Yeast Dynamically Modify Their Environment to Achieve Better Mating Efficiency

Sci. Signal., 16 August 2011
Vol. 4, Issue 186, p. ra54
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2001763

Yeast Dynamically Modify Their Environment to Achieve Better Mating Efficiency

  1. Meng Jin1,
  2. Beverly Errede1,*,
  3. Marcelo Behar2,
  4. Will Mather3,
  5. Sujata Nayak3,
  6. Jeff Hasty3,
  7. Henrik G. Dohlman1,4, and
  8. Timothy C. Elston4,*
  1. 1Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  2. 2Department of Chemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
  3. 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
  4. 4Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  1. *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: errede{at}email.unc.edu (B.E.); telston{at}med.unc.edu (T.C.E.)

Abstract

The maintenance and detection of signaling gradients are critical for proper development and cell migration. In single-cell organisms, gradient detection allows cells to orient toward a distant mating partner or nutrient source. Budding yeast expand their growth toward mating pheromone gradients through a process known as chemotropic growth. MATα cells secrete α-factor pheromone that stimulates chemotropism and mating differentiation in MATa cells and vice versa. Paradoxically, MATa cells secrete Bar1, a protease that degrades α-factor and that attenuates the mating response, yet is also required for efficient mating. We observed that MATa cells avoid each other during chemotropic growth. To explore this behavior, we developed a computational platform to simulate chemotropic growth. Our simulations indicated that the release of Bar1 enabled individual MATa cells to act as α-factor sinks. The simulations suggested that the resultant local reshaping of pheromone concentration created gradients that were directed away from neighboring MATa cells (self-avoidance) and that were increasingly amplified toward partners of the opposite sex during elongation. The behavior of Bar1-deficient cells in gradient chambers and mating assays supported these predictions from the simulations. Thus, budding yeast dynamically remodel their environment to ensure productive responses to an external stimulus and avoid nonproductive cell-cell interactions.

Citation:

M. Jin, B. Errede, M. Behar, W. Mather, S. Nayak, J. Hasty, H. G. Dohlman, and T. C. Elston, Yeast Dynamically Modify Their Environment to Achieve Better Mating Efficiency. Sci. Signal. 4, ra54 (2011).

Secreting and Sensing the Same Molecule Allows Cells to Achieve Versatile Social Behaviors
H. Youk, and W. A. Lim
Science 343, 1242782-1242782 (7 February 2014)

Genetically Engineered Transvestites Reveal Novel Mating Genes in Budding Yeast
L. B. Huberman, and A. W. Murray
Genetics 195, 1277-1290 (1 December 2013)

Decisions on the fly in cellular sensory systems
E. D. Siggia, and M. Vergassola
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E3704-E3712 (24 September 2013)

Mate and fuse: how yeast cells do it
L. Merlini, O. Dudin, and S. G. Martin
Open Biol 3, 130008-130008 (6 March 2013)

Biogenesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pheromone a-Factor, from Yeast Mating to Human Disease
S. Michaelis, and J. Barrowman
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76, 626-651 (1 September 2012)

Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882