Editorial GuideAssessment

Living by the Numbers

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science Signaling  01 Dec 2009:
Vol. 2, Issue 99, pp. eg15
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.299eg15

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

  • Do Bigger and "Better" Labs Have Easier Access to High Impact Factor Journals?

    During our either short or long careers as researchers, we have all come across "sexy" projects. We classify projects as "sexy" if they may appeal to high impact factor journals, striving to publish novelties. Indeed, laboratories working on sexy and tough projects often use state-of-the-art technologies to reveal insights that cannot be addressed with older methods or technology. These studies, in turn, are readily published i...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.

Stay Connected to Science Signaling