Error message

No crossref credentials set for pnas

Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation

PNAS, 26 April 2005
Vol. 102, Issue 17, p. 5953-5957
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407356102

Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation

  1. Benjamin G. Keselowsky*,
  2. David M. Collard, and
  3. Andrés J. García*§
  1. *Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, and School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332
  1. Edited by Sheldon Weinbaum, City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, and approved March 17, 2005 (received for review October 4, 2004)

Abstract

Biomaterial surface chemistry has profound consequences on cellular and host responses, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Using self-assembled monolayers as model biomaterial surfaces presenting well defined chemistries, we demonstrate that surface chemistry modulates osteoblastic differentiation and matrix mineralization independently from alterations in cell proliferation. Surfaces were precoated with equal densities of fibronectin (FN), and surface chemistry modulated FN structure to alter integrin adhesion receptor binding. OH- and NH2-terminated surfaces up-regulated osteoblast-specific gene expression, alkaline phosphatase enzymatic activity, and matrix mineralization compared with surfaces presenting COOH and CH3 groups. These surface chemistry-dependent differences in cell differentiation were controlled by binding of specific integrins to adsorbed FN. Function-perturbing antibodies against the central cell binding domain of FN completely inhibited matrix mineralization. Furthermore, blocking antibodies against β1 integrin inhibited matrix mineralization on the OH and NH2 surfaces, whereas function-perturbing antibodies specific for β3 integrin increased mineralization on the COOH substrate. These results establish surface-dependent differences in integrin binding as a mechanism regulating differential cellular responses to biomaterial surfaces. This mechanism could be exploited to engineer materials that control integrin binding specificity to elicit desired cellular activities to enhance the integration of biomaterials and improve the performance of biotechnological culture supports.

  • cell adhesion
  • signaling
  • osteoblast
  • mineralization

Footnotes

    • § To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 315 Ferst Drive, Room 2314 IBB, Atlanta, GA 30332-0363. E-mail: andres.garcia{at}me.gatech.edu.

    • Author contributions: D.M.C. and A.J.G. designed research; B.G.K. performed research; D.M.C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; B.G.K. and A.J.G. analyzed data; and B.G.K. and A.J.G. wrote the paper.

    • This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

    • Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; FTIR, Fourier transform infrared; FN, fibronectin; SAM, self-assembled monolayer.

    • Received October 4, 2004.

    Citation:

    B. G. Keselowsky, D. M. Collard, and A. J. García, Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation. PNAS 102, 5953-5957 (2005).

    Bioactive organic-inorganic poly(CLMA-co-HEA)/silica nanocomposites
    S. Ivashchenko, J. L. Escobar Ivirico, D. M. Garcia Cruz, A. Campillo-Fernandez, G. G. Ferrer, and M. M. Pradas
    J Biomater Appl 29, 1096-1108 (1 March 2015)

    Gene expression profiling and mechanism study of neural stem cells response to surface chemistry
    Y. Wang, S. Yao, Q. Meng, X. Yu, X. Wang, and F. Cui
    Regen Biomater 1, 37-47 (1 November 2014)

    Dose-dependent enhancement of bone marrow stromal cells adhesion, spreading and osteogenic differentiation on atmospheric plasma-treated poly(L-lactic acid) nanofibers
    W. Liu, Q. Cai, F. Zhang, Y. Wei, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Deng, and X. Deng
    Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers 28, 453-467 (1 September 2013)

    Designing Regenerative Biomaterial Therapies for the Clinic
    E. T. Pashuck, and M. M. Stevens
    Sci Transl Med 4, 160sr4-160sr4 (14 November 2012)

    Bioadhesion: a review of concepts and applications
    M. L. B. Palacio, and B. Bhushan
    Phil Trans R Soc A 370, 2321-2347 (28 May 2012)

    Relative influence of surface topography and surface chemistry on cell response to bone implant materials. Part 2: Biological aspects
    K. Anselme, A. Ponche, and M. Bigerelle
    Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 224, 1487-1507 (1 December 2010)

    Multivalent Integrin-Specific Ligands Enhance Tissue Healing and Biomaterial Integration
    T. A. Petrie, J. E. Raynor, D. W. Dumbauld, T. T. Lee, S. Jagtap, K. L. Templeman, D. M. Collard, and A. J. Garcia
    Sci Transl Med 2, 45ra60-45ra60 (18 August 2010)

    Mechanotransduction - a field pulling together?
    C. S. Chen, J. E. Raynor, D. W. Dumbauld, T. T. Lee, S. Jagtap, K. L. Templeman, D. M. Collard, and A. J. Garcia
    J. Cell Sci. 121, 3285-3292 (15 October 2008)

    Response of Musculoskeletal Cells to Biomaterials
    B. D. Boyan, and Z. Schwartz
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14, S157-S162 (1 September 2006)

    Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells
    C. B. Khatiwala, S. R. Peyton, and A. J. Putnam
    Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 290, C1640-C1650 (1 June 2006)

    Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface
    M. M. Stevens, and J. H. George
    Science 310, 1135-1138 (18 November 2005)

    Learning the Chemical Language of Cell-Surface Interactions
    J. T. Groves, and J. H. George
    Sci Signal 2005, pe45-pe45 (13 September 2005)

    Science Signaling. ISSN 1937-9145 (online), 1945-0877 (print). Pre-2008: Science's STKE. ISSN 1525-8882