Rules for Modeling Signal-Transduction Systems

This article has a correction Sci. STKE 2006(345):er7

Sci. STKE, 18 July 2006
Vol. 2006, Issue 344, p. re6
DOI: 10.1126/stke.3442006re6

Rules for Modeling Signal-Transduction Systems

  1. William S. Hlavacek1,*,
  2. James R. Faeder2,
  3. Michael L. Blinov3,
  4. Richard G. Posner4,
  5. Michael Hucka5, and
  6. Walter Fontana6
  1. 1Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
  2. 2Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
  3. 3Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
  4. 4Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
  5. 5Control and Dynamical Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
  6. 6Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  1. *Corresponding author. E-mail, wish{at}lanl.gov

Abstract

Formalized rules for protein-protein interactions have recently been introduced to represent the binding and enzymatic activities of proteins in cellular signaling. Rules encode an understanding of how a system works in terms of the biomolecules in the system and their possible states and interactions. A set of rules can be as easy to read as a diagrammatic interaction map, but unlike most such maps, rules have precise interpretations. Rules can be processed to automatically generate a mathematical or computational model for a system, which enables explanatory and predictive insights into the system’s behavior. Rules are independent units of a model specification that facilitate model revision. Instead of changing a large number of equations or lines of code, as may be required in the case of a conventional mathematical model, a protein interaction can be introduced or modified simply by adding or changing a single rule that represents the interaction of interest. Rules can be defined and visualized by using graphs, so no specialized training in mathematics or computer science is necessary to create models or to take advantage of the representational precision of rules. Rules can be encoded in a machine-readable format to enable electronic storage and exchange of models, as well as basic knowledge about protein-protein interactions. Here, we review the motivation for rule-based modeling; applications of the approach; and issues that arise in model specification, simulation, and testing. We also discuss rule visualization and exchange and the software available for rule-based modeling.

Citation:

W. S. Hlavacek, J. R. Faeder, M. L. Blinov, R. G. Posner, M. Hucka, and W. Fontana, Rules for Modeling Signal-Transduction Systems. Sci. STKE 2006, re6 (2006).

Tandem phosphorylation within an intrinsically disordered region regulates ACTN4 function
T. Travers, H. Shao, B. A. Joughin, D. A. Lauffenburger, A. Wells, and C. J. Camacho
Sci Signal 8, ra51-ra51 (26 May 2015)

Systems-level interactions between insulin-EGF networks amplify mitogenic signaling
N. Borisov, E. Aksamitiene, A. Kiyatkin, S. Legewie, J. Berkhout, T. Maiwald, N. P. Kaimachnikov, J. Timmer, J. B. Hoek, B. N. Kholodenko et al.
Mol Syst Biol 5, 256-256 (28 July 2014)

How to deal with large models?
W. S. Hlavacek, E. Aksamitiene, A. Kiyatkin, S. Legewie, J. Berkhout, T. Maiwald, N. P. Kaimachnikov, J. Timmer, J. B. Hoek, B. N. Kholodenko et al.
Mol Syst Biol 5, 240-240 (28 July 2014)

Competing G protein-coupled receptor kinases balance G protein and {beta}-arrestin signaling
D. Heitzler, G. Durand, N. Gallay, A. Rizk, S. Ahn, J. Kim, J. D. Violin, L. Dupuy, C. Gauthier, V. Piketty et al.
Mol Syst Biol 8, 590-590 (23 July 2014)

Programming biological models in Python using PySB
C. F. Lopez, J. L. Muhlich, J. A. Bachman, and P. K. Sorger
Mol Syst Biol 9, 646-646 (21 July 2014)

Cell responses only partially shape cell-to-cell variations in protein abundances in Escherichia coli chemotaxis
S. Mukherjee, S.-C. Seok, V. J. Vieland, and J. Das
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18531-18536 (12 November 2013)

Decoding the Language of Phosphorylation Site Dynamics
L. A. Chylek, S.-C. Seok, V. J. Vieland, and J. Das
Sci Signal 6, jc2-jc2 (7 May 2013)

The Simmune Modeler visual interface for creating signaling networks based on bi-molecular interactions
F. Zhang, B. R. Angermann, and M. Meier-Schellersheim
Bioinformatics 29, 1229-1230 (1 May 2013)

A Computational Model for Early Events in B Cell Antigen Receptor Signaling: Analysis of the Roles of Lyn and Fyn
D. Barua, W. S. Hlavacek, and T. Lipniacki
J. Immunol. 189, 646-658 (15 July 2012)

Computational Approaches for Analyzing Information Flow in Biological Networks
B. Kholodenko, M. B. Yaffe, and W. Kolch
Sci Signal 5, re1-re1 (17 April 2012)

The Evolution of the Phage Shock Protein Response System: Interplay between Protein Function, Genomic Organization, and System Function
M. Huvet, T. Toni, X. Sheng, T. Thorne, G. Jovanovic, C. Engl, M. Buck, J. W. Pinney, and M. P. H. Stumpf
Mol Biol Evol 28, 1141-1155 (1 March 2011)

CplexA: a Mathematica package to study macromolecular-assembly control of gene expression
J. M. G. Vilar, and L. Saiz
Bioinformatics 26, 2060-2061 (15 August 2010)

Decoupling of Receptor and Downstream Signals in the Akt Pathway by Its Low-Pass Filter Characteristics
K. A. Fujita, Y. Toyoshima, S. Uda, Y.-i. Ozaki, H. Kubota, and S. Kuroda
Sci Signal 3, ra56-ra56 (27 July 2010)

Perspectives for Computer Modeling in the Study of T Cell Activation
J. Coward, R. N. Germain, and G. Altan-Bonnet
Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a005538-a005538 (1 June 2010)

Hematopoiesis and its disorders: a systems biology approach
Z. L. Whichard, C. A. Sarkar, M. Kimmel, and S. J. Corey
Blood 115, 2339-2347 (25 March 2010)

The Complexity of Cell Signaling and the Need for a New Mechanics
W. S. Hlavacek, and J. R. Faeder
Sci Signal 2, pe46-pe46 (28 July 2009)

Computational systems biology of the cell cycle
A. Csikasz-Nagy, and J. R. Faeder
Brief Bioinform 10, 424-434 (1 July 2009)

Science Signaling Podcast: 30 June 2009
U. B. Nielsen, and A. M. VanHook
Sci Signal 2, pc12-pc12 (30 June 2009)

GetBonNie for building, analyzing and sharing rule-based models
B. Hu, G. Matthew Fricke, J. R. Faeder, R. G. Posner, and W. S. Hlavacek
Bioinformatics 25, 1457-1460 (1 June 2009)

Simulation of large-scale rule-based models
J. Colvin, M. I. Monine, J. R. Faeder, W. S. Hlavacek, D. D. Von Hoff, and R. G. Posner
Bioinformatics 25, 910-917 (1 April 2009)

Kinetic Proofreading of Ligand-Fc{varepsilon}RI Interactions May Persist beyond LAT Phosphorylation
C. Torigoe, J. R. Faeder, J. M. Oliver, and B. Goldstein
J. Immunol. 178, 3530-3535 (15 March 2007)

Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882