Research ArticlePharmacology

G protein subtype–specific signaling bias in a series of CCR5 chemokine analogs

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science Signaling  16 Oct 2018:
Vol. 11, Issue 552, eaao6152
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aao6152

You are currently viewing the abstract.

View Full Text

Log in to view the full text

Log in through your institution

Log in through your institution

Biasing CCR5 against inflammation

The G protein–coupled chemokine receptor CCR5 is required for the cellular entry of HIV-1. The ideal drug targeting CCR5 to block HIV-1 infection would induce receptor internalization without triggering the undesirable effect of inflammation. Thus, Lorenzen et al. characterized the signaling properties of two endogenous ligands of CCR5, RANTES and MIP-1α, and several RANTES analogs in cells expressing CCR5 with Gi/o or Gq/11 subunits. They found that CCR5 inhibited generation of the second messenger cAMP by stimulating Gi/o and induced Ca2+ signaling through Gq/11 and that the RANTES analogs differentially activated Gi/o and Gq/11. The authors hypothesize that RANTES analogs that preferentially stimulate Gi/o may block HIV-1 infection without inducing inflammation.


Chemokines and some chemical analogs of chemokines prevent cellular HIV-1 entry when bound to the HIV-1 coreceptors C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) or C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), which are G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs). The ideal HIV-1 entry blocker targeting the coreceptors would display ligand bias and avoid activating G protein–mediated pathways that lead to inflammation. We compared CCR5-dependent activation of second messenger pathways in a single cell line. We studied two endogenous chemokines [RANTES (also known as CCL5) and MIP-1α (also known as CCL3)] and four chemokine analogs of RANTES (5P12-, 5P14-, 6P4-, and PSC-RANTES). We found that CCR5 signaled through both Gi/o and Gq/11. IP1 accumulation and Ca2+ flux arose from Gq/11 activation, rather than from Gβγ subunit release after Gi/o activation as had been previously proposed. The 6P4- and PSC-RANTES analogs were superagonists for Gq/11 activation, whereas the 5P12- and 5P14-RANTES analogs displayed a signaling bias for Gi/o. These results demonstrate that RANTES analogs elicit G protein subtype–specific signaling bias and can cause CCR5 to couple preferentially to Gq/11 rather than to Gi/o signaling pathways. We propose that G protein subtype–specific signaling bias may be a general feature of GPCRs that can couple to more than one G protein family.

View Full Text