FocusCancer

Why geneticists stole cancer research even though cancer is primarily a signaling disease

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science Signaling  22 Jan 2019:
Vol. 12, Issue 565, eaaw3483
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aaw3483

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

  • RE: Why geneticists stole cancer research even though cancer is primarily a signaling disease

    Very well written, Mike - I completely agree.
    One additional possibility is to look downstream at the metabolome.

    Competing Interests: None declared.

Stay Connected to Science Signaling