardiac Myocytes, and Apoptosis
S.-C. Kim, J. P. Stice, L. Chen, J. S. Jung, S. Gupta, Y. Wang, G. Baumgarten, J. Trial, and A. A. Knowlton
Circ. Res. 105, 1186-1195 (4 December 2009)

Design Logic of a Cannabinoid Receptor Signaling Network That Triggers Neurite Outgrowth
K. D. Bromberg, A. Ma'ayan, S. R. Neves, and R. Iyengar
Science 320, 903-909 (16 May 2008)

Mechanism of IL-1{beta}-Induced Increase in Intestinal Epithelial Tight Junction Permeability
R. Al-Sadi, D. Ye, K. Dokladny, and T. Y. Ma
J. Immunol. 180, 5653-5661 (15 April 2008)

SNAP25, but Not Syntaxin 1A, Recycles via an ARF6-regulated Pathway in Neuroendocrine Cells
Y. Aikawa, X. Xia, and T. F.J. Martin
Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 711-722 (1 February 2006)

Natural Killer Cell Signaling Pathways
E. Vivier, J. A. Nunes, and F. Vely
Science 306, 1517-1519 (26 November 2004)

Human RAS Superfamily Proteins and Related GTPases
J. Colicelli, J. A. Nunes, and F. Vely
Sci Signal 2004, re13-re13 (14 September 2004)

Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882